DS Forums

 
 

Scottish Fitba Thread (Part 22)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19-05-2014, 19:37
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
Does that mean Kenny Shiels will end up at Clyde?
More likely in the Clyde I'd have thought.
timboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 20-05-2014, 18:16
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
Stv now reporting spfl paying broadcasters £250k a season for them to show lower league football.
bhoy07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2014, 18:48
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
Stv now reporting spfl paying broadcasters £250k a season for them to show lower league football.
But The Rangers are "the only show in town" - surely the SPFL should be fighting off the broadcasters willing to pay them?
Mark. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2014, 19:44
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
But The Rangers are "the only show in town" - surely the SPFL should be fighting off the broadcasters willing to pay them?
The money is for setting up broadcasting facilities at grounds where they don't usually broadcast from I think.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2014, 20:46
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
The money is for setting up broadcasting facilities at grounds where they don't usually broadcast from I think.
But surely subscribers and advertisers should be throwing themselves at BT, meaning they can more than cover such costs?

Anyway, other reports are suggesting it's payments that are triggered if viewing figures don't reach a certain (very low) level.
Mark. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2014, 23:01
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
But surely subscribers and advertisers should be throwing themselves at BT, meaning they can more than cover such costs?

Anyway, other reports are suggesting it's payments that are triggered if viewing figures don't reach a certain (very low) level.

The Scottish Professional Football League is contractually bound to pay BT Sport up to £250,000 per season in return for the broadcaster airing Rangers matches.

STV understands that under the terms of a renegotiated TV deal following the removal of Rangers from the top flight in 2012, a clause was inserted making the league liable to additional production costs incurred setting up at lower league grounds.

It is understood the league agreed to the insertion of the clause in order to guarantee broadcast contracts which were essentially null and void after Rangers were expelled from the then-Scottish Premier League and were subsequently admitted to the bottom tier of the Scottish Football League.

The SPL paid the Scottish Football League £800,000 for one season's worth of rights to show Rangers games but that deal was absorbed when the league bodies merged in 2013.

It is not known how much has been paid out to BT Sport and ESPN, who were the holders of the contract for the 2012/13 season, to date. The overall payment is capped at £250,000 per season.

In a statement to STV, SPFL chief executive Neil Doncaster said: "The support given to Scottish football by our broadcast partners, in 2012 and since, has been fundamental to the ongoing health of the game in this country."

It is understood the league thought it necessary to agree to the deal in order to protect revenue from broadcast contracts.

Nevertheless, the revelations in short mean the SPFL pays a broadcaster in order for Rangers games to be shown on television.

BT Sport said in a statement: “[We] were delighted to inherit the SPFL rights from ESPN at the beginning of this season, however we cannot comment on contractual details.”
The deal relying on certain viewing figures sounds made up as how do you gauge how many are watching in packed pubs etc. Looking at it from a football drama point of view the Championship looks a far more marketable league than the Scottish Premiership which is essentially over before a ball is kicked. If Hibs come down it will have the biggest game in Scotland potentially.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2014, 23:18
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
And of course a league is always all about who wins it.

The whole "Championship will be better/more interesting/more marketable" claptrap is just that. But the media are lapping it up.

It makes me want Hibs to beat Hamilton, just to destroy their dream.
Mark. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2014, 23:47
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
But The Rangers are "the only show in town" - surely the SPFL should be fighting off the broadcasters willing to pay them?
The 500,000,000 must all be watching on illegal streams.
timboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 00:05
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
And of course a league is always all about who wins it.

The whole "Championship will be better/more interesting/more marketable" claptrap is just that. But the media are lapping it up.

It makes me want Hibs to beat Hamilton, just to destroy their dream.
You can't seriously think the Scottish Premiership is of any interest commercially? Celtic will win it by 30 points and second is like telling you who finished 3rd bottom or you were runner up in the cup. The Championship looks a real tussle between Rangers/Hearts/Falkirk/Hamilton or Hibs. All of those teams could potentially win the league and with Craig Levein at Hearts and Hibs maybe coming down there's a real drama there. Rangers will be playing a majority of full time teams and even tricky part time teams like Dumbarton or Cowdenbeath will play their part.

