|
||||||||
So is this the end of the Mitchell's in The Vic? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 345
|
So is this the end of the Mitchell's in The Vic?
.....
Related content from Digital Spy:
- 'EastEnders': Danny Dyer to play new Queen Vic landlord - Danny Dyer joins 'EastEnders': Is he right for the Queen Vic? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,628
|
Quote:
emm OBVIOUSLY!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,362
|
I wish this was April 1st.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 345
|
I mean it says replacing kat and Alfie will Phil still have a connection a share! Will it be a similar situation to Mitchell vs watts fighting over it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: In the red mist
Posts: 19,787
|
Depends, Phil could still have a share in the Vic. Either way the Moons are out of the Vic, thank the lord.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,323
|
Quote:
I mean it says replacing kat and Alfie will Phil still have a connection a share! Will it be a similar situation to Mitchell vs watts fighting over it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,547
|
I'm quite glad, without Peggy the Mitchell's in the Vic are pointless
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Albert Square
Posts: 10,674
|
The Mitchell in the Vic ended in 2010!
Time to let another family run it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,574
|
Roxy will be redundant. When shes not in the vic she hasn't done anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: With My Courtney Mitchell
Posts: 1,085
|
According so soapsquad It says that Bosses are keeping tight lipped into why alfie gives up control of the vic it says nothing about phil
here is the link to it http://www.soapsquawk.co.uk/news/dan...ss.php#results |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Down Saaf
Posts: 10,375
|
Quote:
Depends, Phil could still have a share in the Vic. Either way the Moons are out of the Vic, thank the lord.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13,401
|
Quote:
I think the 'For Sale' teaser suggests that Phil does sell up. We know he's pretty low on cash, the Arches is 'his' asset, the club earns well for doing so little, so the Vic would be the logical asset for him to sell. He's never had the great affinity for the place that Sharon/Den/Peggy had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middleton
Posts: 13,839
|
I'm praying Phil still owns it or at a push some of it, I'll be totally devastated
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: With My Courtney Mitchell
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
I'm praying Phil still owns it or at a push some of it, I'll be totally devastated
![]() here is the link http://www.soapsquawk.co.uk/news/dan...ss.php#results |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
im really interested if phil knows hes selling it to a carter or will he be surprised at who hes sold it to. im wondering does a for sale sign mean theyve already sold it or that its going up for sale?
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
sorry double post
they have this on the bbc website. doesnt this mean phil will sell it? Under New Management yet soapsquark make out alfie gives up his place |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London
Posts: 957
|
Maybe Alfie gives up his post and Phil decides to sell for other reasons...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sunny Doncaster
Posts: 7,883
|
They'll be back in soon enough..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 330
|
You know for sale sign could be lease too. I hope Phill retains ownership, so Peggy can come back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 264
|
Phil would never sell. I'm sure it's the lease. He has a business in his name and a grand a month rent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
Phil would never sell. I'm sure it's the lease. He has a business in his name and a grand a month rent.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Andover
Posts: 16,806
|
I have a feeling Phil only sells the lease to them, he will still be the owner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Andover
Posts: 16,806
|
Quote:
So does under new management could mean the lease?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
I have a feeling Phil only sells the lease to them, he will still be the owner.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,687
|
Quote:
You know for sale sign could be lease too. I hope Phill retains ownership, so Peggy can come back.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:31.



