|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 51) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2476 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
I'm actually a little bit surprised there, EastEnders' episode was very strong last night.
Quote:
Slightly low for the second Coronation Street, for whatever reason.
Dented by Celebrity Masterchef? It had 304k on +1, about 100k more than last week.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2477 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,674
|
Quote:
Maybe it needs a run of strong episodes before word of mouth will help its figures?
The only thing that could happen is it could give Monday's ep a boost outside of the usual Monday boost it gets. Assuming it was strong - I didn't see any soap last night. Emm, while still great, is winding down from the last big week or two, so I'd be surprised if it was ahead, unless marginally, on Monday. It's share of course, will still be comfortably ahead |
|
|
|
|
#2478 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,049
|
Quote:
I think it should get ESPN sized ratings. All Sky subscribers who paid for ESPN would I imagine pay the £12 for BT Sport. Wasn't it £10 for ESPN? The numbers watching via BT TV will I'd imagine be pretty tiny, at least to start with, and it's also not on Virgin Media yet.
I'd be expecting Premier League games to get approx 500k, perhaps lower if a Virgin deal isn't sorted. It's all pretty complicated though - my brother, as a BT Broadband customer, was all excited about getting BT Sport for free. Who can blame him, Jake Humphrey and those adverts constantly tell you that. Then I told him he actually had to shell out a load more to actually watch on the TV, and he could only actually watch for free on his iPad and PC. He was not best pleased! Humphrey really has taken to this salesman lark...! |
|
|
|
#2479 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 689
|
That Music Show 542k which will have helped Big Brother
|
|
|
|
|
#2480 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14,202
|
Quote:
I'm actually a little bit surprised there, EastEnders' episode was very strong last night. Is this the first time ever (possibly outside of BGT weeks) that Emmerdale has been ahead of EastEnders for every episode.
Slightly low for the second Coronation Street, for whatever reason. |
|
|
|
|
#2481 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,677
|
Quote:
I didn't realise that! The ads make it clear you get the channel for free if you take broadband with them. What con merchants.
Humphrey really has taken to this salesman lark...! 'Free with BT Broadband' unless you actually want to watch it on a TV.... |
|
|
|
|
#2482 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 20,371
|
Quote:
I didn't realise that! The ads make it clear you get the channel for free if you take broadband with them. What con merchants.
If you have BT BB but don't have Sky, you have to pay additional monthly charges for BT Vision/YouView and set up costs for a STB. |
|
|
|
|
#2483 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14,202
|
Quote:
That Music Show 542k which will have helped Big Brother
|
|
|
|
|
#2484 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: exeter
Posts: 14,623
|
Quote:
That Music Show 542k which will have helped Big Brother
Some flops are fair enough, but this was so predictable. |
|
|
|
|
#2485 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
Liam Hamilton @LiamHamiltonDCD 2m
Another quiet worker at 8, Worlds Busiest Hotel, 1.3m + BB eviction, 1.8m & ashes highlights gives 5 good peak, ahead of bbc2 across day. Wow, 1.8m for BB. Don't know if that includes +1, but that's brilliant (last week got 1.78m), so would be interesting if it beat that last night. What did the Ashes highlights get?
|
|
|
|
|
#2486 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,856
|
Quote:
Some very good figures for C5 there.
What did the Ashes highlights get? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2487 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
This, but also a "strong" episode of a soap would never rate any better than a normal or weak one, unless it it's been trailed or part of a big build up of episodes - for standalone good episodes, no one is going to know what it's like until they're watching or indeed until it's over!
|
|
|
|
|
#2488 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 8,397
|
Emmerdale has now beaten Eastenders 9 times in a row. Is this a record?
|
|
|
|
|
#2489 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,288
|
Quote:
Honestly why did C4 commission this, his BBC3 show bombed despite having all the promo you could want, with the radio show.
Some flops are fair enough, but this was so predictable. |
|
|
|
|
#2490 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
Can't believe how long Emm has stayed out in front for. The difference in share between that and EE is astonishing too - and shows really that in terms of raw numbers it can only get so much at 7pm and there's clearly more viewers up for grabs later, so it's doing fantastically to be ahead.