I'd watch the Championship's guaranteed top game of Hearts vs Rangers ahead of any Scottish Premiership game.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 00:16
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
You can't seriously think the Scottish Premiership is of any interest commercially?
Who has the bigger commercial deals attached to it? The Premiership or the Championship?
timboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 00:31
indiana44
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 8,451
You can't seriously think the Scottish Premiership is of any interest commercially? Celtic will win it by 30 points and second is like telling you who finished 3rd bottom or you were runner up in the cup. The Championship looks a real tussle between Rangers/Hearts/Falkirk/Hamilton or Hibs. All of those teams could potentially win the league and with Craig Levein at Hearts and Hibs maybe coming down there's a real drama there. Rangers will be playing a majority of full time teams and even tricky part time teams like Dumbarton or Cowdenbeath will play their part.

I'd watch the Championship's guaranteed top game of Hearts vs Rangers ahead of any Scottish Premiership game.
Gee, it's quite difficult to imagine that anyone would want promoted out of such a Utopia ( or car crash meeting place )
indiana44 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 00:44
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
Gee, it's quite difficult to imagine that anyone would want promoted out of such a Utopia ( or car crash meeting place )
Never a truer word spoken.

I want Celtic relegated so we can have a crack at the Ramsden's Cup and play at Central Park the season after next.
timboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 00:57
indiana44
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 8,451
Never a truer word spoken.

I want Celtic relegated so we can have a crack at the Ramsden's Cup and play at Central Park the season after next.
I was personally quite devastated when St Mirren so inappropriately started winning games at just the wrong time.

Not getting into the Championship made Danny Lennon's position untenable.
indiana44 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 07:27
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
Who has the bigger commercial deals attached to it? The Premiership or the Championship?
You can hardly compare a league carrying 3 part time teams to a full time league with 2 more teams in it, you're at a major disadvantage commercially straight away. The Scottish Premiership can't attract sponsorship though despite these advantages and that's partly because of no Rangers and no competition. It's won before a ball is kicked.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 07:33
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
Gee, it's quite difficult to imagine that anyone would want promoted out of such a Utopia ( or car crash meeting place )
This coming season you count many empty seats there are at Celtic Park. Now if Rangers get promoted next season count how many empty seats there are at the first or second Celtic vs Rangers match. The tickets will be like gold dust. It's churlish to think the Premiership is really great without Rangers. It has no sponsor, no drama and no competition.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 07:36
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
Never a truer word spoken.

I want Celtic relegated so we can have a crack at the Ramsden's Cup and play at Central Park the season after next.
As I said count how many empty seats there are at the next Celtic vs Rangers game and tell me you didn't miss Rangers. If you didn't then why weren't all your games costing £42 quid and selling out?
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 07:43
CELT1987
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10,241
This coming season you count many empty seats there are at Celtic Park. Now if Rangers get promoted next season count how many empty seats there are at the first or second Celtic vs Rangers match. The tickets will be like gold dust. It's churlish to think the Premiership is really great without Rangers. It has no sponsor, no drama and no competition.
When Rangers were last in the SPL, only games to sell out were Old Firm games. Rest of Celtic's home games weren't full capacity. It will be the same, even if The Rangers come back in season after next.
CELT1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 07:52
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
I was personally quite devastated when St Mirren so inappropriately started winning games at just the wrong time.

Not getting into the Championship made Danny Lennon's position untenable.
Yeah it's an enviable position to be in winning 10 whole games and hovering over the trap door every season. You might at least have a chance at the Championship title and see your team win games. You've got no chance of the Premiership league and a tiny chance of top 6. It's bottom 6 for St Mirren with you being lucky if you don't finish bottom 2 as you don't have a get out of jail card in Hearts next season who won as many games as you despite all their problems.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 10:35
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
You can hardly compare a league carrying 3 part time teams to a full time league with 2 more teams in it, you're at a major disadvantage commercially straight away. The Scottish Premiership can't attract sponsorship though despite these advantages and that's partly because of no Rangers and no competition. It's won before a ball is kicked.
Is that the sound of backtracking I hear? You were the one who said the Premiership is of no interest commercially.

As I said count how many empty seats there are at the next Celtic vs Rangers game and tell me you didn't miss Rangers. If you didn't then why weren't all your games costing £42 quid and selling out?
That posts literally makes no sense. Before Rangers were placed into liquidation and died they were our rivals. Of course more people are going to attend a game against their clubs biggest rivals. It is the same throughout all leagues.

