|
||||||||
Is it Lorraine Newman's fault for the decline of EE or was it Bryan Kirkwood's fault? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South West England
Posts: 4,624
|
Is it Lorraine Newman's fault for the decline of EE or was it Bryan Kirkwood's fault?
I have seen a lot of criticism towards Lorraine Newman. Lorraine Newman didn't improve the show. She created boring characters and boring storylines.
Having said this, I think Bryan Kirkwood ruined the show more than Lorraine Newman did. What are your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,566
|
Kirkwood really had no idea how to run Eastenders and the rot set in. Newman was just keeping and playing it safe with character development but no real story or any drama or action at all (until now which is ironic that she was replaced!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cell Block H
Posts: 11,878
|
Bryan Kirkwood. He overhauled the show to a level it didn't need overhauling to. Then there was all his stop and start storyline policy. So nothing ever moved forward and the characters all had their personalities changed to suit whatever storyline they were playing out on the day. That sort of thing might work on Hollyoaks but it didn't on EE. Half of the writers he brought in had no idea what this show was and they certainly had no history of the characters they were writing for.
This is without the recasts, axings of important background characters and weird, yet vile, set revamps he did. That jungle of Phil's living room is still a wtf moment. It distracted from everything else taking place. Likewise with the sea and palm tree wall in Kat and Alfie's front room. Your eyes were on that. Not those two or the scenes they were playing out. The show changed completely under BKs term in charge and still hasn't recovered. Ratings don't drop overnight. Its always a gradual drop off. Where EE is at today is because of 3 and a half long years of mismanagement. Newman gets stick but she has taken characters back to a pre 2010 state and has changed all of the sets he introduced apart from the downstairs of The Vic. I suspect a change there will happen once Dominic has his feet under the table. Storylines could be better but its getting there slowly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,406
|
Quote:
Bryan Kirkwood. He overhauled the show to a level it didn't need overhauling to. Then there was all his stop and start storyline policy. So nothing ever moved forward and the characters all had their personalities changed to suit whatever storyline they were playing out on the day. That sort of thing might work on Hollyoaks but it didn't on EE. Half of the writers he brought in had no idea what this show was and they certainly had no history of the characters they were writing for.
This is without the recasts, axings of important background characters and weird, yet vile, set revamps he did. That jungle of Phil's living room is still a wtf moment. The show changed completely under his term in charge and still hasn't recovered. Ratings don't drop overnight. Its always a gradual drop off. Where EE is at today is because of 3 and a half long years of mismanagement. Newman gets stick but she has taken characters back to a pre 2010 state and has changed all of the sets he introduced apart from the downstairs of The Vic. I suspect a change there will happen once Dominic has his feet under the table. Storylines could be better but its getting there slowly. In 2010 the show was in a relatively healthy state - passed it's best days but still capable of great things. Kirkwood came from behind and slit its throat. Newman tried to her best to save the patient from dying and just about managed to stabilise things. It just needs an adrenaline boost of good stories, which will hopefully come from DTC. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,764
|
1.Harwood (then and now)
2.Yorke (as controller of BBC drama 2005-2013) 3.Santer (papered over the cracks instead of fixing things) 4.Ashdown (obsessed with Branning domination) 5.Kirkwood/Newman (equally crap) In that order. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 418
|
I think it's unfair to blame one person. It's writers, storyliners, even some of the actors that should all share the blame. I think eastenders will come good eventually. They will need to realise that it'll be a few months before viewers will return though as its been poor for ages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,065
|
Kirkwood came in 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,793
|
Kirkwood get's too much flack on here... He did some great episodes and introduced some good characters... Much better then Newman
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The kitchen, eating a biscuit
Posts: 9,755
|
Newman gets a lot of unfair stick on here, the work we're seeing at the minute is hers and it's absolutely fantastic. I really do think that she's gone too soon, she took charge of the show when it was in a really bad state and had to fix all of that before she could move the show forward.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,777
|
They were both JUST AWFUL in there own unique, wonderful ways:sleep:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,091
|
I'd say Kirkwoods. Although his era, in comparison to Newmans, was technically the lesser of two evils, I do think he assasinated so many characters during his time. So when Newman took over she had to repair alot of damage and also she inherrited a cast with a lot of broken families - all thanks to him IMO. I'd say his stories were better than Newmans but thats very few and in between. Where there was gold dust it was usually followed by three piles of shit. :sleep: Quote:
Where EE is at today is because of 3 and a half long years of mismanagement.
