• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
There are some very disgusting people in the world.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
KittyKream
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by Pinkminxy:
“I'm taking it you didn't watch LF? Charlie prolonged the argument for AGES and was following her around from room to room. Hazel had long stopped complaining before Charlie.”

the people trying to justify Charlie simply because they don't like Hazel are coming across as absurd as if logic simply by passes them completely.
Kabuki
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by Summer Kisses:
“Aye hurt in the fact that Hazel doesn't want reminding of her part in it. I'd say more embarrassed.

You couldn't hurt Hazel if you poked her in the eye with a cucumber.”

Very true.
abarthman
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by WhyHelloWorld:
“Perhaps read the whole thread, and my reply to this thread, then come back with a point.”

I did and I'm still not remotely disgusted.

My "point" was that it is ridiculous for you to describe people as being "disgusting" just because you disagree with them on something so utterly trivial in the whole scheme of things.
Stigofthedump
28-07-2013
Hazel was in the right, and even when she mentioned charlie was 'a little bit' aggressive she didnt mean it in any nasty way.
Charlie has always been my 2nd fav but that was pure nasty of her last night, made me look back on all the times she's put her foot in it and I wonder now if it was all nasty rather than innocent.

Shame that Hazel is hated so much that people cant even rationalize .
robbies_gal
28-07-2013
i dont think charlie meant anything when she said the daley situation i think she thought she might be kicked out if she was classed as agreesive

im not saying hazel shouldnt take offence but it was a bit ott
JVS
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by WhyHelloWorld:
“People on twitter saying what Charlie said was right and about time someone brought it up!

I disagree with Hazel calling her aggressive, but what Charlie said was wrong!”

Exactly.

Some people will always side with Daley, even though HE was the unfaithful one and the aggressor. Those people are bound to side with Charlie, even if Charlie had poked Hazel's eye out.
Damanda
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by Stigofthedump:
“Hazel was in the right, and even when she mentioned charlie was 'a little bit' aggressive she didnt mean it in any nasty way.
Charlie has always been my 2nd fav but that was pure nasty of her last night, made me look back on all the times she's put her foot in it and I wonder now if it was all nasty rather than innocent.

Shame that Hazel is hated so much that people cant even rationalize .”

Wrong, there are faults on both sides here, pro Hazel people are unable to be balanced about her role in over blowing the slight Daley reference.
You have to be objective or you are just embroiled in partisan nonsense.
Damanda
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by JVS:
“Exactly.

Some people will always side with Daley, even though HE was the unfaithful one and the aggressor. Those people are bound to side with Charlie, even if Charlie had poked Hazel's eye out.”

Nobody seriously sides with Daley... Stop making stuff up, it's done and dusted, let it be.
Damanda
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by Summer Kisses:
“Bull his lips never even parted!!”

There is a lot of fibbing one here.
I do wonder at people blatantly lying about things we all watched.
ForGodsSake
28-07-2013
Originally Posted by BelindaJ:
“Charlie was aggressive and yes those who support her are just bad.”

You ARE a wum aren't you ??
gentleguy
28-07-2013
oh yes how evil of people to have a a different opinion to someone else.
BelindaJ
28-07-2013
gina has a face only her mother could love (all ten of them).
Kabuki
28-07-2013
Why does Hazel feel so offended if Charlie or anyone for that matter brings up Daley? I must admit watching the LF and Charlie trying to get some courage in confronting Hazel over the "aggressive" comment, made me think that Charlie felt a little intimidated by Hazel. Makes you wonder what actually goes on in there?
JVS
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by Damanda:
“Nobody seriously sides with Daley... Stop making stuff up, it's done and dusted, let it be.”

Oh, it's you. Surprise, surprise that you didn't agree.

If they're anti-Hazel they'll side or sympathise with Daley - his name was brought up in the argument, remember? And perhaps I should have put IMO at the end.
Miriam_R
29-07-2013
Disgusting, horrid, repulsive, nasty and vile are just some of the most overused and ott descriptions to use for hms, in previous years as well as this.
GetHoppy
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by clivefield:
“Charlie was spot on. And bringing up Daley just classic ”

People like you should me made to listen to deep conversations involving Charlie, Callum & Dexter for eternity. Disgusting.
janna
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by Rachelette:
“But we haven't said that have we? So why bring it here?”

