Originally Posted by terry45:
“It's becoming more and more obvious that Hopkins has serious mental issues.”
“It's becoming more and more obvious that Hopkins has serious mental issues.”
Sadly it appears that a lot of her supporters do as well.
Katie Hopkins
32 of 42
Originally Posted by Jakobjoe:
“maybe shes not popular on the left of politics but you cant please everyone.
”
“maybe shes not popular on the left of politics but you cant please everyone.
”
Shame on you. You don't have to take on her adolescent false rhetoric. I bet we're all fat too.
I wonder if the people who support her have ever really considered her true motivation?
Cause, let's face it, she is no crusader with passionate beliefs and a desire to change the world. She doesn't spout her viscious rhetoric in the hope that governments and regimes will be moved to action and peoples lives will be improved.
Nope, Katie does it for the money.
In itself that's not something to be criticised for, we all do things to make money. But very few of us do it by spitting out bile and vitriol.
Katie doesn't give a damn who gets hurt in her crusade to fill the Bank of Katie, including her own family. What decent mother would not consider how her now, high profile, image is going to affect the lives of her children. Because there is no doubt that other kids will listen to their parents opinions of her and the hate for her will spill over to affect her children also.
But then Katie Hopkins ian't a "decent" mother. If she was she would shut her noxious, offensive mouth and disappear forever.
Cause, let's face it, she is no crusader with passionate beliefs and a desire to change the world. She doesn't spout her viscious rhetoric in the hope that governments and regimes will be moved to action and peoples lives will be improved.
Nope, Katie does it for the money.
In itself that's not something to be criticised for, we all do things to make money. But very few of us do it by spitting out bile and vitriol.
Katie doesn't give a damn who gets hurt in her crusade to fill the Bank of Katie, including her own family. What decent mother would not consider how her now, high profile, image is going to affect the lives of her children. Because there is no doubt that other kids will listen to their parents opinions of her and the hate for her will spill over to affect her children also.
But then Katie Hopkins ian't a "decent" mother. If she was she would shut her noxious, offensive mouth and disappear forever.
Originally Posted by Jakobjoe:
“multi talented. im sure she can go in to tv next. she has the looks and brain power /drive to be successful. she was in the apprentice and has done well ever since plus half a million people follow her on twitter”
“multi talented. im sure she can go in to tv next. she has the looks and brain power /drive to be successful. she was in the apprentice and has done well ever since plus half a million people follow her on twitter”
Who will work with her on TV? If she has a chat show, who will want to go on it? She is hardly going to compete with Alan Carr, Jonathan Ross, Graham Norton or even Loose Women or Paul O'Grady, she will be useless for anyone needing to promote a book or record, with a small audience. She can't interview, if anyone challenges her she attacks them calling them fat or saying the look like they smell. And she uses people that are more famous for publicity for her own self promotion. She made very nasty comments about Kelly Clarkson, when she herself would never get even invited on The Graham Norton Show (Though I would like to see him interview her..., he would make mince meat out of her...). She appeals to a limited right wing audience, she would be kicked out of The Conservatives if she had been a member for the things she has written. She is not especially bright, having a degree does not make anyone intelligent, (David Cameron went to Oxford, not that bright..) She has no people skills, she can't even talk in a normal manner without exaggarated projection. And she is a sociopath, why would UKIPpers, like a sociopath?
People say if they don't like it, stick to The Guardian, unfortunately, when she is in the National Press, when she is on radio, it reflects on all of us, it is embarrassing and deeply shameful, that those views are considered to be right, by some of the British public. It is her supporters that are more dangerous.
Originally Posted by Jakobjoe:
“multi talented. im sure she can go in to tv next. she has the looks and brain power /drive to be successful. she was in the apprentice and has done well ever since plus half a million people follow her on twitter”
“multi talented. im sure she can go in to tv next. she has the looks and brain power /drive to be successful. she was in the apprentice and has done well ever since plus half a million people follow her on twitter”
Go on TV next? Do you know anything at all about her? She's been on TV and she's now generally persona non grata. She's basically failed at everything in her life. She's an habitual liar! You need to do some real research on this cretin you admire so much. Constantly trolling on Twitter is her main occupation and thank goodness she's been silenced since yesterday. How she's coping with the withdrawal is another question.
