• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
The Rovers
Petro
14-09-2013
So, the truth is out and the scene has been set for Stella to start thinking about selling the Rovers. If Steve buys it, should Liz take over as Landlady on her return or would it make for more interesting viewing if she had to play second fiddle to Michelle? She is getting a bit sick of things at the factory with Peter joining the workforce after all.
What do you think?
Bobby_Marz
14-09-2013
Originally Posted by Petro:
“So, the truth is out and the scene has been set for Stella to start thinking about selling the Rovers. If Steve buys it, should Liz take over as Landlady on her return or would it make for more interesting viewing if she had to play second fiddle to Michelle? She is getting a bit sick of things at the factory with Peter joining the workforce after all.
What do you think?”

SPOILERS'

Steve Does by it and LIZ does run it
Petro
14-09-2013
Thanks Bobby, but I know the spoiler. Just wondered if everyone though it was going to be as plain sailing as that. Michelle's not going to last much longer at the factory I don't think.
Reality Sucks
14-09-2013
Originally Posted by Bobby_Marz:
“SPOILERS'

Spoiler
Steve Does by it and LIZ does run it
”

You are supposed to put spoilers in tags
The_Sleeper
14-09-2013
Originally Posted by Reality Sucks:
“You are supposed to put spoilers in tags ”

you just cant get the staff, these days !
Pyramidbread
14-09-2013
The name above the door will be...

Spoiler
Michelle Connor and Steve McDonald, I think it will be like Fred Elliott's days, where Fred was landlord, and Shelley was the manager. Except with Steve and Michelle as landlord and lady and Liz as manager
double-helix
14-09-2013
Steve will never be licensee or the legal 'landlord'. It is against the law for him to be.
Scorpio2
14-09-2013
Originally Posted by double-helix:
“Steve will never be licensee or the legal 'landlord'. It is against the law for him to be.”

Why is that?
tracyluv101
14-09-2013
Originally Posted by Scorpio2:
“Why is that?”

Because he is an ex con
That's why liz was licence the last time he owned it
Pyramidbread
14-09-2013
Originally Posted by double-helix:
“Steve will never be licensee or the legal 'landlord'. It is against the law for him to be.”

His name is above the door though
http://i.imgur.com/D7vIwSx.png
double-helix
15-09-2013
Originally Posted by Pyramidbread:
“His name is above the door though
http://i.imgur.com/D7vIwSx.png”

When was that above the door and when was the picture taken. But it is still fact that he would never be given a license in the real world.
Pyramidbread
15-09-2013
Originally Posted by double-helix:
“When was that above the door and when was the picture taken. But it is still fact that he would never be given a license in the real world.”

A few weeks ago
Paul_Howard1
15-09-2013
It will be nice to see
Spoiler
Liz back behind the bar
Petro
15-09-2013
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/late...-Rovers-Return

This was printed in March
jackol
15-09-2013
Originally Posted by double-helix:
“When was that above the door and when was the picture taken. But it is still fact that he would never be given a license in the real world.”

Why?Where are you getting this info from? An unspent conviction would lead to a refusal of a license but not a spent one
A criminal record is not an automatic bar to a license but offences which are related to the sale of alcohol (previous licencing offences, tax & VAT offences, etc) would, almost certainly, result in a refusal. Offences of violence will will be closely looked at, bearing in mind a licencees relationship with the public. In the case of an affray, they would consider your age at the time of the offence, the amount of time which has elapsed since the conviction and your general standing in the community.
Pyramidbread
15-09-2013
Funny how that ended up being true despite them denying it at the time, lol.
Petro
15-09-2013
I wouldn't mind seeing Michelle as landlady. It's about time she was involved in some good stroylines
actual_soap
15-09-2013
There was a whole,story about it last time, that's why Liz's name went above the door
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map