Nail on head.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,701
|
I think Bryan Kirkwood got the show in a corner when he left, and Lorraine Newman hasn't been brave enough to get it out. Dominic Treadwell Collins is all about sensationalism, so you may get shocked by his story lines, but we don't want another Brookside...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,362
|
Quote:
Kirkwood get's too much flack on here... He did some great episodes and introduced some good characters... Much better then Newman
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,701
|
Quote:
The only good characters he created is Michael, Lola and Vanessa IMO. Most of his new characters have been flops. While he did create great episodes, the majority of his episodes were terrible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,091
|
Quote:
Dominic Treadwell Collins is all about sensationalism, so you may get shocked by his story lines, but we don't want another Brookside...
Tanya buring Max, who's the father of Heathers baby, Who killed Archie's, Stax, Lucy's rebellion/Ian getting stalked/kidnapped and Lucas's mass murdering spree but he also gave us... Whitney's abuse by Tony Ronnie/Danielle/Archie Syed's struggle with his sexuality Stacey's bi-polar Stella abusing Ben. I'd say that's pretty much a mixed bag of stories but at least for ALL of them, he got the nation talking. I'm not suggesting he now inject the show with OTT stories but I do think something needs to happen to get "everyone talking about it", while also giving us that dark gritty kitchen sink drama. DTC in the past has shown that he can deliver a range of different stories - some pulling on the emotional heartstrings, some dark and controversial but true to life subjects and some there for the shock factor. I really do think that he's the man for the job. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,547
|
Bryan Kirkwood, he's an absolutely horrendous producer and an unpopular opinion on here but I've found his time on Hollyoaks this year just as bad
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,793
|
Quote:
I disagree that DTC is ALL about sensationalism. How he got this reputation on DS, I'll never know. I mean sure he had his moments.
Tanya buring Max, who's the father of Heathers baby, Who killed Archie's, Stax, Lucy's rebellion/Ian getting stalked/kidnapped and Lucas's mass murdering spree but he also gave us... Whitney's abuse by Tony Ronnie/Danielle/Archie Syed's struggle with his sexuality Stacey's bi-polar Stella abusing Ben. I'd say that's pretty much a mixed bag of stories but at least for ALL of them, he got the nation talking. I'm not suggesting he now inject the show with OTT stories but I do think something needs to happen to get "everyone talking about it", while also giving us that dark gritty kitchen sink drama. DTC in the past has shown that he can deliver a range of different stories - some pulling on the emotional heartstrings, some dark and controversial but true to life subjects and some there for the shock factor. I really do think that he's the man for the job. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,091
|
Quote:
that was Santer not Treadmill
but DTC was his right-hand man. He was the brains behind the stories. He created them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Is this the first time a thread like this has been posted or the 50,000th? I think the latter. Sorry, I'm not trying to be nasty but this topic has been discussed several times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,174
|
Kirkwood. As so many have said Newman gets so much flack on here for doing exactly what I believe she was instructed to do which was recompose, restablise and leave the show for her successor to come in and rejuvenate the show.
She had to redeem countless characters that Kirkwood had assassinated, namely Kat who I think DSers have unanimously agreed is back to her former self. She had to end awful stories such as Kat's affair. She hasn't been spectacular but after a decent stream of storylines over the last few weeks I think we can say she has done a satisfactory job. I also disagree that Kirkwood created decent characters - only Vanessa, Lola and Michael have been successful and I would say that's more to do with the actors than Kirkwood's stories. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,091
|
Quote:
I also disagree that Kirkwood created decent characters - only Vanessa, Lola and Michael have been successful and I would say that's more to do with the actors than Kirkwood's stories.
Robinson gave us Steve Owen York gave us the Slaters Berridge gave us Dennis Rickman and Stacey Slater. Santer - The Mitchell sisters and the Masoods Kirkwoods succesful characters, though likable, are rather tame compared to the blockbuster characters (and stories) that other EP's have produced. I think it all went downhill after he introduced the goon brothers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,566
|
Quote:
I also disagree that Kirkwood created decent characters - only Vanessa, Lola and Michael have been successful and I would say that's more to do with the actors than Kirkwood's stories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,174
|
Quote:
Vanessa had potential if they stuck to her story and not ended up as a pawn in the cycle that is Max and Tanya love life (or the new Den and Angie as Kirkwood called them
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,174
|
I'd also argue that Newman has created better characters than Kirkwood even if some were only guests. The likes of Carl, Tara and Sadie as well as the reintroduction of Peter.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 838
|
Quote:
I'd also argue that Newman has created better characters than Kirkwood even if some were only guests. The likes of Carl, Tara and Sadie as well as the reintroduction of Peter.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:45.