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“Go on TV next? Do you know anything at all about her? She's been on TV and she's now generally persona non grata. She's basically failed at everything in her life. She's an habitual liar! You need to do some real research on this cretin you admire so much. Constantly trolling on Twitter is her main occupation and thank goodness she's been silenced since yesterday. How she's coping with the withdrawal is another question.”
“Go on TV next? Do you know anything at all about her? She's been on TV and she's now generally persona non grata. She's basically failed at everything in her life. She's an habitual liar! You need to do some real research on this cretin you admire so much. Constantly trolling on Twitter is her main occupation and thank goodness she's been silenced since yesterday. How she's coping with the withdrawal is another question.”
The getting fat/losing weight prog ended up on a minor channel that registers audience in the thousands, rather than millions. She's not as famous or popular as she and her fanbase would like to think.
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“Go on TV next? Do you know anything at all about her? She's been on TV and she's now generally persona non grata. She's basically failed at everything in her life. She's an habitual liar! You need to do some real research on this cretin you admire so much. Constantly trolling on Twitter is her main occupation and thank goodness she's been silenced since yesterday. How she's coping with the withdrawal is another question.”
“Go on TV next? Do you know anything at all about her? She's been on TV and she's now generally persona non grata. She's basically failed at everything in her life. She's an habitual liar! You need to do some real research on this cretin you admire so much. Constantly trolling on Twitter is her main occupation and thank goodness she's been silenced since yesterday. How she's coping with the withdrawal is another question.”
And why has she failed? Not all on health grounds is it? I would speculate that it is not too disconnected from her attitude towards other people, refusal to listen to sound advice and inability to recognise when she has overstepped the mark/ is in the wrong.
Katie Hopkins is never wrong (as she sees it).
Sadly, she will be loving all this attention. To her, it doesn't matter what form it takes, as long as she's at the centre of it.
Originally Posted by dorydaryl:
“And why has she failed? Not all on health grounds is it? I would speculate that it is not too disconnected from her attitude towards other people, refusal to listen to sound advice and inability to recognise when she has overstepped the mark/ is in the wrong.
Katie Hopkins is never wrong (as she sees it).
Sadly, she will be loving all this attention. To her, it doesn't matter what form it takes, as long as she's at the centre of it.”
“And why has she failed? Not all on health grounds is it? I would speculate that it is not too disconnected from her attitude towards other people, refusal to listen to sound advice and inability to recognise when she has overstepped the mark/ is in the wrong.
Katie Hopkins is never wrong (as she sees it).
Sadly, she will be loving all this attention. To her, it doesn't matter what form it takes, as long as she's at the centre of it.”
She also conned Sandhurst by somehow getting away with life endangering irresponsibility, not disclosing her epilepsy, which wasted a fortune of tax payers money as she had a bursary for there and Uni. She was thrown out of there and did not graduate. Her so called "business" is a load of tripe. And this is all lies.
https://www.katiehopkins.co.uk/
Quote:
“A trained economist; graduate of Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, Intelligence Corps bursar and qualified marketer, Katie spent 15 years working for a Global Brand Consultancy in UK, Tokyo and USA leaving as MD, UK.”
“A trained economist; graduate of Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, Intelligence Corps bursar and qualified marketer, Katie spent 15 years working for a Global Brand Consultancy in UK, Tokyo and USA leaving as MD, UK.”
From the thread in GD
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...6&postcount=50
Quote:
“Katie Hopkins and the editor of The Sun, David Dinsmore, have been reported to the Metropolitan police for incitement to racial hatred.”
