Originally Posted by
KittyKream:
“the people trying to justify Charlie simply because they don't like Hazel are coming across as absurd as if logic simply by passes them completely.
”
Meh. They do themselves no favours, but it's not surprising at this stage. I've never seen anything like it; but I'm hoping for an interesting couple of weeks after Hazel gets out.
Originally Posted by abarthman:
“I did and I'm still not remotely disgusted.
My "point" was that it is ridiculous for you to describe people as being "disgusting" just because you disagree with them on something so utterly trivial in the whole scheme of things.”
Cyber abuse at that level isn't trivial at all. That's not the police view, anyway. I've said it before and I'll say it again. I really, really, really hope the O'Sullivans are waiting with the best firm of lawyers they can find. It would make an exceptional test case, would this.
Originally Posted by janna:
“Because it WOULD be said on here too if there wasn't strict moderation of such things.
True dat.”
Agreed - sadly.
Originally Posted by pugamo:
“It is sick that people are gloating over the abused being villified again. They feel vindicated in their advocation of Daleys abuse. Makes me sick to my stomach. Hazel is a human being not a robot obstacle to Gina winning. What is wrong with some people.”
It's quite shocking. Hopefully people will wake up out of it when the show ends. It's like something out of a twisted version of Monty Python.