• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Would you buy Phil Mitchell having other children?
CherryRose
23-09-2013
Phil is no spring chicken and I'd say he has always been a ladies man, I would love it if EE brought in a child or twins that he never knew he had.

They could be the product of a former love who was frightened of his controlling ways but has now passed on and now the child or childrens now adults come to seek their Dad out. Eastenders is missing some older characters in their 20's.
jsmith99
23-09-2013
Adopted, you mean?

I find it totally unbelievable that any woman would willingly sleep with such a loathsome character as PM.
ilovenicnacs
23-09-2013
Phil has destroyed every relationship he ever had, including with his children, why inflict him on any more innocents

Within a month of them arriving they will be either working at the arches and bossing Jay and Dexter around, working in r and r and bossing Sharon and Ronnie about, or working as a "Manager" in the Vic bossing Alfie about.

All will have no experience in the roles whatsoever, but will miraculously acquire the skills just by saying "I'm a Mitchell" 3x.

We have Joey, Lucy, Whitney, Fatboy, poppy, in their 20's this should tell you all you need to know about recruiting more.
CherryRose
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“Adopted, you mean?

I find it totally unbelievable that any woman would willingly sleep with such a loathsome character as PM.”

As in children that were conceived by him that he didn't have a clue about. The ladies love Phil
CherryRose
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by ilovenicnacs:
“Phil has destroyed every relationship he ever had, including with his children, why inflict him on any more innocents

Within a month of them arriving they will be either working at the arches and bossing Jay and Dexter around, working in r and r and bossing Sharon and Ronnie about, or working as a "Manager" in the Vic bossing Alfie about.

All will have no experience in the roles whatsoever, but will miraculously acquire the skills just by saying "I'm a Mitchell" 3x.

We have Joey, Lucy, Whitney, Fatboy, poppy, in their 20's this should tell you all you need to know about recruiting more.”

Phil is over 50 so they could be early 30's
Admiral Star
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by CherryRose:
“As in children that were conceived by him that he didn't have a clue about. The ladies love Phil”

God knows why.

They should bring back Louise.
Admiral Star
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by CherryRose:
“Phil is over 50 so they could be early 30's”

He doesn't need anymore children. Better to rebuild his relationship with Louise and eventually Ben when he finally comes back from prison with a new head.
ilovenicnacs
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by CherryRose:
“Phil is over 50 so they could be early 30's”

Then they would probably be even more mouthy and bring a brood of hideous grandchildren for him to train up in the ways of the Mitchell.
Broken_Arrow
23-09-2013
I'm surprised they haven't done this already. It would make the Mitchells big again and give them the Mitchells Brothers they've been trying to recreate since the late 90's.
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
I thought this said "Would you buy Phil Mitchell's children?"
jsmith99
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by CherryRose:
“.............. The ladies love Phil”

Given a choice between following the script or being sacked .... it must be a tough decision.
Hound of Love
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“Adopted, you mean?

I find it totally unbelievable that any woman would willingly sleep with such a loathsome character as PM.”

Agreed.

But I wouldn't be surprised if there is a long lost retcon child storyline for him in future.:sleep:
puppetangel
23-09-2013
Wouldn't they just bring Louise back instead?


Poor Ben, if he'd been raised by Kathy he'd be so different.
bass55
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by puppetangel:
“Wouldn't they just bring Louise back instead?


Poor Ben, if he'd been raised by Kathy he'd be so different.”

I disagree with this. There was always something wrong about Ben. He showed early signs of psychopathic behaviour shortly after his return in 2006 when he hurt Freddie Mitchell, who was just a baby at the time. Not saying that Phil couldn't have done a better job with him, he could have; but the boy always had issues.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map