“Katie Hopkins and the editor of The Sun, David Dinsmore, have been reported to the Metropolitan police for incitement to racial hatred.”
At the end of this interview which she cut off because she was bored, she says 700 people (those "cockroaches") died because they couldn't swim!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...tml?icn=puff-4
If she is sacked from the Sun, it's not the first time a newspaper has got rid because of her unacceptable abuse and public opinion.
http://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/yo...b-7261610.html
.
Her far right wing elitist archaic views take the pee out of most of her supporters who she exploits for cash. How many of them were privately educated? That's all that is worth anything and state school pupils should not aspire to want a Uni. education.
http://www.cherwell.org/comment/inte...-katie-hopkins
.
Quote:
“ Private schools are an “efficient way of processing highly intelligent individuals… into elite institutions”, because the children who deserve to succeed are naturally to be found amongst the upper classes. ”
“ Private schools are an “efficient way of processing highly intelligent individuals… into elite institutions”, because the children who deserve to succeed are naturally to be found amongst the upper classes. ”
Originally Posted by The Prumeister:
“She's an absolute shoo-in for UKIP. She spouts the kind of irrational, vindictive and unintelligent bile that they thrive on.”
“She's an absolute shoo-in for UKIP. She spouts the kind of irrational, vindictive and unintelligent bile that they thrive on.”
Originally Posted by The Prumeister:
“Fair play if you're happy to vote for a party where members have correlated gay marriage with floods and compared homosexuals to paedophiles (to name but 2 instances of idiocy). Fair play also for supporting a woman who happily claims that she doesn't care if immigrants or dementia sufferers die.
She'd be great in UKIP as they haven't got a hope in hell of getting elected.”
“Fair play if you're happy to vote for a party where members have correlated gay marriage with floods and compared homosexuals to paedophiles (to name but 2 instances of idiocy). Fair play also for supporting a woman who happily claims that she doesn't care if immigrants or dementia sufferers die.
She'd be great in UKIP as they haven't got a hope in hell of getting elected.”
What you neglect to mention here, is that the members you are judging UKIP on were sacked for what they said. Yet you're still giving people this false information, pulling the wool over ill-informed people's eyes for your own ends.
That's akin to branding Liberals a party of Paedophiles because of Cyril Smith (MBE)? (Did he get ousted?), or Labour with their list (see google).
Originally Posted by The Prumeister:
“She advocated using gun boats on them. Nothing but inciting racial hatred.
I find it hugely depressing that people unquestionably accept this kind of propaganda.
Whilst she has freedom of speech, we equally have the freedom to respond.
Shame on her and all who allow her a platform.”
“She advocated using gun boats on them. Nothing but inciting racial hatred.
I find it hugely depressing that people unquestionably accept this kind of propaganda.
Whilst she has freedom of speech, we equally have the freedom to respond.
Shame on her and all who allow her a platform.”
Me too.
Originally Posted by AbbieJay:
“What you neglect to mention here, is that the members you are judging UKIP on were sacked for what they said. Yet you're still giving people this false information, pulling the wool over ill-informed people's eyes for your own ends.
That's akin to branding Liberals a party of Paedophiles because of Cyril Smith (MBE)? (Did he get ousted?), or Labour with their list (see google).
Me too.”
“What you neglect to mention here, is that the members you are judging UKIP on were sacked for what they said. Yet you're still giving people this false information, pulling the wool over ill-informed people's eyes for your own ends.
That's akin to branding Liberals a party of Paedophiles because of Cyril Smith (MBE)? (Did he get ousted?), or Labour with their list (see google).
Me too.”
No it isn't.
& I did not give false information to anyone. These events happened, irrespective of whether these idiots were sacked.
If anyone's interested this is a Save The Children petition.
http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/restart-the-rescue
And another
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitio...-search-rescue
The reality from the thread in GD
Of course KH claims 700 died because they couldn't swim. Another example of the level of her mentality.
http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/restart-the-rescue
Quote:
“RESTART THE RESCUE: HELP STOP CHILDREN DROWNING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN
Next month Britain has a chance to help change the EU’s shameful policy of leaving children to drown in the Mediterranean Sea. Our leaders won’t act unless we send a clear message. Sign our petition now.”
