1..Absolutely NO outside interference.
2..Anyone who discusses noms should be automatically put up
for eviction.
3..B.B. should NOT try to interfere with the nomination process.
4..Get rid of that awful BBOTS.
5..Get rid of moronic baying crowd on eviction night.
6.Employ a presenter to present the show and keep their bias
to themselves.
7.Have weekly tasks like a power of veto where a nominated hm
can save themselves or pass it on.
8.Improve the tasks and make housemates work to keep their
place in the house.
9 B.B should not be shown to favour a partucilar hm.
10 Get tough with rule breakers .

If anybody could think of any more please feel free.

11. Find new people to vote.

12. Get real celebrities in the house, no Z-Listers.

Agree with them all except 5 because it doesn't feel right without a crowd

It would help if they stopped fixing the winner.

I think they should switch the format to BB USA style for an experimental year.

Of course they'd never do it because of the money from public votes though

Stop trying to manipulate nominations with ridiculous twists. It is unfair.

If HM's spend most of their time sleeping, remove them from the house.

That and after last year it's clear the public aren't a fan of conpetitivness. They had to change the discussion of nomination rule because of the reaction it got.

Are 3 and 7 a contradiction?

Don't these two sort of contradict each other??

the public is the main problem with this show more than anything else. In all aspects!

Make a unbiased HL show.

Live feed from 12am to 2am on 5* and during weekly shopping tasks.

No more face to face nominations for me, and if they do maybe once in awhile as a twist. It was ridiculous the amount if times they did this year, novelty of it completely wore off.

No more friends and family nominations - it's been done to death at this stage.

TWO housemates with the most nominations up, more if there's a tie. Lets not just change the rules and stick people if we feel like it (i.e. Jackie)

Bring back Vote to Save.

No TWISTS every two seconds.

Award at least part of the prize fund as performance related bonuses so someone can't sit in the background for 9 weeks and scoop £100k for doing naff all but be cute. That's something I've thought for years by the way, not some sudden anti-Sam thing but I do seriously think BB have to come up with a way of stopping his brand of under-the-radar behaviour.

I would add vote to save. So sick of the radar dodgers.

No more friends and family nominations, they are stupid.

No twists - such as the ones that got Dan then Sophie evicted. In others words, STOP the interfering.

Show a fair amount of all housemates. I feel like Sam winning would not be such an abomination if he was shown more during the course of the show, unfortunately there were weeks at a time where he disappeared. I understand there are more entertaining things going on than Sam but he can't have been asleep the whole time.

That veto process should be set from the start .BB cant control who would win veto and what they would do with it if that makes any sense.

Tasks that are intelligent, last a few days and over night and are not "It's a Knockout' gunge crap.

For me the absolute biggest problem is the handing of the nominations.

There should be zero tolerance on the discussion of nominations. NOT throw them in a pretend jail/play the nominations to the house/face to face nominations/family nominations.

Nominations should be a precious and sacred thing, not something that is brandished about all over the place. They need to go back to simple diary room nominations EVERY WEEK. And when they talk about nominations, the punishment should be SERIOUS.

If they ever change formats, they should follow the BB AUS format. That is how a great series is done.

Eviction by catapult.

Hms must give valid reasons for nominations like they used to or be up themselves

No winner can be crowned on sympathy alone it is for being entertaining and interesting and a valid contribution throughout the whole process

Any experts must be totally constructive and no bias or favour to any hm whatever their personal thoughts or preferences.

BB should not manipulate edits to favour or discredit HMs and presenters to remain unbiased and professional and treat every HM at the same level and let us decide

This year there was not hardship or incentive to do tasks they were always eating and drinking - get tough on them and if they dont give 100% each in team tasks they face being up

Agree with this, the tasks on BB remind me of the show Fun house when i was a kid, just pure kids stuff, gunge and costumes = lame.

Like you say how about more intelligent tasks where the housemates have to use their brains.