Dundee v Celtic postponed.
Gutted, was looking forward to a good riot tonight.
Gutted, was looking forward to a good riot tonight.
Scottish Fitba Thread (Part 22)
253 of 388
No great surprise been a huge amount of rain in Dundee this month and it's not a place that gets that much rain normally
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“Ross County 5 Dundee 2
Att: 3,687
There were more people than that on one subway train into Ibrox yesterday
”
“Ross County 5 Dundee 2
Att: 3,687
There were more people than that on one subway train into Ibrox yesterday
”
Ah, the good old Attendance Cup gets rolled out again.
The population of Dingwall is about 5000 so that is almost the equivalent of 80% of the village going to the game. For The Rangers to have the equivalent of that 480000 would need to turn up at Ibrox.
Maybe the pitch at Dens is saturated after all...
https://www.facebook.com/dundeefcoff...4213573263093/
https://www.facebook.com/dundeefcoff...4213573263093/
Ball was flat or made of lead. Celtic would have wanted it postponed with their injuries and woeful form. Aberdeen to be top going into new year it is then unless they realise they are Aberdeen and bottle it again.
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“No it wasn't.”
“No it wasn't.”
No splash from the water on the pitch, fake ball. An inquiry must be held.
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“No splash from the water on the pitch, fake ball. An inquiry must be held.”
“No splash from the water on the pitch, fake ball. An inquiry must be held.”
Yes, because the Dundee groundsman carried out the inspection.
You really are becoming a parody of yourself.
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“Should maybe play some more games at 3pm on Wednesday afternoon if they are all going to end 3-4!”
“Should maybe play some more games at 3pm on Wednesday afternoon if they are all going to end 3-4!”
Apparently it was moved for a better attendance. It got 1,555...........
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“No splash from the water on the pitch, fake ball. An inquiry must be held.”
“No splash from the water on the pitch, fake ball. An inquiry must be held.”
Yeah, an inquiry should be held as to why games get called off due to storms in Scotland. Never mind, our resident football expert Frankie knows the difference between a fake ball and a real one just by watching a YouTube clip.
Originally Posted by CELT1987:
“Yeah, an inquiry should be held as to why games get called off due to storms in Scotland. Never mind, our resident football expert Frankie knows the difference between a fake ball and a real one just by watching a YouTube clip.”
“Yeah, an inquiry should be held as to why games get called off due to storms in Scotland. Never mind, our resident football expert Frankie knows the difference between a fake ball and a real one just by watching a YouTube clip.”
It was a joke. Thought you Irish were famed for your craic!
Originally Posted by big bro geek:
“Apparently it was moved for a better attendance. It got 1,555...........”
“Apparently it was moved for a better attendance. It got 1,555...........”
More in the queue for the urinals at Ibrox on Monday. That game should be a TV blackout to save the embarrassment to the league.
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“ Aberdeen to be top going into new year it is then unless they realise they are Aberdeen and bottle it again.”
“ Aberdeen to be top going into new year it is then unless they realise they are Aberdeen and bottle it again.”
Thought they'd bottle it and they lived up to low expectations.
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“Thought they'd bottle it and they lived up to low expectations.”
“Thought they'd bottle it and they lived up to low expectations.”
They had 5 shots on goal though Frankie, using your Zombienomics they should have won 6-0.
Originally Posted by timboy:
“They had 5 shots on goal though Frankie, using your Zombienomics they should have won 6-0.”
“They had 5 shots on goal though Frankie, using your Zombienomics they should have won 6-0.
”
Put the Seville calculator down and try using some logic. An open goal miss that hit the bar from 2 yards out would go down as a worse chance than a slow and on target daisy cutter from 40 yards out using your logic. Not really got a hang of this football lark have you?
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“Put the Seville calculator down and try using some logic. An open goal miss that hit the bar from 2 yards out would go down as a worse chance than a slow and on target daisy cutter from 40 yards out using your logic. Not really got a hang of this football lark have you?”
“Put the Seville calculator down and try using some logic. An open goal miss that hit the bar from 2 yards out would go down as a worse chance than a slow and on target daisy cutter from 40 yards out using your logic. Not really got a hang of this football lark have you?”
You and logic, like oil and water.
4 shots on goal, no OGs yet they should have scored 5 goals.
You dun goofed.
Originally Posted by timboy:
“You and logic, like oil and water.
4 shots on goal, no OGs yet they should have scored 5 goals.
You dun goofed.”
“You and logic, like oil and water.
4 shots on goal, no OGs yet they should have scored 5 goals.
You dun goofed.”
8 shots on goal and 4 on target, learn the difference between the two. Using your logic if they had 8 shots and hit the bar or the post 8 times and the opposition had 1 shot from the halfway line that trickled into the keeper's arms then they would deserve to win because it was on target.
The same way Moult should have had a hat trick when Motherwell pumped you, but he missed an easy chance and was off target.
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“8 shots on goal and 4 on target, learn the difference between the two. Using your logic if they had 8 shots and hit the bar or the post 8 times and the opposition had 1 shot from the halfway line that trickled into the keeper's arms then they would deserve to win because it was on target.
The same way Moult should have had a hat trick when Motherwell pumped you, but he missed an easy chance and was off target.”
“8 shots on goal and 4 on target, learn the difference between the two. Using your logic if they had 8 shots and hit the bar or the post 8 times and the opposition had 1 shot from the halfway line that trickled into the keeper's arms then they would deserve to win because it was on target.
The same way Moult should have had a hat trick when Motherwell pumped you, but he missed an easy chance and was off target.”
How many shots on target did Celtic have in that game Francis?
Why shouldn't they have scored with all of those as you believe Motherwell should have scored with all of theirs plus others that weren't on target?
A far from vintage performance but Celtic kept on going despite the sending off and got a winner to put the pressure on Aberdeen.
Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“Ross County 5 Dundee 2
Att: 3,687”
“Ross County 5 Dundee 2
Att: 3,687”
Dumbarton v The Rangers
Att: 1894
Originally Posted by timboy:
“A far from vintage performance but Celtic kept on going despite the sending off and got a winner to put the pressure on Aberdeen.”
“A far from vintage performance but Celtic kept on going despite the sending off and got a winner to put the pressure on Aberdeen.”
I watched it online. I thought if anyone was gonna score a late winner it would be Partick. Plenty of corners, crosses and throwing men forward but as soon as that ball looped towards Griffiths you knew he would score.
253 of 388
