• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Have all the people who said Gina's back story is fake, been vindicated yet?
<<
<
206 of 206
>>
>
Hicky
26-01-2014
[quote=cobis;71036781]
Originally Posted by Hicky:
“
but if it is a programme about Gina's current life what would be the point if it is already a year out of date :+confused:”

I can't see what the date has to do with anything?

They make films about the 1930's, it wasn't made until after 2000.

You could film part 12 months ago and some more tomorrow, what changes?
phil solo
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by Hicky:
“I suppose you call that evidence, come on, there are loads of programs due out all the time but they want them keep secret don't they?”

They really don't, you know. Getting viewers is a lot easier when you tell people what channel and at what time your show is on.

Are you and 'common sense' having some kind of trial separation? Your posts seem to be getting more absurd with every passing day.
Radical Joe
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by B_Jones:
“I don't think the point of her show was ever to capitalize on the BB recognition. She said it was an American network who would have no idea who she was. In fact, being on BB would not be positive for her in the US. Without exception as far as I can remember, BB contestants have zero success in America in the entertainment industry.

I don't know what the status of it is (if any), but American TV has hundreds of cable channels that are built on thinner story lines than a black upper class twentysomething living in a big mansion. Could go over with urban market or young upscale white female viewers. The Real Housewives of Atlanta in the US is the biggest show in the whole Real Housewives franchise and features an almost 100% black cast.

I do hope Gina has a show, but I am not convinced that even if a pilot was made that it will ever come to fruition.

Another point about the Webridge House: It would make sense for her to live in that house if it was an American show, because most Americans would not equate a smallish apartment in London with wealth (even if it cost millions). They need to see the big columns and the large property.”

But, aside from what Gina's claimed (and who would take her word on anything?) where is the evidence that she's got a show in the USA? The house in Weybridge doesn't prove anything. Just because, to your mind, it's not beyond the realms of possibility that a small cable channel could be interested in someone like her, it doesn't follow that, ergo-facto, she has got a show.

You'll notice that I haven't even commented on the story that Hazel's got a show. I wait for hard facts before committing myself to a view, even though a story in the Mirror carries more weight than a tweet from Gina.
phil solo
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by Radical Joe:
“But, aside from what Gina's claimed (and who would take her word on anything?)”

Note to Hicky - this is a rhetorical question, a response is superfluous
Radical Joe
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by phil solo:
“Note to Hicky - this is a rhetorical question, a response is superfluous ”

Damn, Phil, I was trying to reel him in with that one!
Hicky
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by phil solo:
“They really don't, you know. Getting viewers is a lot easier when you tell people what channel and at what time your show is on.

Are you and 'common sense' having some kind of trial separation? Your posts seem to be getting more absurd with every passing day.:+o”

You think they advertise a show months before it's released, never heard of that.
They can't afford to keep adverts going daily for 6 months.
Hicky
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by Radical Joe:
“Damn, Phil, I was trying to reel him in with that one!”

Is fishing / phishing one of your hobbies then?

-------------
By the way, loving Luisa in cbb, she's the only HM with balls.
B_Jones
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by Radical Joe:
“But, aside from what Gina's claimed (and who would take her word on anything?) where is the evidence that she's got a show in the USA? The house in Weybridge doesn't prove anything. Just because, to your mind, it's not beyond the realms of possibility that a small cable channel could be interested in someone like her, it doesn't follow that, ergo-facto, she has got a show.

You'll notice that I haven't even commented on the story that Hazel's got a show. I wait for hard facts before committing myself to a view, even though a story in the Mirror carries more weight than a tweet from Gina.”

I never said there was proof - I was just saying that the Weybridge house made more sense for an American audience who would want to see the large grounds and big columns. The Weybridge house otherwise makes NO sense at all for a 20 something wanna be socialite (unless she has kids...).

Certainly, it might be worth it for an American cable network to throw 70 or 80k down for a pilot. Most of them never see the light of day but the Gina over the top wealthy persona might be interesting. However, you would have to have a larger cast of characters. I can't imagine that Gina's mother, niece or Edwin the rapper would be interesting enough...so that is confusing.
orangeballoon
26-01-2014
[quote=Hicky;71042267]
Originally Posted by cobis:
“I can't see what the date has to do with anything?

what changes?”