19:35-20:00 - Coronation Street: 7.14m / (38.5%) = 18.5m 20:30-20:55 - Coronation Street: 6.75m / (32.5%) = 20.8m 19:00-19:30 - Emmerdale: 5.93m / (36.0%) = 16.5m 20:00-20:30 - EastEnders: 5.66m / (29.7%) = 19.1m 18:30-19:00 - Hollyoaks: 823k / (5.3%) = 15.5m 19:00-19:30 - Hollyoaks: 471k / (2.9%) = 16.5m* * 471k/2.9% = 16.2m rather than 16.5m, but this is due to a rounding effect, as the share was for E4's Hollyoaks was probably slightly over 2.85%. |
|
|
|
|
#2491 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,434
|
Quote:
Some people never learn. Obviously with a channel run by Jay Hunt this was expected.
|
|
|
|
|
#2492 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,429
|
Is the 1.8 for BB confirmed?
|
|
|
|
|
#2493 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,456
|
Quote:
With a young-skewing show like EE it's possible that a huge, positive social-media reaction could get people switching on/over to it and boost an episode's average while on air, but it would have to be quite an amazing response for that to make any significant difference I feel. What it needs is a settled period of good-quality normal episodes, with the occasional big episode to draw in more casuals.
|
|
|
|
|
#2494 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
Quote:
Honestly why did C4 commission this, his BBC3 show bombed despite having all the promo you could want, with the radio show.
Some flops are fair enough, but this was so predictable. As the new host of R1 breakfast, with a background on C4, it wasn't that ridiculous to have him front it. And the show was produced by Wall To Wall, who make The Voice (although I guess that could be seen as a good or a bad thing!). They tried to make it a cross of the usual Friday night fare with a bit of music which seems reasonable in an era where music just doesn't rate. But I don't think it mattered what they did, music was never going to work. |
|
|
|
|
#2495 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,049
|
Quote:
With a young-skewing show like EE it's possible that a huge, positive social-media reaction could get people switching on/over to it and boost an episode's average while on air, but it would have to be quite an amazing response for that to make any significant difference I feel. What it needs is a settled period of good-quality normal episodes, with the occasional big episode to draw in more casuals.
Trust me, if all of the above happen in the next month or so, the ratings will go back up, and EmFm will be back in third. |
|
|
|
#2496 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,456
|
Quote:
The best thing for an EE ratings revival will be for people to come back from summer holidays, go back to school, for the sun to start setting before 7.30, the air to turn cooler, and it to get wetter.
Trust me, if all of the above happen in the next month or so, the ratings will go back up, and EmFm will be back in third. Anyway its not like this happens every year, its the first time EE has fallen below and in competition with Emmerdale for this length of time. |
|
|
|
|
#2497 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
Emmerdale has now beaten Eastenders 9 times in a row.
Emmerdale (exc +1) v Eastenders Winner in bold Mon 22/07: 6.05m (34.7%) v 6.74m (32.5%) Tue 23/07: 5.58m (27.1%) v 4.84m (23.7%) [clash, both at 19:30) Wed 24/07: 6.00m (35.1%) v (not on air) Thu 25/07: 6.03m (35.3%) & 6.39m (32.9%) v 5.69m (30.9%) Fri 26/07: 6.05m (37.3%) v 5.24m (28.8%) ---------- Mon 29/07: 6.77m (36.2%) v 6.52m (30.9%) Tue 30/07: 6.17m (35.1%) v 6.06m (32.5%) Wed 31/07: 6.00m (35.1%) v (not on air) Thu 01/08: 5.78m (35.4%) & 5.91m (31.2%) v 5.74m (32.8%) Fri 02/08: 5.93m (36.0%) v 5.66m (29.7%) The ED ratings above from the 25th to the 30th inclusive are not tape-checked. I believe this would not interrupt the run of wins, judging by the scale of victory on the nights when tape-checking might reduce ED's rating (Friday 26th and Monday 29th).. |
|
|
|
|
#2498 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 20,371
|
Any BT Sport ratings for their first day as pay channels?
|
|
|
|
|
#2499 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
The best thing for an EE ratings revival will be for people to come back from summer holidays, go back to school, for the sun to start setting before 7.30, the air to turn cooler, and it to get wetter.
Trust me, if all of the above happen in the next month or so, the ratings will go back up, and EmFm will be back in third. |
|
|
|
|
#2500 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,456
|
Anyone got Doc Martin's ratings for last night?
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37.




