• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Eastenders does anyone else hope the give Sharon the axe?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
missemmerdale22
23-09-2013
She hasnt had any good storylines since her return last year sharon should not of return. And axe that brat of a son.
dancing.queen
23-09-2013
If Sharon leaves it will because Letitia has left of her own accord. They wouldn't axe her.
priscilla
23-09-2013
Yes, I hope they do.
QueenAmy
23-09-2013
As much as her recent stint has been horrendous, it would be disgraceful if an iconic character like Sharon was axed, and I don't think that DTC would axe her either - Sharon's probably the SAFEST
Harlowe
23-09-2013
I reckon she be gone by next year if her storylines don't improve.
Zack06
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by priscilla:
“Yes, I hope they do.”

I agree with you. Letitia's acting just hasn't been up to scratch and the storylines for her have been total rubbish.
priscilla
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Zack06:
“I agree with you. Letitia's acting just hasn't been up to scratch and the storylines for her have been total rubbish.”

Agreed, all she does is open her eyes wide, wobble around and whisper as for sls they have been awful. All the hype about Sharon being a hurricane, a fart could make more of an impact than Sharon.
DUNDEEBOY
23-09-2013
She is quite high on the long list of axings to come I think
bass55
23-09-2013
No, they just need to get their heads out of their arses and deliver some decent material for Sharon. Why exactly did they even bring her back? She's done nothing since her return over a year ago; it's a disgraceful way to treat an original character. Sharon has always been a central character, always at the heart of the action. To see her reduced to silly squabbling over her demon child is tragic.
sarahcadhill
23-09-2013
LOL do people really think Sharon will get axed? Only way for Sharon to leave is if Letitia Dean decides to leave.
The_abbott
23-09-2013
Sharon won't be axed.

Denny on the other hand....
vald
23-09-2013
I don't think they will axe her...shame that.
Mormon Girl
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Sharon won't be axed.

Denny on the other hand....”

No Dennis won't be axed Harry Hickles is really cute in real life http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n40dmyG9J4M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00-Dg9tTeHo
felixrex
23-09-2013
No. I want them to use her well.
IanMandy
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Sharon won't be axed.

Denny on the other hand....”

Dennis will stay because Sharon needs some family- and I think there is a story involving the Wattses anyway
OhWhenTheSaints
23-09-2013
They won't axe her.
Stupid_Head
23-09-2013
I think it would be very funny and definitely kill the myth that so called "legends" only leave when they want to.
priscilla
23-09-2013
Denny is like Simon Barlow 2.0, they are both brats, rude and cry when people tell them off, and both their mothers think their Gods gift and will never accept that their sons are at faults.
Maria95
23-09-2013
I think that no one is bigger than the show and if Sharon doesn't improve then they will axe her. I'm sorry she may have been a big character once upon a time but no one is bigger than the show. Just ask Pat St. Clement, they axed her without a second thought when she just wanted a break and they surely can do the same to Letitia if they feel that there's no way forward for Sharon.
the_lostprophet
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by missemmerdale22:
“sharon should not of return.”

'should not have returned'.

Arrrgh, why do so many people these days say 'should of' and 'could of' instead of 'should have' and 'could have'? It must be 'cause the shortened version of 'should have' is 'should've' and when you say that out loud, it sounds like 'should of' so they spell it that way.
IanMandy
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Stupid_Head:
“I think it would be very funny and definitely kill the myth that so called "legends" only leave when they want to.”

That happened with pat though? She never wanted a permaent break but the producers axed her
SpiderMan 83
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by Zack06:
“I agree with you. Letitia's acting just hasn't been up to scratch and the storylines for her have been total rubbish.”

Problem is there is only so much they could do with Sharon. All her stints seem to be coming back hooking up with some bloke them realising she still likes Phil and hooking up with him etc.

Apart from Steve, June and Adam just don't see her have chemistry with anyone on that show.

Compare that to Sam Womack, who had one scene with Danielle Harold and you'd think those two had be acting together for a while and could really see they are family.
Admiral Star
23-09-2013
At least give her a chance under the new producer before deciding her fate.

Anyway she would never be axed. She'd leave. Can't say I'd blame her after the way she's been treated this past year.
dale0693
23-09-2013
Well it wouldn't stop them if they wanted to they did axe Pat don't forget
Admiral Star
23-09-2013
Originally Posted by IanMandy:
“That happened with pat though? She never wanted a permaent break but the producers axed her”

Actually you have a point, there's always a chance it can happen. Maybe they will be less likely to do it due to all the bad press they received when Pat's axing came out recently.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map