Sadly the answer is right in front of you but as you admited you fail to spot them
Reality tv is cheap product placement and location promotion dependent - and 12months on its stale and not worth the company planting its product/service/shop or whatever wasting their time making it available or paying
Next time you watch any reality tv show think why they went to where ever or drank whatever... They have choices so if they use something or went somewhere its cost paid
Hicky
26-01-2014
[quote=orangeballoon;71047520]
Originally Posted by Hicky:
“
Sadly the answer is right in front of you but as you admitted you fail to spot them
Reality tv is cheap product placement and location promotion dependent - and 12months on its stale and not worth the company planting its product/service/shop or whatever wasting their time making it available or paying
Next time you watch any reality tv show think why they went to where ever or drank whatever... They have choices so if they use something or went somewhere its cost paid”

You may be right, but I know programs are made many many months before they go on air.

Even Lord Sugar's program is made long before it's release, in fact it's so long before the stars can't remember what they did.
anne_666
26-01-2014
Originally Posted by Radical Joe:
“But, aside from what Gina's claimed (and who would take her word on anything?) where is the evidence that she's got a show in the USA? The house in Weybridge doesn't prove anything. Just because, to your mind, it's not beyond the realms of possibility that a small cable channel could be interested in someone like her, it doesn't follow that, ergo-facto, she has got a show.

You'll notice that I haven't even commented on the story that Hazel's got a show. I wait for hard facts before committing myself to a view, even though a story in the Mirror carries more weight than a tweet from Gina.”

I agree. Gina has now tweeted about so much fantasy which has never become reality.
Hicky
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“I agree. Gina has now tweeted about so much fantasy which has never become reality.”

No-one believed Gina had a 2014 calendar out, but they were wrong, it's on my wall.

Mind you i think they made more than 1.
phil solo
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by Hicky:
“You think they advertise a show months before it's released, never heard of that.
They can't afford to keep adverts going daily for 6 months.”

No dear, of course not that would tend toward the absurd (as with much that you say and believe) but it is pretty common to make public the information as to which channel a show will eventually end up on. Even someone with such an apparent lack of cognitive abilty and life experience as yourself must be able to work that one out

I can't believe you're allowed on the Internet unsupervised
phil solo
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by Hicky:
“No-one believed Gina had a 2014 calendar out, but they were wrong, it's on my wall.

Mind you i think they made more than 1.”

Who bought the other copy then?

Or do you have 2 and you're keeping one in its plastic bag as a Collectors Item?

Hicky
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by phil solo:
“No dear, of course not that would tend toward the absurd (as with much that you say and believe) but it is pretty common to make public the information as to which channel a show will eventually end up on. Even someone with such an apparent lack of cognitive abilty and life experience as yourself must be able to work that one out

I can't believe you're allowed on the Internet unsupervised :+o”

What benefit would telling anyone which channel a program will come out on 9 months in advance?
The don't anyway.

It shows your not very aware of the risks in a company announcing what it is going to be showing in the future, that would be rather stupid wouldn't it as another company would have time to produce something to oppose it.
Hicky
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by phil solo:
“Who bought the other copy then?

Or do you have 2 and you're keeping one in its plastic bag as a Collectors Item?

:+p”

It's on the wall in Gina's place.
B_Jones
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“I agree. Gina has now tweeted about so much fantasy which has never become reality.”

Gina doesn't lie.

Why would she lie? She has enough money to do whatever she wants. She has fame. She owns a big house. Right?

Why would a network confirm that they are making a TV show. Don't they want the element of surprise? Isn't it best to just air it and have millions of viewers flock to the screen - tweeting and telling their friends about it? Of course, it is.

Besides, Gina doesn't lie. She doesn't have to. Right?
Radical Joe
27-01-2014
Hicky's claim that TV companies don't like to promote their shows in advance makes no sense in itself, but it makes even less sense when we remember that, even if they did want, for whatever reason, to keep it secret, Gina (the supposed star of the show) has already blabbed about it on her twitter account.
Wilkco
27-01-2014
Gina Rio ‏@iamGinaRio 19h
I love my mummy so much she's too cute! She was crying because she misses her mother thats past and misses me because I live so far! Awhh x

Preparing the way for the announcement when she has to move out of the Weybridge house?
GTR Davo
27-01-2014
STOP bumping this piece of ****!!! Gina is history!! TEAMHAZEL!! now be gone!!
HonestLee
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by GTR Davo:
“STOP bumping this piece of ****!!! Gina is history!! TEAMHAZEL!! now be gone!! ”

I know mate!

This thread's like a Coldsore

Hicky's like a pigeon trying to peck at seed through a window

Amusing for 30 seconds but then you realise she hasn't the sense to know any better so you just feel sorry for her and walk on
<<
<
206 of 206
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map