Aliona speaks out...

6 of 6

Force Ten

24-10-2013

Originally Posted by teeswolf:
“Neither Aliona or Katya should have been let go IMO.

I'm happy Aliona came back and we get to see her in pro dances, the one with Aljaz was fantastic.

She and Tony seem to get on really well, which is great.

A lot can happen over the next 12 months, so I wouldn't automatically assume she won't be back. I believe she's already involved in Children in Need this year.”

I suspect the only reason she's involved in SCD Children in Need is because Natalie Lowe's foot still isn't quite healed.

teeswolf

24-10-2013

Originally Posted by Force Ten:
“I suspect the only reason she's involved in SCD Children in Need is because Natalie Lowe's foot still isn't quite healed.”

I think it's been pointed out a couple of times here that Aliona is here for the series regardless of when Natalie's foot has healed.

sey77

24-10-2013

Originally Posted by JVS:
“No doubt her detractors will think of a lot of reasons why she's wrong, but I think Aliona is 100% correct. Her card was marked when Len heard her say (on ITT, during his break from DWTS) that she takes no notice of the judges' comments.

They partnered Aliona with Johnny Ball last year as a pre-emptive ploy to remove her from the show - her success with Matt Baker and Harry Judd preventing an unseemly earlier exit. Reluctantly recalled this year, they promptly did a reshuffle to get her paired with no-hoper Tony Jacklin.

Brendan, Anton and James Jordan can be controversial, but woe betide any of the others that rock the boat.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/s...vilani-2366315”

Len really didn't like it when she answered him back either...

Illuvatar

25-10-2013

Maybe no-one would answer back to Len if he had something interesting to say.

And what is he? The Benito Mussolini of the dance world? If Aliona disagrees with him, what's the big issue?

6 of 6