I really liked both Alex and Dan. Strongly disliked Kate and Victor.
That doesn't actually add anything to the discussion does it?
That doesn't actually add anything to the discussion does it?
perfect housemate
4 of 4
Originally Posted by new_rose:
“I am fully aware of the forum T&CS & I have insulted no one.
You were sarcastic to a post I made.”
“I am fully aware of the forum T&CS & I have insulted no one.
You were sarcastic to a post I made.”
Quote:
“Maybe you haven't got a clue what makes good television??”
“Maybe you haven't got a clue what makes good television??”
Insulting my intelligence
Quote:
“Maybe you loved one of the boring BB losers who disappeared after BB finished??
”
“Maybe you loved one of the boring BB losers who disappeared after BB finished??
”
Accusation by implication and therefore insult by association
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“Ah, I see - when you said 'originally talked about', you actually meant 'talked about second'. ... Anyway, darling talked about Kate in response to your post about Kate (and Dan). That's fair enough - that's how discussions work. By contrast, you mentioned Alex (along with Victor and Mel) in a discussion about Kate (and have continued to do so), although he has no relevance to the discussion in hand. Do you see the difference?”
“Ah, I see - when you said 'originally talked about', you actually meant 'talked about second'. ... Anyway, darling talked about Kate in response to your post about Kate (and Dan). That's fair enough - that's how discussions work. By contrast, you mentioned Alex (along with Victor and Mel) in a discussion about Kate (and have continued to do so), although he has no relevance to the discussion in hand. Do you see the difference?”
You must get it right.
I mentioned Kate as one of my favourite housemates, plus Dan - which was the point of the thread.
I said I diagreed with somebody who said Victor was a great housemate - tho I compared Victor to nobody - an important point.
It was darling who first compared housemates.
I only brought Alex into the discussion because an Alex fan had preferred Victor to Kate, even though Victor had been derogatory to Mel during the Panto.
Those are the facts.
Originally Posted by Omah:
“Insulting my intelligence
Accusation by implication and therefore insult by association”
“Insulting my intelligence
Accusation by implication and therefore insult by association”
I think you're exaggerating I point I made. I was not insulting your intelligence or accusing you of anything. My reply was a tongue-in-cheek response to a sarcastic remark you made about a perfectly legitimate post I made.
I need no lesson in forum T&Cs & I apologise if I offended you. It was not my intention, as I'm sure it was not your intention to offend me in any way.
Originally Posted by new_rose:
“I apologise if I offended you. It was not my intention, as I'm sure it was not your intention to offend me in any way.”
“I apologise if I offended you. It was not my intention, as I'm sure it was not your intention to offend me in any way.”
Definitely no offence meant .....
4 of 4
