• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Results:Will Phil and Tina give in temptation? (One night stand)
Yes - it will obviously happen
27 (58.70%)
No - it will never happen!!
19 (41.30%)
Voters: 46. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
EastEnders - Phil and Tina
<<
<
4 of 7
>>
>
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“He knows his character inside out, so what if dtc came out and said it - wouldnt that be valid? Whos opinion would be valid?

Those poeple made me upset last night for possibly ruining my closure, they knew full well what they were doing.”

The actors have their own feelings on the characters and their own interpretation of the characters feelings when they act out the scripts. It doesn't mean how they feel about it is the 100% factual story being told or will go in the direction they believe.

Adam Woodyatt had completely different ideas about Ian's development post-breakdown but the writer's pretty much slotted him back to where he was before.

Steve McFadden may feel one way about the story and then someone comes in and does something completely different.

Do you see why saying "the actor said this" is completely null and void when it comes to people's own opinions about character motivations?

It doesn't mean that you are "wrong" and it doesn't spoil your "closure" it just means people interpret it differently.
Admiral Star
23-09-2013
He was angry because of her popping pills when she was meant to be looking after Lexi, and the danger it posed for his granddaughter.

Sharon is off the pills now, and she'll work her way into Phil's good books again. Afterall Phil was an addict so I'm sure enough time has passed for him to be sympathetic and see past her mistake.
sarahcadhill
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Admiral Star:
“He was angry because of her popping pills when she was meant to be looking after Lexi, and the danger it posed for his granddaughter.

Sharon is off the pills now, and she'll work her way into Phil's good books again. Afterall Phil was an addict so I'm sure enough time has passed for him to be sympathetic and see past her mistake.”

Completely agree!! Hopefully Phil will realise how badly he treated Sharon as he knows what it's like being an addict.
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by sarahcadhill:
“Even if Shirley was a pill addict and left pills near Lexi, he would have thrown Shirley out and treated her badly. Although Phil had treated Shirley much badly than he ever did to Sharon. Anyway, Sharon and Phil won't get back together.

Shirley should be back in November ”

Shirley encouraged phil to drink and take a drug, she encouraged rainie, she drank a lot round the house and smoked, did he chuck her out over these?

He wanted to marry someone who put a drug in his hand, yeah he didnt love her then
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by IanMandy:
“Yes I have thank you very much! As mentioned many times before, Phil has loved and almost idolised Sharon- his perfect woman- and to see her do something so bad scared him. Made her seem more 'normal' and certainly not on the pedestal that he had her on. But he still spoke to her after”

Yes and hes realized she wasnt the women he thought she was he said as much,

Hes not interested in her now she is off the pills.
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“Shirley encouraged phil to drink and take a drug, she encouraged rainie, she drank a lot round the house and smoked, did he chuck her out over these?”

No, because he was in a drunken/stoned stupor.

If you're a crazed alcoholic and crack addict would you chuck out someone feeding these habits?
sarahcadhill
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“Shirley encouraged phil to drink and take a drug, she encouraged rainie, she drank a lot round the house and smoked, did he chuck her out over these?”

That's different as Sharon could have killed Lexi. Also Phil was in a very vulnerable state.
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by sarahcadhill:
“That's different as Sharon could have killed Lexi.”

I dont care. Drink and drugs are phils worst addiction. He said he didnt want to live with an addict so it was as much for him as it was about lexi.
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“Yes and hes realized she wasnt the women he thought she was he said as much,

Hes not interested in her now she is off the pills.”

No, that was the heat of the moment.

He does know the real her, a pill popper is not the real Sharon.
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“No, because he was in a drunken/stoned stupor.

If you're a crazed alcoholic and crack addict would you chuck out someone feeding these habits?”

Yes you would. If you didnt love them. They could make that addict worse.
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“No, that was the heat of the moment.

He does know the real her, a pill popper is not the real Sharon.”

How was it in the heat of the moment when hes not interested now?
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“I dont care. Drink and drugs are phils worst addiction. He said he didnt want to live with an addict so it was as much for him as it was about lexi.”

But you're referring to when Shirley was feeding his addiction.