“RESTART THE RESCUE: HELP STOP CHILDREN DROWNING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN
Next month Britain has a chance to help change the EU’s shameful policy of leaving children to drown in the Mediterranean Sea. Our leaders won’t act unless we send a clear message. Sign our petition now.”
And another
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitio...-search-rescue
The reality from the thread in GD
Quote:
“QUOTE=lemoncurd;77776239]Yesterday, 200 kids slowly drowned whilst locked in the lower decks of a sinking ship.
Hopkins is no doubt rubbing her hands in glee that these young "cockroaches" won't be getting anywhere near Fulham”
“QUOTE=lemoncurd;77776239]Yesterday, 200 kids slowly drowned whilst locked in the lower decks of a sinking ship.
Hopkins is no doubt rubbing her hands in glee that these young "cockroaches" won't be getting anywhere near Fulham”
Of course KH claims 700 died because they couldn't swim. Another example of the level of her mentality.
Originally Posted by Richard_Noble1:
“ignore her maybe she.ll go away”
“ignore her maybe she.ll go away”
Most of the time I would agree with you, but in the case of her most recent comments it's not appropriate. Calling people cockroaches and calling for them to be shot needs to be stood up to and stood up to loudly otherwise it becomes acceptable to think like this.
Originally Posted by The Prumeister:
“No it isn't.
& I did not give false information to anyone. These events happened, irrespective of whether these idiots were sacked.”
“No it isn't.
& I did not give false information to anyone. These events happened, irrespective of whether these idiots were sacked.”
The events I mentioned also happened also, the analogy is the same. See the posts I quoted of what you said of UKIP and the evidence you gave to back up the slur. (The sacked members, you didn't mention were given the boot) and generalising a whole party on the judgement of these sacked fleeting members.
Hopkins has nothing to do with UKIP or their policies on a points system immigration like they have in a number of successful countries.
More than 700 will die in this country if people continue to be allowed to cross our borders without control, including invading illegally with no way to trace them or know who they are. There could be other, less savoury reasons for sneaking into another country minus any identification.
Anyway, back to Hopkins and her hateful comments. She should not have used language like that, same as she shouldn't use hateful language about other groups of people that she does, such as ginger kids and poor people. And The Sun, well it's not the worst thing they've ever printed, they are known for it, yet people still keep buying their crappy rag and keeping them in business.
Anyway, back to Hopkins and her hateful comments. She should not have used language like that, same as she shouldn't use hateful language about other groups of people that she does, such as ginger kids and poor people. And The Sun, well it's not the worst thing they've ever printed, they are known for it, yet people still keep buying their crappy rag and keeping them in business.
Originally Posted by AbbieJay:
“The events I mentioned also happened also, the analogy is the same. See the posts I quoted of what you said of UKIP and the evidence you gave to back up the slur. (The sacked members, you didn't mention were given the boot) and generalising a whole party on the judgement of these sacked fleeting members.
Hopkins has nothing to do with UKIP or their policies on a points system immigration like they have in a number of successful countries.”
“The events I mentioned also happened also, the analogy is the same. See the posts I quoted of what you said of UKIP and the evidence you gave to back up the slur. (The sacked members, you didn't mention were given the boot) and generalising a whole party on the judgement of these sacked fleeting members.
Hopkins has nothing to do with UKIP or their policies on a points system immigration like they have in a number of successful countries.”
No it isn't.
& at no point did I ever state that Hopkins has anything to do with UKIP; what I said was is that she would be ideal for their brand of hyperbole and racist rhetoric.
