Originally Posted by farscape:
“I don't think this is a secret.
The idea that the ending is purposfully ambiguous as to what's happening was obvious to me and I've always seen it discussed that way on the internet.
Is Batman leaning on the joker or snapping his neck? Certainly the look on Batman's face seems to suggest something sinister and the angle of Joker's body also looks like he's going limp as if life has left him but it's supposed to be ambiguous.
Another cool moment is when their two shadows merging suggesting their both the same if not being killers but being insane. Heck despite moments before Batman 'proving' he's not insane like the joker the very act of both of them cracking up pretty much spells that in end he is.
I've always thought it interesting how DC from the beginning regarded this story as incontinuity and always wondered if the eagerness at the time to get rid of Batgirl saw 'The Killing Joke' as their best opportunity. I think Moore has even said it was never his intent to get rid of Barbera Gordon.”
The continuity thing's weird, though- doesn't he mention Batmite at one point, signalling that it's NOT actually in comics continuity, despite being the one where Barbara's crippled?
It's interesting, though, that when this came out I probably had three or maximum four people to whom I could talk about comics. There wasn't as much scope for chucking around different theories on what happened as there is now, what with the internet and everything. It was probably a lot easier for things to remain ambiguous, or even to be missed entirely.