Originally Posted by robo2:
“the only one being sectarian is guidetti with his hun pish”
Lorenzo Amoruso - Hun
Neil McCann - Hun
Bertie Peacock - Not a Hun
Do you see what I did there?
Originally Posted by robo2:
“ and as for the sectarian homophobic chris graham feel free to explain how the picture which he posted was homophobic ? and feel free to provide an example of his sectarian comments? good luck with that.”
He used a picture of the Prophet masturbating a 'male' in an attempt to denigrate.
Where did I say that Graham had made sectarian comments? Problems reading what I've posted? If I was a fan of The Rangers I wouldn't be too happy with him calling other fans of the club 'mongos' and a 'cancer'.
Originally Posted by robo2:
“ i hope rangers do what celtic always does in these situations and ignores it , it seems to work for them ok, sectarian comments from guidetti, racist comments from tonev, griffiths etc, ira pish from stokes all ignored,]”
So Celtic have never commented on any of these issues? Are you really sure about that?
Originally Posted by robo2:
“ all more offensive than a retweeted picture of the prophet muhammed which is perfectly acceptable and indeed was encouraged after the charlie hebdo massacre”
If it was perfectly acceptable then the police wouldn't be investigating, Muslim groups wouldn't be complaining and The Rangers wouldn't be investigating it.
If it was perfectly acceptable it would have been dismissed out of hand.
Originally Posted by
robo2:
“so depicting a homosexual act is homophobic? excellent logic there
”
If used in an attempt to denigrate someone or something then of course it can be homophobic. Why is that so difficult to understand?
Originally Posted by
robo2:
“nope, not the behaviour id expect from a member of the rangers board, he wasnt on the board then so i have no problem with it
”
Tells us all we need to know about you.