|
||||||||
EastEnders - why is Sharon underused/ |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,362
|
EastEnders - why is Sharon underused/
Ever since Sharon came back from her break, she had been underused and she hasn't been mentioned in spoilers?
Why is she so underused at the moment? Sharon had always been a central character. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tipp
Posts: 1,690
|
She can't act, the producers are stuck with her for now..her big comeback was rubbish she is laughable and cringeworthy to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,674
|
I prefer it instead of her greatness damaged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Royston Vasey
Posts: 1,748
|
Quote:
She can't act, the producers are stuck with her for now..her big comeback was rubbish she is laughable and cringeworthy to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
She can't act, the producers are stuck with her for now..her big comeback was rubbish she is laughable and cringeworthy to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
She cant Act??? really these Sharon haters on here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,287
|
Quote:
She cant Act??? really these Sharon haters on here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
Well she was between 85-95 and 01-06...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,287
|
Quote:
Well she was between 85-95 and 01-06...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
Lorraine Newman has ruined Sharon not Letitia Dean
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tipp
Posts: 1,690
|
Quote:
Lorraine Newman has ruined Sharon not Letitia Dean
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
You can blame Lorraine Newman...Lorraine has not just wrecked Sharon she alomost driven the show into the ground with her poor storylines and deadwood characters...
I think you look at some the past Sharon stuff on You Tube to remind yourself, DTC will NOT axe Sharon so you wont get your wish... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,740
|
I think Letitia Dean's acting is poor. I'm glad she's "under used" and hope she is axed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
She wont be axed love...sorry you wont get your wish on this one.
They wont axe iconic characters like Sharon The best thing that has happened to Letitia Dean has happened- the departure of Lorraine Newman along with Jo Joyner and Scott Maslen. Now DTC can sit down with Letitia Dean and map a comeback for Sharon- Letitia will want to be around for the 30th anniversary so I doubt very much that you will get your wish. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
EastEnders is a dying soap and that is reflected in the fact they've destroyed their most iconic female character. The reason she's underused is because they've realised they can't write for her and have taken notice of the fact Sharon's many fans are up in arms because her comeback has been executed so badly. Standard EastEnders. They destroyed the biggest character they ever had (Dirty Den) and the linch pin of the entire series (Pauline Fowler). Sharon is a hat trick for them without even taking into consideration the near ruination of the biggest character from the 2000's (Kat) and the many senseless off screen deaths of important characters like Kathy, Cindy and Angie. Even Pat Butcher's death was unnecessary. EastEnders has no respect for its legends. You reap what you sow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
Yes Sharon is iconic and let us remember that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 15,938
|
They have no idea what to do with her. So they gave her that awful addiction storyline and had her play second fiddle to Tanya and Jack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,287
|
Quote:
Yes Sharon is* iconic and let us remember that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 232
|
Quote:
Lorraine Newman has ruined Sharon not Letitia Dean
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
|
I hate what the writers have done to our beloved Sharon. They brought her back but its clear they didn't have a clue what to do with her. I don't think Letitas acting is as good as it used to be but it isn't bad. Her character being ruined is because of ridiculous, repeititive, rushed storylines and poor writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 232
|
Quote:
I hate what the writers have done to our beloved Sharon. They brought her back but its clear they didn't have a clue what to do with her. I don't think Letitas acting is as good as it used to be but it isn't bad. Her character being ruined is because of ridiculous, repeititive, rushed storylines and poor writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
Completely agree with you here Scott...
but Lauren, Alice and Kirsty are all guess what...BRANNINGS! Alice and possibly Kirsty will be axed by DTC I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 232
|
Quote:
Completely agree with you here Scott...
but Lauren, Alice and Kirsty are all guess what...BRANNINGS! Alice and possibly Kirsty will be axed by DTC I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 329
|
Quote:
EastEnders is a dying soap and that is reflected in the fact they've destroyed their most iconic female character. The reason she's underused is because they've realised they can't write for her and have taken notice of the fact Sharon's many fans are up in arms because her comeback has been executed so badly. Standard EastEnders. They destroyed the biggest character they ever had (Dirty Den) and the linch pin of the entire series (Pauline Fowler). Sharon is a hat trick for them without even taking into consideration the near ruination of the biggest character from the 2000's (Kat) and the many senseless off screen deaths of important characters like Kathy, Cindy and Angie. Even Pat Butcher's death was unnecessary. EastEnders has no respect for its legends. You reap what you sow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,373
|
LD might not be the best actress in the world, no denying she had some ropey moments but she knows her character and can play her to the best of her abilities.
What they've done is nothing short of pissing over everything that Sharon is as a character, she been reduced to second rate fodder and extra position for months its disrespectful to the show's history and its long time viewers and too the actress to see how much they've messed her character up, writing and storylines are crap since her return, I can't see Sharon staying on for another year or two doing nothing of any substance. I hope DCT rectifies theses mistakes somehow but considering the team who brought her back is pretty much the same ones who have been there quite a few years even when she was there it doesn't bring much hope they're going to get it right. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:35.