Because it WOULD be said on here too if there wasn't strict moderation of such things.
True dat.
janna
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by abarthman:
“I did and I'm still not remotely disgusted.

My "point" was that it is ridiculous for you to describe people as being "disgusting" just because you disagree with them on something so utterly trivial in the whole scheme of things.”

So you DON'T think that saying "I'd rip Hazel's womb out " disgusting ?
Dear God in heaven. This forum is full of freaky people.
pugamo
29-07-2013
It is sick that people are gloating over the abused being villified again. They feel vindicated in their advocation of Daleys abuse. Makes me sick to my stomach. Hazel is a human being not a robot obstacle to Gina winning. What is wrong with some people.
Damanda
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by JVS:
“Oh, it's you. Surprise, surprise that you didn't agree.

If they're anti-Hazel they'll side or sympathise with Daley - his name was brought up in the argument, remember? And perhaps I should have put IMO at the end.”

I dislike Hazel, she's a horrible woman (anti Hazel is such a silly term IMO) I don't side with Daley. Nobody seriously sides with Daley
I disagree, not because its me, but because you are making things up.
As I said, don't know why I have to keep repeating myself. It's all very simple.
Damanda
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by pugamo:
“It is sick that people are gloating over the abused being villified again. They feel vindicated in their advocation of Daleys abuse. Makes me sick to my stomach. Hazel is a human being not a robot obstacle to Gina winning. What is wrong with some people.”

A hazel is a horrible girl, I've never seen her be kind,not once.
B she isn't abused
C you're taking idiots far too seriously
D it's nothing to do with gina

There is so much more wrong with what you say but the key thing is this. It's all unimportant nonsense and shouldn't even register let alone make you sick to your stomach.
Damanda
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by Rachelette:
“But we haven't said that have we? So why bring it here?”

It's ridiculous bringing up things that are said elsewhere so people can oh and ah and say how awful it is.
The worst of all the fandom this year is the people going on and on ...... And on about how badly hazel is treated.
Exaggeration you say.
RandomSally
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by Damanda:
“I dislike Hazel, she's a horrible woman (anti Hazel is such a silly term IMO) I don't side with Daley. Nobody seriously sides with Daley
I disagree, not because its me, but because you are making things up.
As I said, don't know why I have to keep repeating myself. It's all very simple.”

You're wrong. Lots of people here have and still are seriously siding with Daley.
Rachelette
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by RandomSally:
“You're wrong. Lots of people here have and still are seriously siding with Daley.”

No. Lots of people misread and draw their OWN conclusion based on the inability to read properly.

MANY of us have said Hazel contributed to that evenings debacle, but that doesn't make Daley in the right. His behaviour was wrong. I wasn't and still am not a fan of either him or Hazel.

I'm not 'siding' with him. I just don't see him as the wife beating villain some want to paint him as.
patsylimerick
29-07-2013
Originally Posted by KittyKream:
“the people trying to justify Charlie simply because they don't like Hazel are coming across as absurd as if logic simply by passes them completely.”

Meh. They do themselves no favours, but it's not surprising at this stage. I've never seen anything like it; but I'm hoping for an interesting couple of weeks after Hazel gets out.

Originally Posted by abarthman:
“I did and I'm still not remotely disgusted.

My "point" was that it is ridiculous for you to describe people as being "disgusting" just because you disagree with them on something so utterly trivial in the whole scheme of things.”

Cyber abuse at that level isn't trivial at all. That's not the police view, anyway. I've said it before and I'll say it again. I really, really, really hope the O'Sullivans are waiting with the best firm of lawyers they can find. It would make an exceptional test case, would this.

Originally Posted by janna:
“Because it WOULD be said on here too if there wasn't strict moderation of such things.
True dat.”

Agreed - sadly.

Originally Posted by pugamo:
“It is sick that people are gloating over the abused being villified again. They feel vindicated in their advocation of Daleys abuse. Makes me sick to my stomach. Hazel is a human being not a robot obstacle to Gina winning. What is wrong with some people.”

It's quite shocking. Hopefully people will wake up out of it when the show ends. It's like something out of a twisted version of Monty Python.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map