Originally Posted by popeye13:
“See i think they look like something someone did in PAINT.NET in 15 minutes.
They look pretty bad whereas the previous graphics set looked good, it had some attention-to-detail and like someone had put alot of work into it.”
Where as I would totally disagree with this. In my opinion the previous football graphics & live DOG had a very 1990's feel to them. Where as the new graphics have a much more modern, minimalistic feel.
Plus I don't see why you seem to feel that the only reason that BT have used colour coding for the live DOG(s) is "because they can't be seen to admit they were wrong". How can they be wrong, it's their channel!
Also your arguement that the onscreen live DOG(s) are what "most people have complained about with regard to BT graphics". On forums and on twitter you may have a point, but if we are 100% honest, those of us who go on to forums and/or twitter and give opinions are the 'vocal minority'. The truth is that something like 98 people in a hundred just won't care (about onscreen graphics) in the slightest.