Originally Posted by FrankBT:
“Hm! Trivial really. Sara Cox reads from given script. If script is wrong then what she reads will be wrong. Hardly her fault then. TBH I don't even remember Tracey Ullman's My Guy thinking at first was that a cover of the famous Mary Wells Motown hit, only on hearing to realise that it was a cover of My Girl by Madness and not as good. I wouldn't have had a clue what year in the 80s it was, neither I suspect would the majority. It's mainly about the music and it was a decent selection tonight.”
Originally Posted by keicar:
“Sorry but if she needs a script written for her she's the wrong person for the show, of course it's about the music and therefore should be factually accurate not near enough, would that do for a history program? Would getting the date of the miners strike wrong be acceptable to the BBC? now was it 1984 or 1988??
She would do her own research if she was really interested in the music she was playing, at least Tony Hadley on Absolute 80's on a Saturday night was 'there'”
Yes the music comes first of course, but other aspects are not trivial. They don't have to read out information about the songs they play, they choose to do so, and if they choose to do so then they should get things right. It's not that difficult. After all, for people that do not know song facts that well it feeds them incorrect facts that might play with their own memory. Someone might think "oh, I thought that was older than that" or "I'm sure I heard that when I was doing such and such, I must be mistaken". It's about being totally professional and not slapdash around the edges. It makes me wonder if Sara Cox is one of those presenters that just turns up, does the job and goes home, leaving every aspect of the research to others and expecting to turn up and have someone hand her some paperwork with someone else's hard work to pass off as her own on the radio. It sounds like it.