|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 3 (1)) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2751 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 5,408
|
Quote:
They've done it wrongly. They've named two of them "ratings thread" and this one "ratings thread (part 3)" each 1 should be part something.
IMO they should have left it open till new years and just have a new 1 each year. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2752 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,788
|
Quote:
IMO they should have left it open till new years and just have a new 1 each year.
But I think they're splitting it every 400 pages. There have been about 700 pages so far this year, so it would have been split anyways using their "400-page" policy. |
|
|
|
|
#2753 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
I seriously hope then if they split threads like this one, then they are splitting things like this >> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=433069
|
|
|
|
|
#2754 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
Yeh, a new thread a year would have been good.
But I think they're splitting it every 400 pages. There have been about 700 pages so far this year, so it would have been split anyways using their "400-page" policy. |
|
|
|
|
#2755 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,130
|
Quote:
I suppose. Perhaps we should try to keep discussion of soap ratings and reality ratings in their respective threads to lessen the number of pages used per year?
|
|
|
|
|
#2756 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I suppose. Perhaps we should try to keep discussion of soap ratings and reality ratings in their respective threads to lessen the number of pages used per year?
|
|
|
#2757 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,788
|
Quote:
I suppose. Perhaps we should try to keep discussion of soap ratings and reality ratings in their respective threads to lessen the number of pages used per year?
|
|
|
|
|
#2758 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37,641
|
Quote:
I suppose. Perhaps we should try to keep discussion of soap ratings and reality ratings in their respective threads to lessen the number of pages used per year?
|
|
|
|
|
#2759 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,352
|
Any news on last night's ratings yet?
I'm particularly interested to see if the IT Crowd did well for C4 last night. |
|
|
|
|
#2760 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 15,333
|
Quote:
They've done it wrongly. They've named two of them "ratings thread" and this one "ratings thread (part 3)" each 1 should be part something.
IMO they should have left it open till new years and just have a new 1 each year. But then who the hell am I to suggest that, I hardly post here, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
#2761 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
The second one is called Part 2. (http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...d.php?t=937319)
|
|
|
|
|
#2762 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
Why? This is a ratings thread - if we're going to start excluding certain shows to discuss we might as well not bother.
|
|
|
|
|
#2763 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,788
|
Quote:
Well why have a seperate soap ratings thread in the first place then?
|
|
|
|
|
#2764 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37,641
|
Quote:
Well why have a seperate soap ratings thread in the first place then?
Honestly. As Sam said it's no big deal - it's just a ratings thread on an internet forum. Get over it. |
|
|
|
|
#2765 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Henley-on-Thames
Posts: 7,630
|
Err whats with the (Part Three)?
|
|
|
|
|
#2766 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
Err whats with the (Part Three)?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2767 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
Because it's in the soaps forum. I don't see your point. Are we not allowed to discuss them here now because there's a thread for them in the soaps forum?
Honestly. As Sam said it's no big deal - it's just a ratings thread on an internet forum. Get over it. I'm just saying I'm not too keen on the splitting up of the thread as it means people like RZT will have to rely on barb's site and searching for the other threads to find old ratings when doing comparisons rather than just going back through the thread and because the ratings thread started at the beginning of 07 so it made sense to replace at the beginning of 08 and have a yearly archive. I'm not saying we shouldn't discuss soap ratings in here, but perhaps we shouldn't go into them in much depth here (just noting if they're up or down and why we think that is) and save the rest for the soap ratings thread. That's all. To take the strain off so D.S. don't split them as much. |
|
|
|
|
#2768 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Does anyone else get confused between Digital Sid and D.M.N?
LOL.It's a real problem for me. Your posts are so similar and you have similar usernames (well, in that they both begin with 'D' but I can't hold that against you). Oh well. Shame about the thread being split up but I imagine DS wouldn't do this if they didn't have to. I believe the technical reason for this is; the bigger the thread is, the more strain it puts on the servers every time someone views it, and with this being such a popular thread it was unsurprisingly a prime target during this forum tidy up. |
|
|
|
|
#2769 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Henley-on-Thames
Posts: 7,630
|
Didnt Hollyoks: Is John Paul Gay have thousands of pages though?
|
|
|
|
|
#2770 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
Does anyone else get confused between Digital Sid and D.M.N?
LOL.It's a real problem for me. Your posts are so similar and you have similar usernames (well, in that they both begin with 'D' but I can't hold that against you). Oh well. Shame about the thread being split up but I imagine DS wouldn't do this if they didn't have to. I believe the technical reason for this is; the bigger the thread is, the more strain it puts on the servers every time someone views it, and with this being such a popular thread it was unsurprisingly a prime target during this forum tidy up. .I do sometimes see posts by Sid_1979 or whatever he's called and think "I don't remember posting that" though, before realising it's a different Sid. |
|
|
|
|
#2771 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
Didnt Hollyoks: Is John Paul Gay have thousands of pages though?
|
|
|
|
|
#2772 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
Didnt Hollyoks: Is John Paul Gay have thousands of pages though?
Miraculously one of my old haunts The Sunset Beach Thread has SURVIVED so far, and yet it has over 100,000 posts.
|
|
|
|
|
#2773 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Leeds
Posts: 15,333
|
Quote:
That one has been split up into several parts as well.
Miraculously one of my old haunts The Sunset Beach Thread has SURVIVED so far, and yet it has over 100,000 posts. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#2774 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 50,506
|
Quote:
Shameless plugging.
![]() ![]() To balance it out I'm a total news junkie, I love QI and BBC FOUR is the best thing since, well, BBC TWO. That's better. My reputation is restored somewhat.
|
|
|
|
|
#2775 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 29,512
|
Quote:
Does anyone else get confused between Digital Sid and D.M.N?
LOL.It's a real problem for me. Your posts are so similar and you have similar usernames (well, in that they both begin with 'D' but I can't hold that against you). Oh well. ![]() You're username begins with "D" as well. Can't see how you can be confused when there are like 10 "r"'s to contend with. ![]() The split means I can't really have a good idea of who stalks this thread. Oh well, for Part 3 since beginning of October:Code:
GeorgeS 171 cylon6 169 D.M.N. 160 Thebenster 155 rzt 148 ZoeMcCallister 115 Score 112 RobbieSykes123 112 Dancc 110 C14E 102 Pizzatheaction 88 Jonwo 85 Agent F 71 Digital Sid 69 A Cillay 66 Fudd 66 Cent 65 AGNUS_BROWN 64 sn_22 50 |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31.




Oh well, for Part 3 since beginning of October: