I've recently been giving some thought on the various monsters that have appeared in Doctor Who, and I've begun to wonder what exactly are the keys to making a monster successful.
Creatures like the Daleks and Weeping Angels were only supposed to be one-shot monsters, but exploded into popularity. Despite having only one televised appearance early in the Fourth Doctor era, the Zygons are one of the most talked about Classic Monsters.
On the other hand attempts at creating something with the intention of being popular have fallen flat, such as the Voord, who no one seems to remember, and the Slitheen, who have never been taken mocked by the fandom.
Why do some monsters end up being immortal symbols of the show, while others fade away into obscurity?
What makes a good monster good, and makes a bad one bad?
Creatures like the Daleks and Weeping Angels were only supposed to be one-shot monsters, but exploded into popularity. Despite having only one televised appearance early in the Fourth Doctor era, the Zygons are one of the most talked about Classic Monsters.
On the other hand attempts at creating something with the intention of being popular have fallen flat, such as the Voord, who no one seems to remember, and the Slitheen, who have never been taken mocked by the fandom.
Why do some monsters end up being immortal symbols of the show, while others fade away into obscurity?
What makes a good monster good, and makes a bad one bad?