Originally Posted by Kittygodfree:
“But Hollywood knew his grandfather well and knew he had been I the army. As a genealogist myself , I find the stories from way back far more interesting than looking at a recent relative that the subject knew . It's all personal taste but the title 'who do you think you are ' leads one to believe the subject knows nothing about their heritage and needs to discover it. The U.S. Programmes in general seem to delve much further back and find relatives that the subject has no knowledge of , I personally think that is ,ore relevant to the title of this programme.”
It depends, I had just as many mysteries in the last two generations as earlier ones - some of which we only discovered in recent years.
There are probably plenty in earlier generations but we never hear of them. A few weeks I found some letters from a family member in some mid 19th Century newspapers and learnt a lot of new things.
The series has developed from the early days when an attempt was made to show people how to research their family in parish records, BMD, censuses etc but it has developed into just telling some interesting stories about famous people's background. The purists might not like that but it can make some fascinating viewing.