Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“Whilst I take your point, and on a wider note the overall PR (the communication of intent and expectation management) has been poor, any trailer or teaser shown widely on the BBC would, in this instance, be marketing, not 50th programme PR (see also below).
PR also applies to the wider viewer base, DW fan or not. It is not the sole preserve of the committed DW fan.
And are the numbers on these fan sites and fan forums anywhere near representative of the 7 or 8 million viewers of DW as a whole?
The simple answer would be a resounding "No". they form but a very relatively small group of fans, and a much smaller group of viewers.”
As per my earlier posts, I personally agree on the trailer as it's primarily a marketing device. I haven't suggested that it should be released, I just have some sympathy with those who are complaining and I think
something more could have been done for the UK fans.
PR can of course apply to a wider base, but it's really down to how it's being used, and what is being sold. A common generalisation about the difference is that Marketing relates to advertising, and public relations relates to the press. So whilst marketing might have produced a general magazine advert used across many publications, PR will arrange exclusive interviews and cover shoots per title. But of course there's huge overlap, more so when there's brand management involved. I have a fair amount of professional experience with PR and marketing people, and I'd swear half of them aren't sure which (or what...) they're doing!
The point about fans, is that if PR techniques are applied successfully they become a message multiplier (apologies, that sound like something I picked up from a powerpoint). They may not be many, but they are vocal and spread the word. A large part of the reason that Doctor Who is now popular in America, is because of the fans. If that's ignored or mismanaged, it can backfire.
However... since I posted on this thread earlier I've realised something. There's little criticism towards Doctor Who, most of it seem to be directed at the BBC and what those concerned were expecting for their license fee (oh, and a minority who blame Moff for everything). I'd say any brand damage from this would be to the BBC itself, not the show.