Sam Sophie and Dan up or The rest of the house up ?
Results:Which Eviction would have rather seen
Dan Sophie Sam
40 (35.09%)
Dexter Charlie Gina Hazel Callum The Twins
74 (64.91%)
Voters: 114. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Which Eviction would you have rather seen ?
Rest of the house by miles. 
I wouldn't miss Hazel, Charlie, Gina or the twins at all; would midly miss Callum and Dexter, but not that much.
I wouldn't miss Hazel, Charlie, Gina or the twins at all; would midly miss Callum and Dexter, but not that much.
Neither - I don't like it at all when HMs are evicted without being fairly and properly nominated.
Given the two options, however, as
a) Hazel would have gone in a predictable landslide if the rest of the house were up I reckon and
b) I rate Hazel above Dan, Sophie and Sam
then I'm bound to say Dan vs Sophie vs Sam is the lesser of two evils.
Given the two options, however, as
a) Hazel would have gone in a predictable landslide if the rest of the house were up I reckon and
b) I rate Hazel above Dan, Sophie and Sam
then I'm bound to say Dan vs Sophie vs Sam is the lesser of two evils.
Normal nominations would have been good, but that seems to be a thing of the past these days For the purposes of this poll, I would have preferred the rest of the house to be up. Not really happy with this twist, it's a bit too cruel and unfair for my liking.
For the purposes of this poll, I would have preferred the rest of the house to be up. Not really happy with this twist, it's a bit too cruel and unfair for my liking.
Originally Posted by Arcana:
“Neither - I don't like it at all when HMs are evicted without being fairly and properly nominated.
Given the two options, however, as
a) Hazel would have gone in a predictable landslide if the rest of the house were up I reckon and
b) I rate Hazel above Dan, Sophie and Sam
then I'm bound to say Dan vs Sophie vs Sam is the lesser of two evils.”
“Neither - I don't like it at all when HMs are evicted without being fairly and properly nominated.
Given the two options, however, as
a) Hazel would have gone in a predictable landslide if the rest of the house were up I reckon and
b) I rate Hazel above Dan, Sophie and Sam
then I'm bound to say Dan vs Sophie vs Sam is the lesser of two evils.”
Originally Posted by Garbanzo:
“Normal nominations would have been good, but that seems to be a thing of the past these days For the purposes of this poll, I would have preferred the rest of the house to be up. Not really happy with this twist, it's a bit too cruel and unfair for my liking.”
“Normal nominations would have been good, but that seems to be a thing of the past these days
For the purposes of this poll, I would have preferred the rest of the house to be up. Not really happy with this twist, it's a bit too cruel and unfair for my liking.”
I hate this twist!!
It's much better when they have normal nominations, can't stand it when BB keep interfering with the process!
