Originally Posted by
mmpfb:
“Haha. I just remember discussing something with you before. You stuck in my mind as one of the more articulate and reasonable fans-of-other-contestants
”
That's probably the nicest thing anyone's ever said to me
And likewise, you're my favourite poster on this forum
I'm sure there's a hashtag to be found in all this.
Quote:
“It really is a mystery. Sometimes I wonder whether it was because they felt Nick wasn't ready for the pressure that comes with it, but I don't know that that makes any sense either. I mean, if so, why not say something along those lines 'you have beautiful voice but you're not quite ready' or something. If someone is winning votes, is a brilliant singer and has a big teenage girly backing as well as those of us who appreciate his fine voice, surely THAT has the potential to rake in a tonne of cash.”
I'm skeptial about the 'you're not ready' angle because I don't think these people would give the slightest toss, they put children in these competitions knowing full well what awaits them, and surely either side would think it would be better for a child that got far in the show to have all the protection that a big record label with full on PR could give than just be sitting at home with a pissed off mother with a direct line to the Daily Record.
Quote:
“Which outburst? I don't remember an outburst. Louis or Nicholas?”
There was one results night when Sam C got through first of the three boys and Louis said something I couldn't hear but I've seen people say was 'well we all know how this is going now', and you could hear Nick say quite angrilly 'don't say that'. There was definitely something going on that night, I just have no idea what.
Quote:
“Yeah I don't get Louis at all. I can only think he must be a massive control freak. Why would he say early on he thinks Nicholas could win the show, only to quite blatantly throw him under a bus later on?
And yeah, I agree with you about Luke. Louis having tipped him for the win was very odd when looked at next to his early bugging up of Nicholas. The underdog narrative seems likely.
I think the Tamera thing is just evidence of the fundamental contradiction of the show. In all honesty I think she probably had a contract on the table before even auditioning. In many ways she's perfect for them, an avatar for whichever producer wants to stick on their record to help sell it. Her lack of charisma, ability to sing in tune (or indeed ability to remember lyrics) will matter little when presented in highly stylised music videos. They'll have taken one look at her and had dollar signs popping out of their eyes. I think she must have been brought on board mainly for the exposure - if they could have got her to win it then that would have been all fine and dandy, but I guess after the first couple of live shows it became clear that was never going to happen.”
Tamera is only thing I've ever disagreed with you about! Although I doubt myself given your knowledge/insight into the whole area. But apparently the groups turnout was so abysmal that they had to run special groups-only auditions to try to find something to put through to the next stage (
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...hy-groups.html behind a paywall how helpful, via
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X_F..._10)#Auditions). Tamera's 'group' (Silver Rock?) was 'together' for a week before they auditioned; in other words, they weren't a group, just two chancers. She's a - whatever the female equivalent of a wide boy is - that went along for the audition with her pal for shits and giggles and a tiny fragment of dream, and they took one look at her and ran with it. And you're right, zero charisma, not that good a singer, and utterly banal. I think they thought they'd found something amazing, tried to push it and realised they were wrong, and let her hang with a bottom of deadlock NO ONE ANYWHERE EVEN LIKES YOU YOU LOSER outcome that's surely deadly for any kind of future career.
Quote:
“Yeah, it's an 'othering' thing, for sure. Plus anyone English who might be inclined to vote for Nick on his talent could easily be lulled into a false sense of security thinking 'Oh I don't need to vote because all the Scots will be anyway'.”
Very true. Except we're not, because we're voting for Luke

*Louis Walsh explodes in confusion* if only
Quote:
“Argh it's so frustrating. It will really stick out if Nick doesn't get signed while Luke and (especially) Tamera do. Worried what all that would do to Nick's self-confidence and sense of fair-play too. Plus, I just want to be able to buy his records tbh.”
Even if I wasn't a fan I think I could see why Luke would be signed. Tamera, no way, unless they put her on a retainer and tell her to come back in a few years (if that still happens?) if she happens to discover some charisma, memory, dance skills, etc etc... But like you say, she's an avatar, there's nothing to her and nothing about her. There are scottish labels that I think would look at Nick quite seriously though, though whether that's what he'd want or not is something else. I wouldn't want it if I could get a 'proper' deal (I say as someone who will vote for independence).
Quote:
“Someone summed it up really well in the comments on the Sofabet voting stats analysis. They said 'So essentially the entire series was about stopping a 16/17 year old from winning' which seems about right. It's horribly depressing that pure talent and, it seems, a good kid, can be shafted like that right in plain view.”
I saw that comment and it summed it up perfectly. I just don't understand WHY