• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother Appreciation
Gina To Win Big Brother! *Gina Appreciation Thread*
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Damanda
13-07-2013
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Yes like the threads trying to point out how amazing Gina is for basically doing nothing. They are pointless threads that only get responses like "amazing", "Gina to win", "Best HM ever", "she's so funny" I mean seriously do we really need threads where comments literally get pointless responses like this ? just keep it to the Appreciation threads.

People could say don't look at them, which would be fine if we didn't get about 100 a day or people bumping the same old threads with the same pointless responses, it's impossible to avoid them when they are all over the forum.”

I do not disagree so just ignore them.

It's the pious criticism that's galling, and causes no end of
Well you wouldn't say that if it was *blank* it's only because its *blank*
It's the same every year, it's done by the same people every series and its hypocritically whined about by people who do it and perpetuate it.

Speaking of pointless responses... I'd point to all on here, including this one
sleepypoodle
14-07-2013
Gina needs to stay for the time being, purely for entertainment value because she is rude and likely to create dramas. However she most certainly does not deserve to win because unlike in the American Big Brother where the audience tend to admire the most Machiavellian contestant who will do anything, no matter how amoral their tactics in order to win, I have always admired the British viewers for choosing a winner who is basically a decent and genuine person .
Gina has from the start however, proved time and time again that she is incredibly selfish, spoilt, with an overwhelmingly unjustified feeling of entitlement , and that her choice of friends is entirely dependant on what people can do for her, or what use they are to her, but it really is a one way street.
It was disgraceful to hear her whining on about how she expected to remain in the 'safe house' for the duration of her stay and how unfair it was to turf her out! I just don't understand how on earth she could justify such a sentiment, did she seriously believe that she was voted in for her entire stint on the show? Her ego is quite unbelievable!
As I said before, by all means keep her in for now because she is a big character but do not confuse that with thinking that this makes her a worthy winner!
I want to see her earn her keep by digging in with the household chores - make the lazy moo roll her sleeves up and do the cooking for everyone, and some cleaning up and washing the dishes as much as is reasonable. I just think that they allowed her to get away with far too much for those first couple of weeks and now she needs some firm handling to make her realise that she's no better or worse than any of the others.
I don't think that many of the HM's are brave enough to stand up to her which is a good reason to keep Jackie in the house as she won't take any nonsense from Gina and I suspect that Gina is a bit intimidated by her as she stood down pretty sharply over the bed situation.
mitacond
14-07-2013
Originally Posted by sleepypoodle:
“Gina needs to stay for the time being, purely for entertainment value because she is rude and likely to create dramas. However she most certainly does not deserve to win because unlike in the American Big Brother where the audience tend to admire the most Machiavellian contestant who will do anything, no matter how amoral their tactics in order to win, I have always admired the British viewers for choosing a winner who is basically a decent and genuine person .
Gina has from the start however, proved time and time again that she is incredibly selfish, spoilt, with an overwhelmingly unjustified feeling of entitlement , and that her choice of friends is entirely dependant on what people can do for her, or what use they are to her, but it really is a one way street.
It was disgraceful to hear her whining on about how she expected to remain in the 'safe house' for the duration of her stay and how unfair it was to turf her out! I just don't understand how on earth she could justify such a sentiment, did she seriously believe that she was voted in for her entire stint on the show? Her ego is quite unbelievable!
As I said before, by all means keep her in for now because she is a big character but do not confuse that with thinking that this makes her a worthy winner!
I want to see her earn her keep by digging in with the household chores - make the lazy moo roll her sleeves up and do the cooking for everyone, and some cleaning up and washing the dishes as much as is reasonable. I just think that they allowed her to get away with far too much for those first couple of weeks and now she needs some firm handling to make her realise that she's no better or worse than any of the others.
I don't think that many of the HM's are brave enough to stand up to her which is a good reason to keep Jackie in the house as she won't take any nonsense from Gina and I suspect that Gina is a bit intimidated by her as she stood down pretty sharply over the bed situation.”

