• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother International
Results:How should the show's producers deal with racist/homophobic behaviour?
Don't broadcast it on television, but remove offenders from the house
1 (3.03%)
Broadcast it on television, but don't make a big deal out of it
2 (6.06%)
Broadcast it on television, and make it something that is part of the show's narrative
30 (90.91%)
Just ignore it - don't broadcast it on the highlights show, don't mention it to the housemates
0 (0%)
Voters: 33. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
How should the show's producers deal with racist/homophobic behaviour?
Victim Of Fate
16-07-2013
I don't usually watch BBUSA, but the news coverage of this season caught my attention, and I'm now keeping track of what's going on in the house.

In reading the coverage, and comments on this board, I think there are interestingly diverse opinions on how racism, homophobia, and other prejudiced behaviour should be dealt with. I noticed the same thing after the racism controversy on CBB UK 2007. You had people claiming to be annoyed with Channel 4 for broadcasting it, while others were annoyed that they weren't broadcasting it.

So what is the prevailing opinion.
Kyle123
16-07-2013
Showing the footage really was a no-brainer. The houseguests knew what they were letting themselves in for going onto the show, but still choose to reveal such huge character flaws and prejudices to the world. I think the shows audience deserved to see the houseguests say these things before making their mind up on them, because beyond the game, isn't that really what the show is about? You put sixteen totally different men and women into a house and then see how they interact and respond to each other and their environment, all the while knowing that the world is watching your every move and word. If your reaction to the house is to verbally attack the others based on their race, sexuality or whatever else, then shouldn't the audience be allowed to see that and judge you in return?

Beyond that, I'm not sure the show is doing a particularly great job in dealing with the situation. Whilst the houseguests are ultimately free to say what they want, some line does need to be drawn, especially now when the attacks are no longer just snide behind the back remarks when the target is in the other room. The show and CBS have a responsibility to the houseguests they select, and to not interfere at all within the house seems irresponsible to me. Seeing Candice breaking down to Howard after the fight in the latest episode really hit home hard for me. The girl is being judged and mocked for the colour of her skin, and nobody really seems to be doing anything about it. Sure, those saying the things to her are being vilified outside of the house, but she (and the others who have been abused) still have to live through that horror for the next few weeks at least, and I just don't think that's acceptable.

I also believe that in an entirely different way, the show is also letting down the perpetrators too. I struggle to find any sympathy for them because they are all adults who need to be more aware of the consequences their actions should have, but I do struggle to find pleasure in watching them making their situation worse and worse by the day, completely oblivious to how people already think of them. First and foremost, better care needs to be given to anyone who has been victimised by these people, but I also think the show should have called in Aaryn and GinaMarie and the others and made it crystal clear that that type of behaviour will be tolerated under no circumstances, and that they are taking a huge risk every time they make a bigoted remark. They deserve what they get for the way they have treated people who have done nothing to them, but at the same time, I'd hate to read about one of them being attacked in the street once they get out of the house. I'm sure a lot of people won't agree with me and I totally get that, but I do think it's irresponsible of the show to let its participants continue to make things worse for themselves when they are unaware of the damage that they have already done to their lives. The show was correct to show what they had initially said, but I also think they had a responsibility to inform the houseguests that they had done so, to stop them from making things even worse.

Looking forward, I think the show definitely needs to toughen the rules on this type of thing for the benefit of all houseguests. In an older thread, I proposed a system of increasingly tough punishments for houseguests who repeatedly use slurs or act with prejudice to others in the house. Obviously the level of punishment should depend on the severity of what is said/done, but I think ultimately it should be something like: * Formal Warning * Solitary confinement * Instantly put on slop for the week * Penalty nomination * and then finally in the most severe of cases, I do think eviction has to come.

I can't help but feel that with a more visible and strict rule structure this whole ugly affair could have been avoided. Hopefully if this show comes out of this the other side it can learn from mistakes this season and clamp down on this type of thing, because nobody comes out of this mess a winner.
molly noggin
16-07-2013
Broadcast it and remove the offenders from the house.
Flight815-23D
17-07-2013
Show them all, and how others react. They've broken no laws or rules, so let the public do their worst when they get out (or in voting on twists). What's not fair is showing some, but letting others hide in the dark and get a free pass.
molly noggin
17-07-2013
Originally Posted by Flight815-23D:
“Show them all, and how others react. They've broken no laws or rules, so let the public do their worst when they get out (or in voting on twists).”

This seems to be a common view and I don't agree with it because, as Kyle put it so well

Originally Posted by Kyle123:
“The show and CBS have a responsibility to the houseguests they select, and to not interfere at all within the house seems irresponsible to me. Seeing Candice breaking down to Howard after the fight in the latest episode really hit home hard for me. The girl is being judged and mocked for the colour of her skin, and nobody really seems to be doing anything about it. Sure, those saying the things to her are being vilified outside of the house, but she (and the others who have been abused) still have to live through that horror for the next few weeks at least, and I just don't think that's acceptable.”

Spot on.
Flight815-23D
17-07-2013
Originally Posted by molly noggin:
“This seems to be a common view and I don't agree with it because, as Kyle put it so well


Spot on.”

The problem is where do you draw the line? Dumb blonde comments? The F-word, as Wolfy would put it? If one hm drinks too much and another hm calls them an alcoholic, should that be interfered with?

What's going on right now is the worst case scenario, but it's a slippery slope. Someone who really wanted to go after someone else in the house could just as easily do it without bringing up race, but would that be acceptable, then? Constantly calling someone stupid or ugly or fat is just as harmful to their psyche. We've all seen people be rather brutally mean girled on tv, and it's just as uncomfortable, so do you then ban all insults?
Vesna
17-07-2013
Originally Posted by Victim Of Fate:
“I don't usually watch BBUSA, but the news coverage of this season caught my attention, and I'm now keeping track of what's going on in the house.

So what is the prevailing opinion.”

In my case I haven't watched because of the cast they chose. I am so offended by their cast I can't, won't watch. I have no idea what happened after episode 2 or 3, dismayed it's been allowed to continue.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map