The Society of Black Lawyers will report Murdoch's Lawyers to the regulators.
http://www.solicitorsjournal.com/new...-lawyers-regul
Quote:
“Speaking to Solicitors Journal, chair of the SBL, Dr Peter Herbert OBE, said it was 'high time' the 'Incitement Law' under section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986 was enforced and, even if it did not result in a prosecution, the fact that there was an investigation and a potential arrest would regulate journalists far better than any 'moral exultation'.
'At the same time,' he continued, 'we're going to write a very detailed letter to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court with a view to reporting her and the editor, and one of the things we will consider is, if we find that any barrister or solicitor has authorised [the article] we will make a formal complaint to the Bar Council/SRA. Our net is to catch those people who have a professional responsibility to make sure offence is not caused.'
...
When asked about Hopkins' right to exercise free speech, Herbert said the Celebrity Big Brother contestant was an opportunist who knew very well what the limitations were, but didn't care.
'This is a Sarah Palin type character who really couldn't care less. Obviously the people who do know better are The Sun and their lawyers who must have proof read [the column] before it went out. There is, I suppose, a very cynical view that actually, in the current climate of UKIP etcetera, we can say what we like about migrants and there will be no comeback or very little.'
Herbert said there was an 'appalling level of support' for migrants in the public domain, and that pre-existing soft racism and xenophobia is being tapped into and given life by UKIP and others. He also added that the issue of settlement and that of Britain's obligation under the 1951 Geneva convention were being conflated.”
“Speaking to Solicitors Journal, chair of the SBL, Dr Peter Herbert OBE, said it was 'high time' the 'Incitement Law' under section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986 was enforced and, even if it did not result in a prosecution, the fact that there was an investigation and a potential arrest would regulate journalists far better than any 'moral exultation'.
'At the same time,' he continued, 'we're going to write a very detailed letter to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court with a view to reporting her and the editor, and one of the things we will consider is, if we find that any barrister or solicitor has authorised [the article] we will make a formal complaint to the Bar Council/SRA. Our net is to catch those people who have a professional responsibility to make sure offence is not caused.'
...
When asked about Hopkins' right to exercise free speech, Herbert said the Celebrity Big Brother contestant was an opportunist who knew very well what the limitations were, but didn't care.
'This is a Sarah Palin type character who really couldn't care less. Obviously the people who do know better are The Sun and their lawyers who must have proof read [the column] before it went out. There is, I suppose, a very cynical view that actually, in the current climate of UKIP etcetera, we can say what we like about migrants and there will be no comeback or very little.'
Herbert said there was an 'appalling level of support' for migrants in the public domain, and that pre-existing soft racism and xenophobia is being tapped into and given life by UKIP and others. He also added that the issue of settlement and that of Britain's obligation under the 1951 Geneva convention were being conflated.”
http://www.solicitorsjournal.com/new...-lawyers-regul
Originally Posted by AbbieJay;77777024[B:
“ More than 700 will die in this country if people continue to be allowed to cross our border without control,[/B] including invading illegally with no way to trace them or know who they are. There could be other, less savoury reasons for sneaking into another country minus any identification.
Anyway, back to Hopkins and her hateful comments. She should not have used language like that, same as she shouldn't use hateful language about other groups of people that she does, such as ginger kids and poor people. And The Sun, well it's not the worst thing they've ever printed, they are known for it, yet people still keep buying their crappy rag and keeping them in business.”
“ More than 700 will die in this country if people continue to be allowed to cross our border without control,[/B] including invading illegally with no way to trace them or know who they are. There could be other, less savoury reasons for sneaking into another country minus any identification.
Anyway, back to Hopkins and her hateful comments. She should not have used language like that, same as she shouldn't use hateful language about other groups of people that she does, such as ginger kids and poor people. And The Sun, well it's not the worst thing they've ever printed, they are known for it, yet people still keep buying their crappy rag and keeping them in business.”
This is exactly the type of scaremongering comment that both KH and UKIP are likely to come up with as they blame immigrants for all the country's woes. Its irresponsible and illogical to even suggest 700 people will die in this country if people arrive illegally. Most of these people on the boats will try to apply for refugee status and are therefore not arriving illegally anyway.
