• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
But not in name of the Doctor
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Shoppy
19-09-2013
Originally Posted by Eighth Doctor:
“Has there been any official confirmation that Hurt is the Time War Doctor?”

No there hasn't.

First there was fan speculation based on the photo of Hurt wearing Eccleston's coat.

Following that there was apparent "confirmation" from the costume designer whose description of Hurt's Doctor sounded like it was lifted directly from fan speculation in a forum...

...this was then reported on one sci-fi website and picked up by a tabloid newspaper...

...It was then stated on another sci-fi website as being "officially confirmed" in that newspaper.

So now people are assuming that is a definite because it's what they themselves were speculating to begin with.


Seems to me that fans have just been told what they want to hear - that they guessed right and don't need to guess again.
Great way of keeping things under wraps
allen_who
19-09-2013
the only clue I've weened is a quote from Moffat:-

"I don't even know what the Valeyard is meant to be... If you're going to hint at the Doctor having a dark side you have to mention the Valeyard though so that's why I put it in the script"


So for me

• It's nothing to do with the Valeyard

• the whole thing is some kind of tease.. hinting rather than insisiting
Dogmatix
19-09-2013
How about sending Centurian Rorus Gulielmus out to get Cybermens' attention by blowing up some of their space stations? That's a bit (cyber-) bloodthirsty.
codename_47
20-09-2013
Another hint to the time war was the amount of Daleks in the trailer (from those lucky enough to see it) implying that they were fully back as an entire galaxy threatening power and not just the odd one or two rebuilding the odd fleet or so...

I'm glad Moffat doesn't understand the first thing about the Valeyard (or the watcher for that matter) because it just fries my brain thinking about it!
codename_47
20-09-2013
Originally Posted by Dogmatix:
“How about sending Centurian Rorus Gulielmus out to get Cybermens' attention by blowing up some of their space stations? That's a bit (cyber-) bloodthirsty.”

Yeah, and considering it had no relevance to the rest of the episode (blatently written just so they could put the Cybermen in the trailer like they did with the Dalek later on that year too...)
a bit pointlessly bloodythirsty too....
johnnysaucepn
20-09-2013
Originally Posted by codename_47:
“Yeah, and considering it had no relevance to the rest of the episode (blatently written just so they could put the Cybermen in the trailer like they did with the Dalek later on that year too...)
a bit pointlessly bloodythirsty too....”

It's been well established that the Cybermen are parasites - the only living parts of them are people that have been torn apart and stuffed screaming into a shell. In the past the Doctor has shown pity, but no regret, for freeing them from their tortured existence.
excelents
17-10-2013
I was just chatting with Cleverbot and tried this out

Me : The last great time war.

CB : That senseless war...

Me : Not in the name of the doctor.

CB : Introducing John Hurt.

Trolled lol
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map