• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Dearest Big Brother: ALL HMs up next week please
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
SegaGamer
21-07-2013
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“That's such a sweeping statement. HMs are often strategic with their noms and will nom who they think others will nom, nom in cliques or even worse only nom due to powers of suggestion by others...”

I don't see that. If people can't see why people like Gina and Dexter get put up every week then they need to pay more attention.
Ronell_Davis
21-07-2013
Yes please.
Fanntastik
21-07-2013
Vote to save, all up, double eviction please

Cull the dull.
Sweet FA
21-07-2013
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“I don't see that. If people can't see why people like Gina and Dexter get put up every week then they need to pay more attention.”

I think most people understand why they keep getting put up the proof of which will be in the final pudding.
Sweet FA
21-07-2013
YES, YES, YES!!! In the spirit of common sense, it should be a vote to save - they surely would have to switch the final voting to vote to save anyway? Unfortunately can't amend the OP.
Sweet FA
22-07-2013
*Bump*

All HMs up for eviction would breathe much-needed new life into this series. Sick to death of the dullards and tedious 'love triangle' now.
TheManWhoLaughs
22-07-2013
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“*Bump*

All HMs up for eviction would breathe much-needed new life into this series. Sick to death of this tedious 'love triangle' now.”

How would it change anything?

In vote-to-save, Sam or Sophie would go, which would change nothing as they're barely shown as it is.
In vote-to-evict, we'd probably still lose Hazel or maybe Callum, and both of them are already going to be up in a normal vote.
Xtraaa
22-07-2013
Good idea, things are so dull atm. We definitely need to shake things up a bit.
Sweet FA
22-07-2013
Originally Posted by TheManWhoLaughs:
“How would it change anything?

In vote-to-save, Sam or Sophie would go, which would change nothing as they're barely shown as it is.
In vote-to-evict, we'd probably still lose Hazel or maybe Callum, and both of them are already going to be up in a normal vote.”

Anything that is unexpected shakes things up. Dan for one is a completely different person when he's up, as are some of the others, as we get to see their true colours. They may all revert to type after the eviction but being up gives them a short, sharp shock that they could be booted out.
TheManWhoLaughs
22-07-2013
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“They may all revert to type after the eviction but being up makes them less complacent.”

I agree with shaking things up, but I don't think it's the most interesting way to do it. I can't imagine Sophie somehow morphing into an entertaining character just because she's up for eviction, for example. Dan being even more paranoid again isn't my idea of fun.

Last year's Turf Wars thing was a really good way to shake things up. I'd much rather they did a proper task like that instead of more nom rigging.
Sweet FA
22-07-2013
Originally Posted by TheManWhoLaughs:
“I agree with shaking things up, but I don't think it's the most interesting way to do it. I can't imagine Sophie somehow morphing into an entertaining character just because she's up for eviction, for example. Dan being even more paranoid again isn't my idea of fun.

Last year's Turf Wars thing was a really good way to shake things up. I'd much rather they did a proper task like that instead of more nom rigging.”

'All up' isn't nom rigging, it's simply giving the public their right to have their say...on a very level playing field. The public are the ones who will have the final say ultimately anyway so don't see a problem. Some HMs in there are far too influential in terms of who other HMs vote for...which is fine to a degree but too many sheep in there following the 'leader'.

It's 'reality TV' after all; nothing wrong with some of them in there getting a much-needed reality check.
Sweet FA
25-07-2013
^^^Even if BB doesn't oblige, reckon there'll be a fair few up with only this week's safe house dwellers managing to dodge noms...probably Sophie and Sam
Cornchips
25-07-2013
only on a vote to save please.
chai_09
25-07-2013
Yes , please
Monty_Brewster
25-07-2013
There's been so many twists, anyone who thinks there will be normal noms and an eviction need to go live in a mental asylum.
MiniMeToo
25-07-2013
I think it's only right that they are all up, as they now know who to pick on.
cyberwar
25-07-2013
Its time for all up. Most of them had a free ride this week.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map