I don't know if you are aware but these threads not for denigration of said hm. Thanks.
yellowlabbie
14-07-2013
Originally Posted by sleepypoodle:
“Gina needs to stay for the time being, purely for entertainment value because she is rude and likely to create dramas. However she most certainly does not deserve to win because unlike in the American Big Brother where the audience tend to admire the most Machiavellian contestant who will do anything, no matter how amoral their tactics in order to win, I have always admired the British viewers for choosing a winner who is basically a decent and genuine person .
Gina has from the start however, proved time and time again that she is incredibly selfish, spoilt, with an overwhelmingly unjustified feeling of entitlement , and that her choice of friends is entirely dependant on what people can do for her, or what use they are to her, but it really is a one way street.
It was disgraceful to hear her whining on about how she expected to remain in the 'safe house' for the duration of her stay and how unfair it was to turf her out! I just don't understand how on earth she could justify such a sentiment, did she seriously believe that she was voted in for her entire stint on the show? Her ego is quite unbelievable!
As I said before, by all means keep her in for now because she is a big character but do not confuse that with thinking that this makes her a worthy winner!
I want to see her earn her keep by digging in with the household chores - make the lazy moo roll her sleeves up and do the cooking for everyone, and some cleaning up and washing the dishes as much as is reasonable. I just think that they allowed her to get away with far too much for those first couple of weeks and now she needs some firm handling to make her realise that she's no better or worse than any of the others.
I don't think that many of the HM's are brave enough to stand up to her which is a good reason to keep Jackie in the house as she won't take any nonsense from Gina and I suspect that Gina is a bit intimidated by her as she stood down pretty sharply over the bed situation.”

This is an appreciation thread, only positive posts, please
soinnocent
14-07-2013
Gina to win, she has made the show this year..
annw
14-07-2013
Love her.
Stupid_Head
14-07-2013
Why are there two Gina appreciation threads?
soinnocent
14-07-2013
Originally Posted by Stupid_Head:
“Why are there two Gina appreciation threads?”



because she's the best HM
chloedancer
14-07-2013
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Yes like the threads trying to point out how amazing Gina is for basically doing nothing. They are pointless threads that only get responses like "amazing", "Gina to win", "Best HM ever", "she's so funny" I mean seriously do we really need threads where comments literally get pointless responses like this ? just keep it to the Appreciation threads.

People could say don't look at them, which would be fine if we didn't get about 100 a day or people bumping the same old threads with the same pointless responses, it's impossible to avoid them when they are all over the forum.”

thats more or less what we have got to look forward to for the next 2 months.no actual reasons why she should win just the usual "queen gina" "gina to win" "luv gina" "gina 4eva" posts

im pretty sure the average audience age is way way down on preious years looking at the way people type on facebook/twitter and especially the c5 site.Nobody is forming a sentence over 3 words long...

As this is not an actual appreciation thread(it could be sarcasm for all i know) i think its ok to post here.
yellowlabbie
14-07-2013
Originally Posted by chloedancer:
“thats more or less what we have got to look forward to for the next 2 months.no actual reasons why she should win just the usual "queen gina" "gina to win" "luv gina" "gina 4eva" posts

im pretty sure the average audience age is way way down on preious years looking at the way people type on facebook/twitter and especially the c5 site.Nobody is forming a sentence over 3 words long...

As this is not an actual appreciation thread(it could be sarcasm for all i know) i think its ok to post here.”

It is an appreciation thread, the mods have put it in the appreciation thread section. Gina just has 2 APs because she is worthy of 2.
mitacond
14-07-2013
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“It is an appreciation thread, the mods have put it in the appreciation thread section. Gina just has 2 APs because she is worthy of 2.”

Well said of course she is and this is an appreciation thread specifically for those who support said hm and not for discussion of hm's merits or not.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map