Do we not always have a week when all HMs are up under the pretext of a 'serious' rule-break? That way we can have only the most 'deserving' HMs in the run-up to the final. Here's hoping.
Dearest Big Brother: ALL HMs up next week please
1 of 2
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“Do we not always have a week when all HMs are up under the pretext of a 'serious' rule-break? That way we can have only the most 'deserving' HMs in the run-up to the final. Here's hoping.”
“Do we not always have a week when all HMs are up under the pretext of a 'serious' rule-break? That way we can have only the most 'deserving' HMs in the run-up to the final. Here's hoping.
”
Only if it is vote to save.
Yes please
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“Do we not always have a week when all HMs are up under the pretext of a 'serious' rule-break? That way we can have only the most 'deserving' HMs in the run-up to the final. Here's hoping.”
“Do we not always have a week when all HMs are up under the pretext of a 'serious' rule-break? That way we can have only the most 'deserving' HMs in the run-up to the final. Here's hoping.
”
I like that idea, also they could put a poll on the C5 website and let the public nominate then the 3 with most noms are up for eviction-
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Only if it is vote to save.”
“Only if it is vote to save.”
Good point although I still think deserving HMs would stay under a vote to evict. Just means fanbases would have to mobilise and strategise...
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“Good point although I still think deserving HMs would stay under a vote to evict. Just means fanbases would have to mobilise and strategise...”
“Good point although I still think deserving HMs would stay under a vote to evict. Just means fanbases would have to mobilise and strategise...”
Yeahhh cos thats gonna work.
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Only if it is vote to save.”
“Only if it is vote to save.”
this. A vote to evict and we lose another great character.
Yes,and then with the vote to evict,all deadwood gets to stay,as no one can be arsed to vote for them.
Originally Posted by Yera:
“I like that idea, also they could put a poll on the C5 website and let the public nominate then the 3 with most noms are up for eviction-”
“I like that idea, also they could put a poll on the C5 website and let the public nominate then the 3 with most noms are up for eviction-
”
ridiculous idea - we will lose big characters again.
No, i hate the all up crap. If you want the so called "big characters" to stay then maybe they should try harder to be liked by the HM's.
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“No, i hate the all up crap. If you want the so called "big characters" to stay then maybe they should try harder to be liked by the HM's.”
“No, i hate the all up crap. If you want the so called "big characters" to stay then maybe they should try harder to be liked by the HM's.”
So good HMs should spend their time @rse-licking in order to avoid getting nominated. No thanks.
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“Do we not always have a week when all HMs are up under the pretext of a 'serious' rule-break? That way we can have only the most 'deserving' HMs in the run-up to the final. Here's hoping.”
“Do we not always have a week when all HMs are up under the pretext of a 'serious' rule-break? That way we can have only the most 'deserving' HMs in the run-up to the final. Here's hoping.
”
I agree on this, and also BB, look at all the extra revenue it will bring in,lol.
Seriously, we could get rid of the bores, will make the final so much better and more entertaining.
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“ridiculous idea - we will lose big characters again.”
“ridiculous idea - we will lose big characters again.”
but the way the people are being selected to be up for eviction the people we want to seeing are escaping nomination- also many of us who watch are not in the uk and cannot vote where as we can take part in the online polls- I think it would be interesting to get factual feedback from the public as to who is popular and unpopular
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“They did that in week 1 with vote-offs for the top contenders.”
“They did that in week 1 with vote-offs for the top contenders.”
We hardly knew them then though. My opinions on some have done a 360 practically...
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“So good HMs should spend their time @rse-licking in order to avoid getting nominated. No thanks.”
“So good HMs should spend their time @rse-licking in order to avoid getting nominated. No thanks.”
No, i didn't say that, what i was saying was the HM's that get put up shouldn't be ass's all the time.
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“No, i didn't say that, what i was saying was the HM's that get put up shouldn't be ass's all the time.”
“No, i didn't say that, what i was saying was the HM's that get put up shouldn't be ass's all the time.”
That's such a sweeping statement. HMs are often strategic with their noms and will nom who they think others will nom, nom in cliques or even worse only nom due to powers of suggestion by others...
1 of 2