Refugees and asylum seekers have not proven to be a security risk to this country. The 7/7 bombers were all born here - I believe - so the problem is far more deep rooted within our existing communities.
Originally Posted by AbbieJay:
“More than 700 will die in this country if people continue to be allowed to cross our borders without control, including invading illegally with no way to trace them or know who they are. There could be other, less savoury reasons for sneaking into another country minus any identification.
Anyway, back to Hopkins and her hateful comments. She should not have used language like that, same as she shouldn't use hateful language about other groups of people that she does, such as ginger kids and poor people. And The Sun, well it's not the worst thing they've ever printed, they are known for it, yet people still keep buying their crappy rag and keeping them in business.”
“More than 700 will die in this country if people continue to be allowed to cross our borders without control, including invading illegally with no way to trace them or know who they are. There could be other, less savoury reasons for sneaking into another country minus any identification.
Anyway, back to Hopkins and her hateful comments. She should not have used language like that, same as she shouldn't use hateful language about other groups of people that she does, such as ginger kids and poor people. And The Sun, well it's not the worst thing they've ever printed, they are known for it, yet people still keep buying their crappy rag and keeping them in business.”
Ok, but how will this happen and who will die???
Originally Posted by dorydaryl:
“Ok, but how will this happen and who will die???”
“Ok, but how will this happen and who will die???”
Well the UK is supposedly full, so those standing near the edge will fall off, or something.
Originally Posted by The Prumeister:
“No it isn't.
& at no point did I ever state that Hopkins has anything to do with UKIP; what I said was is that she would be ideal for their brand of hyperbole and racist rhetoric.”
“No it isn't.
& at no point did I ever state that Hopkins has anything to do with UKIP; what I said was is that she would be ideal for their brand of hyperbole and racist rhetoric.”
Oh yes it is, oh no it isn't.
It is the same. Using cherry-picked sacked ex members to support your claim that they are all racist...so KH is ideal. The same tactic could be used to state that Labour is this or that, judging by some of their ex members. I'm not arguing with you futher. 'Oh no it isn't' is not a debate.
Originally Posted by NotaTypo:
“Well the UK is supposedly full, so those standing near the edge will fall off, or something.”
“Well the UK is supposedly full, so those standing near the edge will fall off, or something.”
Heh heh...just put this on the corresponding thread in GD.
Apparently, according to some quarters, those of us who are allegedly 'OUTRAGED!!!' are also foaming at the mouth.
https://scriptedlibations.files.word...-the-mouth.jpg
^ Me (not).
Originally Posted by AbbieJay:
“Oh yes it is, oh no it isn't.
It is the same. Using cherry-picked sacked ex members to support your claim that they are all racist...so KH is ideal. The same tactic could be used to state that Labour is this or that, judging by some of their ex members. I'm not arguing with you futher. 'Oh no it isn't' is not a debate.”
“Oh yes it is, oh no it isn't.
It is the same. Using cherry-picked sacked ex members to support your claim that they are all racist...so KH is ideal. The same tactic could be used to state that Labour is this or that, judging by some of their ex members. I'm not arguing with you futher. 'Oh no it isn't' is not a debate.”
Shame.
I shall cope.
Originally Posted by AhamPrema:
“The Society of Black Lawyers”
“The Society of Black Lawyers”
I didn't know there was such a thing. Is there a Society of White Lawyers ?
Originally Posted by Porcupine:
“I didn't know there was such a thing. Is there a Society of White Lawyers ?”
“I didn't know there was such a thing. Is there a Society of White Lawyers ?”
Not that I'm aware of but The Law Society has different divisions such as Women's Lawyers, Ethnic Minority Lawyers, Lawyers with Disabilities which also work to promote equality and to support and advise particular groups. These are the SBL's founding objectives if you're interested http://www.blacklawyer.org/history/
32 of 42