Yeah it's an enviable position to be in winning 10 whole games and hovering over the trap door every season. You might at least have a chance at the Championship title and see your team win games. You've got no chance of the Premiership league and a tiny chance of top 6. It's bottom 6 for St Mirren with you being lucky if you don't finish bottom 2 as you don't have a get out of jail card in Hearts next season who won as many games as you despite all their problems.
St Mirren got £1005142 in prize money this year, if they were to get relegated and then win the Championship they would get £386248, figures based on this years prize money. £620k would be a huge whole for St Mirren.
timboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 12:49
Hibs-kid-2007
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 7,473
I have a question

Yesterday I read in the daily record and online that the Hibs v Hamilton were able to be beamed free as sky and BT have fulfilled their contractual obligations. Does this mean they will be available free to air? Or just that sky don't have to pay to broadcast it?

I'm giving my mate sky go login but might not be necessary.
Hibs-kid-2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 14:00
farmer bob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The United Kingdom
Posts: 14,997
Good luck to Hamilton tonight, be great to have Hibernian in the Championship next season along with Hearts & Rangers.
Never thought the Sons would ever be competing in a League with these teams again.
Slap me
farmer bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 14:57
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
Is that the sound of backtracking I hear? You were the one who said the Premiership is of no interest commercially.
It doesn't even have a sponsor.

That posts literally makes no sense. Before Rangers were placed into liquidation and died they were our rivals. Of course more people are going to attend a game against their clubs biggest rivals. It is the same throughout all leagues.
They are still the same club and that will be reflected in the attendance at Celtic Park when you play them, the ticket price, the police presence and the coverage and the commercial deals to go with it. It's the elephant in the room that they are the same club and people seem to be just denying it for some reason beyond me.

St Mirren got £1005142 in prize money this year, if they were to get relegated and then win the Championship they would get £386248, figures based on this years prize money. £620k would be a huge whole for St Mirren.
But that's like getting humped every week and showing people the balance sheet and giving a thumbs up. The Championship looks undeniably to be the most evenly matched and most exciting league in Scotland next season by quite some distance. I don't know what the hole in the finances would be at the end of next season but from a footballing point of view it's good to see your team on a winning streak and a chance at winning a league rather than just keeping your head above water.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 15:24
detroitcity
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,306
I'm gutted that after all those years of Aberdeen being p1sh and flirting with relegation we finally become decent and didn't get the chance to play in football's holy grail.

The chance to play against the best players in Scotland, qualify for Europe and earn a decent bit of cash for a high finish all pale into insignificance when I think about the prospect of the Blue Brazil rolling up to Pittodrie in a fleet of Ford Fiesta's.

I will scan the Championship's scores on a Sunday morning in the paper but only after I've read my horoscope and Dear Deirdre. That's about my interest level in it and probably many others outwith fans of Championship teams.
detroitcity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 15:30
detroitcity
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,306

But that's like getting humped every week and showing people the balance sheet and giving a thumbs up. The Championship looks undeniably to be the most evenly matched and most exciting league in Scotland next season by quite some distance. I don't know what the hole in the finances would be at the end of next season but from a footballing point of view it's good to see your team on a winning streak and a chance at winning a league rather than just keeping your head above water.
This sounds like 'winning is everything and who cares about the finances'.

I remember another team trying this strategy.

Winning is not everything, Saints staying up is probably a massive victory for their fans, throw in a cup run or two and it's a great season.

Rangers are 1/6 on to win the league so the bookies don't think it'll be anywhere near as competitive or exciting as League 1 or 2 will be.
detroitcity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 17:30
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
I'm gutted that after all those years of Aberdeen being p1sh and flirting with relegation we finally become decent and didn't get the chance to play in football's holy grail.

The chance to play against the best players in Scotland, qualify for Europe and earn a decent bit of cash for a high finish all pale into insignificance when I think about the prospect of the Blue Brazil rolling up to Pittodrie in a fleet of Ford Fiesta's.

I will scan the Championship's scores on a Sunday morning in the paper but only after I've read my horoscope and Dear Deirdre. That's about my interest level in it and probably many others outwith fans of Championship teams.
A pedestrian Motherwell side pipped you to second condemning you to play and probably go out of Europe against a team you've probably never even heard of. You're hardly strolling into the Champions League group stages with £80 million banked. Just try not to do too much damage to the coefficient.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:11.