Originally Posted by storminmike:
“BB and BOTS are the same organisation...they can;t have it both ways....espcially swerving to slanderous commentary then "laughing it off"
I think it was the scale of the attack that surprised me. It didn't come across as probing as all other panel sessions have....it had a darker edge IMO
I don't remember Daley getting a face to face panel bashing for he had been found guilty already in the house.
This was BOTS sort of taking the law into their own hands and throwing the "bully card" around with abandon.
If we leave Ian Lee or Judy J out of the equation then what of the Dexter related panelist.....this I take real issue with as its never been done before....if she'd not said "bully" then fair enough but that's still stretching the balance....but she did....and she wasn't there for cheap shots or laughs as paid employees”
A Dexter related Panelist? i only saw the segment where Ian Lee called him a bully. Anyway i think i know what your saying, and i think your right. Bots is biased. Not a "dark edge", although admittedly the word vindictive springs to mind. Maybe Bots ganging up on what they saw as a bully, picking critical guest's, choosing the right questions, all in the name of...... It's not very professional and you have a good point here i think.
I found Bots production's judgement as fair
this time, nevertheless it's a damaging unproven allegation. Perhaps for that reason it should not be allowed/encouraged, by a responsible broadcasting company. Hmm!
As for Ian & Judy, given a green light to speak as they find by production and unless their being dishonest or insincere due to a production agenda then they have the right to call him a bully imo. Under the specific understanding that Callum signed up to be fairly judged and that is what they are doing.