|
||||||||
Which 7" tablet? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
|
Which 7" tablet?
Looking at getting a 7" tablet for use out and about, in bed and when travelling. It won't replace my phone or Macs but it'll definitely have its uses. I'm currently torn between the iPad Mini, Nexus 7 or Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0. Which one of those would you guys say is the best?
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,461
|
Go to a store and play with them. They all work, I found the iPAD mini the easiest and most intuitive but you may not agree which is why you need to try them all yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Western Scotland
Posts: 13,586
|
If you have lots of iPhone apps already then think about the mini. If not I definitely think the Nexus, the 1920x1200 screen is far superior, the processor packs a punch and it's cheaper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
I think the Nexus 7 is the best if you are already an Android user. It's the most powerful and has the best screen in this size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 15,714
|
I wouldn't recommend the Mini in its current state as it's using pretty old hardware at this point. If it however gets upgraded to the A7X and Retina display I would recommend it over an Android device due to the higher quality apps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
|
Quote:
Go to a store and play with them. They all work, I found the iPAD mini the easiest and most intuitive but you may not agree which is why you need to try them all yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,793
|
Quote:
That's what I plan to do. Looking at the specs the Nexus 7 sounds the most promising but I really need to try them out first before buying. Trouble with the iPad Mini is that it's basically a smaller version of the iPad 2 and it's more expensive than the Nexus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
Quote:
That's what I plan to do. Looking at the specs the Nexus 7 sounds the most promising but I really need to try them out first before buying. Trouble with the iPad Mini is that it's basically a smaller version of the iPad 2 and it's more expensive than the Nexus.
Plus the Nexus 7 does have the quad-core processor, highest resolution screen at that size, and is guaranteed updates instantly direct from Google. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,285
|
The Tesco Hudl must be worth considering I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 15,714
|
Quote:
One thing I prefer about iPads though is the 4:3 screen ratio, I'm not a massive fan of the 16:9 Android screen, but it's all down to personal choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,098
|
It's got to be the Nexus. And I say that as a Mac and iPhone user. I couldn't justify the cost of an iPad Mini so got myself a Nexus 7 and I love it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
|
Quote:
The Tesco Hudl must be worth considering I think.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Yorks
Posts: 6,180
|
Quote:
I'm a bit sceptical about that one. When it comes to electronics I prefer to go for a known brand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,793
|
Quote:
Yeah I have an N7 and an iPad and I have to agree. It's odd as on the phone I prefer the 16:9 ratio as per my N4 although I think at iPhone size 4:3 works better as it's too skinny.
Even using an Android tablet as an ebook reader I find the screen a bit to narrow compared to a Kindle ereader or iPad. Sure if you want to watch a film then the 16:9 radio is great but I bet people web browse more than watch films and I've never really found the 16:9 format works for web pages. I still prefer the 4:3 laptop screen but that is very rare these days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
|
Quote:
Tesco are a huge known brand
![]() ![]() Quote:
I still prefer the 4:3 laptop screen but that is very rare these days.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Yorks
Posts: 6,180
|
Quote:
I know, but my dad probably wouldn't allow me to buy it as he hates Tesco. He doesn't even like buying food from there and the horsemeat scandal didn't change his opinion
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
I'm a bit sceptical about that one. When it comes to electronics I prefer to go for a known brand.
Another option if you're on a tight budget - Nook HD. Pretty good spec, and well under £100. Kindle Fire HD - also quite good, especially the latest versions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wapping, London
Posts: 16,222
|
Quote:
A phone is generally designed to be used in the portait mode, perhaps except for watching a film. A tablet tends to be used in the landscape mode and I think the 4:3 screen ratio just makes that better.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,793
|
Quote:
I know, but my dad probably wouldn't allow me to buy it as he hates Tesco. He doesn't even like buying food from there and the horsemeat scandal didn't change his opinion
![]() I haven't seen 4:3 laptop screens since the Windows XP era. They all went widescreen during the Vista era IIRC. As for Macs, they went widescreen when Apple changed to Intel processors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,285
|
Quote:
I'm a bit sceptical about that one. When it comes to electronics I prefer to go for a known brand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds. UK
Posts: 10,379
|
Quote:
Trouble with the iPad Mini is that it's basically a smaller version of the iPad 2 and it's more expensive than the Nexus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
|
Quote:
I thought you was at Uni? If your dad won't let you buy it does that mean you are at primary school and I am mistaken?
![]() Quote:
You do realise that Apple are likely to announce a new iPad Mini on October 15th?
Will it offer more than the current one?
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The ♥ of rural England
Posts: 3,555
|
Depends on what you need and wish to pay for a Tablet. I've had a 7inch @Tab, dual core for six months or more without any problem.
I has all the connectivity e.g. HDMI, front and rear cameras, all Android features and I got it for £89.99. I can't really fault it. It's not an iPad by any means, but not the same price either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds. UK
Posts: 10,379
|
Quote:
I didn't know actually
Will it offer more than the current one? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
..Sure if you want to watch a film then the 16:9 radio is great..
4:3 is a throwback to low resolution screens. VGA was 640x 480 4:3 and when computers took off SVGA 800x600 was prevalent until we got xga 1024x768 4:3. Everything 4:3 pretty much stopped there and we moved to widescreen usually keeping that same 768 height until 1080p arrived. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:29.




