Dexter and Gina have both been good HM's but no way would I vote them to win, my vote would go to someone that I like, this year I still haven't worked out who will get my vote, it will depend who is there at the end....
Two favourites to win: One a misogynist, running strip clubs, using up to
2 of 3
Whether people vote for reasons of entertainment, sob stories or looks of a looks of a hm, is up to them. It's that some people bother to vote and sometimes even numerous times that I can't understand. My hms sometimes vote and they do it because they think they're making their mark on the show by swaying results, and I just say they're mugs for wasting their money and they know this deep down, but they just have this urge to let a hm (that will never know or meet them) know how they feel about them via a voting system which doesn't amount to great deal of people ianyway (esp if one person has voted numerous times).
Personally, as long as it's not nasty, I don't care what any of the housemates do for a job or what they're like in the real world.
To be honest, I know I'd dislike Gina and Dexter massively in real life (though Dexter would at least be interesting to talk to once). Sallie, Jackie and Daley I wouldn't want to give the time of day to. The rest just aren't the sort of people I would mix with, other than what little I've seen of Sam.
However, what I'm looking at is how much do they interest me as housemates, which is a different kettle of fish...
Gina and Dexter suddenly become great, Callum interesting in a fruit-loop way. Dan and the Twins just wore me down and became very, very irritating too quickly.
To be honest, I know I'd dislike Gina and Dexter massively in real life (though Dexter would at least be interesting to talk to once). Sallie, Jackie and Daley I wouldn't want to give the time of day to. The rest just aren't the sort of people I would mix with, other than what little I've seen of Sam.
However, what I'm looking at is how much do they interest me as housemates, which is a different kettle of fish...
Gina and Dexter suddenly become great, Callum interesting in a fruit-loop way. Dan and the Twins just wore me down and became very, very irritating too quickly.
to be honest, I didn't like Gina at 1st, but since the live feed, I just adore her, she is great, I don't care how much money she has, or where she lives, she is by far the best in there, I would like to see her win it with Callum 2njd.
Originally Posted by Nigelk:
“Also if you need to moan - have a go at BB for putting them in. Have a go at the viewers for putting them both on top on the polls week in week out (over 60% combined).. I am sure most of us have done something we are not proud of”
“Also if you need to moan - have a go at BB for putting them in. Have a go at the viewers for putting them both on top on the polls week in week out (over 60% combined).. I am sure most of us have done something we are not proud of”
Precisely. However their lifestyles flies in the face of the unfounded 'hatred' against Hazel for doing a lot less, in the house. Flirting with a serial cheater, who has cheated on all his long term relationships, to date.
Who is Gina, a paid layabout, to moralise on another HM, and very early on too and to then repeatedly demonise her character (mind you, in secret, in the DR) by saying the girl is evil, because of her 'eyes'?
Originally Posted by pepipop:
“Precisely. However their lifestyles flies in the face of the unfounded 'hatred' against Hazel for doing a lot less, in the house. Flirting with a serial cheater, who has cheated on all his long term relationships, to date.
Who is Gina, a paid layabout, to moralise on another HM, and very early on too and to then repeatedly demonise her character (mind you, in secret, in the DR) by saying the girl is evil, because of her 'eyes'?”
“Precisely. However their lifestyles flies in the face of the unfounded 'hatred' against Hazel for doing a lot less, in the house. Flirting with a serial cheater, who has cheated on all his long term relationships, to date.
Who is Gina, a paid layabout, to moralise on another HM, and very early on too and to then repeatedly demonise her character (mind you, in secret, in the DR) by saying the girl is evil, because of her 'eyes'?”
Agree Hazel is a game player but not evil! Who would Gina have left to moan about if she left this week? good television though..
Originally Posted by pepipop:
“Thank you, that was the point I was inferring in my OP.”
“Thank you, that was the point I was inferring in my OP.”
Hi,
I hope you don't mind my pointing out a little mistake, (that is very commonly made). You can't infer to someone, you can imply. Then someone can infer (deduce or take) something from what you have said/written. I'm not trying to be the 'grammar police' and hope that you don't take offence as none is intended.
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“I actually couldn't give a monkeys about what they did prior to BB and I am sure most of the public don't either... I judge them from what I see in front of me. Adam, an ex LA gang member would not have come 2nd if he was being judged on his time before BB.”
“I actually couldn't give a monkeys about what they did prior to BB and I am sure most of the public don't either... I judge them from what I see in front of me. Adam, an ex LA gang member would not have come 2nd if he was being judged on his time before BB.”
Perhaps the fact that he'd turned things around, and was helping others do the same, is part of the reason he was second?