If he was off the wagon and off his face on crack he's not going to very well chuck her out for moral reasons is he?
Admiral Star
23-09-2013
How can you be upset at people for viewing their opinion on a storyline? Especially when it agrees with what the majority on here are saying? No one has ruined your closure here. It's you seeing what you want to see from a storyline, and playing it out in your own head.

No one here throws a wobbly because you slag them off on twitter. EE isn't a show only made for yourself Mona. Plenty of us enjoy EE and enjoy discussing storylines. It's is why we're here. Personally I think it's very arrogant to suggest people who disagree with you are only here to upset you. Like you're someone important and warrant annoying.

Sorry to go off on one everyone but it really irritates me when people go funny just because they say what they see in a storyline. I come here to enjoy myself, not to be told I'm an idiot for not agreeing with warped theories on storylines. If you don't like to way storylines are going, and feel let down, blame the writers not those of us who observe things which are happening.
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“Yes you would. If you didnt love them. They could make that addict worse.”

He was a full blown crack addict at that point. He's not going to think as rationally as he was when he was stone cold sober and began repairing his family, fixed his home started building a relationship with his granddaughter, Ben's in prison etc.

The two situations are worlds apart.
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“But you're referring to when Shirley was feeding his addiction.

If he was off the wagon and off his face on crack he's not going to very well chuck her out for moral reasons is he?”

Then why is he not interested in sharon ?

He didnt just get back together with her, he wanted to marry her. You dont marry someone whos put a drug in your hand. How careless is that?
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“He was a full blown crack addict at that point. He's not going to think as rationally as he was when he was stone cold sober and began repairing his family, fixed his home started building a relationship with his granddaughter, Ben's in prison etc.

The two situations are worlds apart.”

He wasnt on drugs when he proposed to shirl / their wedding day?
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“How was it in the heat of the moment when hes not interested now?”

Who said he's not interested now?

He has other things on his mind, they've not interacted for weeks.

I'm not saying they're madly in love with her but him chucking her out is not his overall feeling for Sharon.
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“Who said he's not interested now?

He has other things on his mind, they've not interacted for weeks.

I'm not saying they're madly in love with her but him chucking her out is not his overall feeling for Sharon.”

Tonights spoilers say as much,
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“He wasnt on drugs when he proposed to shirl / their wedding day?”

What does that have to do with it?

We're talking about when he was on crack.
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“Tonights spoilers say as much,”

As much about?
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“ What does that have to do with it?

We're talking about when he was on crack.”

Im not, i was talking about their wedding week when shirl put a drug in phils hand. he was sober then
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“As much about?”

That hes not interested
Admiral Star
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by sarahcadhill:
“That's different as Sharon could have killed Lexi. Also Phil was in a very vulnerable state.”

I think it was more the fact that Sharon put Lexi in danger which was the driving force for him throwing her out.

She wouldn't have tempted him back onto drugs, she was addicted to prescription drugs anway. Not much of a temptation for Phil.
Joe_Zel
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“That hes not interested”

Quote:
“Meanwhile, Sharon and Ronnie continue to clash over the way the R&R is being run. Sharon vents her anger to Phil but he isn't interested and offers to buy Sharon's share of R&R.”

Yes, him not being interested in her daft feud with Ronnie refers to everything else in mona's version of EastEnders.

This is what I mean, it's impossible to have a discussion with you because you have a completely alternate universe of the show created with actor comments, tweets, spoilers, your own interpretation (which is fine), and you've evaluated, digested and took on board things that haven't even arrived onscreen yet to create these bizarre conclusions.

I politely end the conversation here.
monalisa62003
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“Yes, him not being interested in her daft feud with Ronnie refers to everything else in mona's version of EastEnders.

This is what I mean, it's impossible to have a discussion with you because you have a completely alternate universe of the show created with actor comments, tweets, spoilers, your own interpretation (which is fine) to create these bizarre conclusions.

I politely end the conversation here. ”

If he was interested he wouldnt offer to buy her out, would make the whole reason why he gave it to her vold

No sign of them getting back together anytime soon
<<
<
4 of 7
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map