Originally Posted by Mark.:
“They really haven't.
The Rangers are so adamant they're not a new club, yet haven't actually put it to the test themselves from a legal point of view. Plenty of individuals and organisations have opened themselves up to liable action, if The Rangers are to be believed, but none has been forthcoming.
Funny, that.”
“They really haven't.
The Rangers are so adamant they're not a new club, yet haven't actually put it to the test themselves from a legal point of view. Plenty of individuals and organisations have opened themselves up to liable action, if The Rangers are to be believed, but none has been forthcoming.
Funny, that.”
Lord Nimmo Smith is a former Senator of the College of Justice, a judge of the Supreme Courts of Scotland, sitting in the High Court of Justiciary and the Inner House of the Court of Session. I think he might know a thing or two about the legal side of it. If Rangers weren't the same club then why was Charlie Telfer ruled to have been with them for 10 years an Dundee Utd had to pay the compensation?
As Doncaster said, it has been long settled.