It's more difficult to judge just on what happens in the house for some HMs than others.
Originally Posted by pepipop:
“17 women per month, a gambler, throws thousands of pounds away on drink/gambling and a hedonistic lifestyle. The other, lives (possibly because it's cheaper than paying servants) in a first class London hotel, does not work, shops most days of the week and parties, gets at least £10,000, tax free, income per month, i.e. the equivalent of a salary of a quarter of a million a year, £250,000.”
“17 women per month, a gambler, throws thousands of pounds away on drink/gambling and a hedonistic lifestyle. The other, lives (possibly because it's cheaper than paying servants) in a first class London hotel, does not work, shops most days of the week and parties, gets at least £10,000, tax free, income per month, i.e. the equivalent of a salary of a quarter of a million a year, £250,000.”
You are right, in future all HMs should be bankrupts and beggars off the street.
Originally Posted by fjif:
“Hi,
I hope you don't mind my pointing out a little mistake, (that is very commonly made). You can't infer to someone, you can imply. Then someone can infer (deduce or take) something from you have said, or written. I'm not trying to be the 'grammar police' and hope that you don't take offence as none is intended.”
“Hi,
I hope you don't mind my pointing out a little mistake, (that is very commonly made). You can't infer to someone, you can imply. Then someone can infer (deduce or take) something from you have said, or written. I'm not trying to be the 'grammar police' and hope that you don't take offence as none is intended.
”
you learn something new everyday
now go and catch some real grammar criminals, have you seen that blonde girl in the BB house
Originally Posted by Annsyre:
“You are right, in future all HMs should be bankrupts and beggars off the street.”
“You are right, in future all HMs should be bankrupts and beggars off the street.”
Or, and here's a radical idea, HM's who's lives and experiences we can relate to in some way. Why should it have to be one extreme or the other?
In any case, you've totally missed the OPs point.
Originally Posted by pepipop:
“17 women per month, a gambler, throws thousands of pounds away on drink/gambling and a hedonistic lifestyle. The other, lives (possibly because it's cheaper than paying servants) in a first class London hotel, does not work, shops most days of the week and parties, gets at least £10,000, tax free, income per month, i.e. the equivalent of a salary of a quarter of a million a year, £250,000.”
“17 women per month, a gambler, throws thousands of pounds away on drink/gambling and a hedonistic lifestyle. The other, lives (possibly because it's cheaper than paying servants) in a first class London hotel, does not work, shops most days of the week and parties, gets at least £10,000, tax free, income per month, i.e. the equivalent of a salary of a quarter of a million a year, £250,000.”
Nail on head!!
Modern BB viewers now arn't interested in their sense of values being vindicated and justice to pull through in the end..
they have an unempatheitc distanced view and are just interested in being entertained no matter if anyone has to pay...reminds me of the roman colleseum or a french beheading..
(I am aware this sounds over dramatic!)
Originally Posted by Radical Joe:
“Or, and here's a radical idea, HM's who's lives and experiences we can relate to in some way. Why should it have to be one extreme or the other?
In any case, you've totally missed the OPs point.”
“Or, and here's a radical idea, HM's who's lives and experiences we can relate to in some way. Why should it have to be one extreme or the other?
In any case, you've totally missed the OPs point.”
I didn't miss anything.
OP does not like either Gina or Dexter so started a thread just to say nasty things about them dressed up as a complaint that they have wealth.
Originally Posted by Pitman:
“you learn something new everyday
now go and catch some real grammar criminals, have you seen that blonde girl in the BB house”
“you learn something new everyday
now go and catch some real grammar criminals, have you seen that blonde girl in the BB house
”
I know people hate being told anything on a forum that is, after all, here just for entertainment, but today I just thought 'what the heck'. I've seen it said so many times and just thought for once I would try to help, even if it wasn't well received.
Originally Posted by Annsyre:
“I didn't miss anything.
OP does not like either Gina or Dexter so started a thread just to say nasty things about them dressed up as a complaint that they have wealth.”
“I didn't miss anything.
OP does not like either Gina or Dexter so started a thread just to say nasty things about them dressed up as a complaint that they have wealth.”
Yup,and Joe is just as bad. Birds of a feather flock together as they say.
Originally Posted by tomorrow:
“I didn't realise Sam ran strip clubs ....
He was 2nd in the line up wasn't he?”
“I didn't realise Sam ran strip clubs ....
He was 2nd in the line up wasn't he?”
Ohhh he's a devious one, that Sam.....
