• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
What did people think of the nominations rules this year?
george.millman
20-08-2013
This year, the nominations had a minimum of three people facing the public vote each week, whereas previous series had a minimum of two. Which do people prefer?

I much prefer the old way of doing it. With a minimum of three, the majority of people nominated were generally up for eviction. When it was two or more, one nomination was more likely to completely change it. I like it when it's less predictable.
Dangermoose
20-08-2013
I much prefer the 3 or more. Gives you more of a fair choice imo
missedtheshow
20-08-2013
I like a minimum of three - helps stop a voting bloc from forming.
xeo
20-08-2013
3 or more definitely. Luke A vs Lauren last year was horrible, and we would have had the same thing this year with Gina vs Dexter.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map