Originally Posted by SpiderMan 83:
“The OP's point is they hate Gina and Dex, check their history and you will see. Just another hate thread and nothing more. Stop defending them, you look as much of a hater as they do. Then you guys moan when someone slates Hazel. One rule for one and one for others eh?”
“The OP's point is they hate Gina and Dex, check their history and you will see. Just another hate thread and nothing more. Stop defending them, you look as much of a hater as they do. Then you guys moan when someone slates Hazel. One rule for one and one for others eh?”
I do not 'hate' Gina or Dexter, nor would/do I personally hate anyone. My posts are in relation to the continuous onslaught of accusations made against Hazel (one member of the house) - in relation to her 'immoral' behaviour. It was the irony of the situation, I was highlighting, particularly with Gina's total obsession with this same HM, by constantly referring to her as being evil.
It is the total hypocrisy of it all.
Originally Posted by ThaGazBoi:
“Isnt Sam second favourite?!”
“Isnt Sam second favourite?!”
Yes thats how you know the OP hates Gina and Dexter, that he overlooked Sam to Bash Gina and Dexter. Its pathetic really is.
What makes it worse is that these types of people like the op only moan but don't vote to save their faves. Yet has ago at other people fans cause they do vote to save their fave.
Originally Posted by SpiderMan 83:
“The OP's point is they hate Gina and Dex, check their history and you will see. Just another hate thread and nothing more. Stop defending them, you look as much of a hater as they do. Then you guys moan when someone slates Hazel. One rule for one and one for others eh?”
“The OP's point is they hate Gina and Dex, check their history and you will see. Just another hate thread and nothing more. Stop defending them, you look as much of a hater as they do. Then you guys moan when someone slates Hazel. One rule for one and one for others eh?”
Originally Posted by Annsyre:
“I didn't miss anything.
OP does not like either Gina or Dexter so started a thread just to say nasty things about them dressed up as a complaint that they have wealth.”
“I didn't miss anything.
OP does not like either Gina or Dexter so started a thread just to say nasty things about them dressed up as a complaint that they have wealth.”
Originally Posted by SpiderMan 83:
“Yes thats how you know the OP hates Gina and Dexter, that he overlooked Sam to Bash Gina and Dexter. Its pathetic really is.
What makes it worse is that these types of people like the op only moan but don't vote to save their faves. Yet has ago at other people fans cause they do vote to save their fave.”
“Yes thats how you know the OP hates Gina and Dexter, that he overlooked Sam to Bash Gina and Dexter. Its pathetic really is.
What makes it worse is that these types of people like the op only moan but don't vote to save their faves. Yet has ago at other people fans cause they do vote to save their fave.
”
Why can ye not discuss the topic raised, rather than the poster? Some people don't like Hazel, some people don't like Gina, some people don't like Dexter. They're all allowed to post threads so long as the subject is related to the show and this seems a perfectly valid topic to discuss.
Originally Posted by pepipop:
“I do not 'hate' Gina or Dexter, nor would/do I personally hate anyone. My posts are in relation to the continuous onslaught of accusations made against Hazel (one member of the house) - in relation to her 'immoral' behaviour. It was the irony of the situation, I was highlighting, particularly with Gina's total obsession with this same HM, by constantly referring to her as being evil.
It is the total hypocrisy of it all.”
“I do not 'hate' Gina or Dexter, nor would/do I personally hate anyone. My posts are in relation to the continuous onslaught of accusations made against Hazel (one member of the house) - in relation to her 'immoral' behaviour. It was the irony of the situation, I was highlighting, particularly with Gina's total obsession with this same HM, by constantly referring to her as being evil.
It is the total hypocrisy of it all.”
When you make a thread bashing either Dex or Gina its clear you hate them. ypu posts do the talkng. So saying to don't like them your only lying to yourelf.
Originally Posted by patsylimerick:
“Why can ye not discuss the topic raised, rather than the poster? Some people don't like Hazel, some people don't like Gina, some people don't like Dexter. They're all allowed to post threads so long as the subject is related to the show and this seems a perfectly valid topic to discuss.”
“Why can ye not discuss the topic raised, rather than the poster? Some people don't like Hazel, some people don't like Gina, some people don't like Dexter. They're all allowed to post threads so long as the subject is related to the show and this seems a perfectly valid topic to discuss.”
I would if the topic was sensible and not the same person bashing someone for the sake of it and its the same people over and over and over again.
Originally Posted by jacqueline_gree:
“Gina words as a personal stylist and received 2 grand a month for it.”
“Gina words as a personal stylist and received 2 grand a month for it.”
She obviously didnt go to go compare!
2 of 3
