Originally Posted by Hester_52:
“I’d like Louisa to let Martin be who he is. She defends him to other people, notably his mother, and she has told him that he’s extraordinary and different, but when it comes down to it, she doesn’t really walk that walk.
For them to survive as a couple and a family, he has to make changes in his behavior, of course. But it seems to me she extends reasonable expectations about what’s necessary in their relationship to less reasonable expectations that he change his essential self to conform to her vision of “normal” behavior. She wants him to be more personable, friendlier to the villagers, more sociable, because…because that’s how most people are and it’s the social norm. But those things aren’t important to Martin and run counter to his own sense of what’s meaningful. His values are his values, and his behavior reflects them. She can judge them, if she wants, but it’s not her business to dictate them.
I'm having a little difficulty formulating my thoughts here coherently. I don’t want to sound as if I’m bashing Louisa; as we know, M. is a Difficult Person, and she does love him. But I think she’ll get a lot farther if she responds to who he actually is rather than what she wants him to be.”
I also find it hard to phrase my thoughts, or perhaps even think, coherently about Louisa.
We can think, I guess, that Louisa's behavior varies arbitrarily, according to the whims of the writers and/or the dictates of the plot. I tend to think, that while there's some of that going on, that people, including Louisa, can hold contradictory thoughts or opinions simultaneously, perhaps without even realizing it. So I think it's possible that Louisa intends on some level to accept Martin as he is, but she can't quite admit to herself that the opinion of others about Martin matters to her, and that she doesn't like it when his behavior is off-putting or odd. and she'd like him to be less of a square peg in a round hole at least sometimes.
Where I think she may not be being honest with herself is in overestimating how much she can tolerate of his limited capacity for intimacy and demonstrative affection. Every once in a while, the dam bursts and he blurts out something "nice" and she allows herself to think that he's changed, or that she can live off of these occasional outbursts. But she can't really, and I think the push and pull of that explains some of her erratic behavior. Sometimes she really sees, or thinks she sees that he can't give her what she needs, and then she leaves, but she really wants him so much that she allows herself to believe that what he can occasionally give her is enough.
That, really, is what I think the problem or the drama of S7 will be -- this time, words won't be enough, and he will have to demonstrate over a period of time that he is capable of giving her what she needs from him. Or course, she has to be clear about what that is, in a way that she has never been capable of, so far.
This gets to the question of how legitimate it is to ask someone to change for you, or should you just accept them as they are. First of all, I think people can change their behavior, with prompting and reinforcement. Maybe not who they"are" but some behaviors. And second, I think it is entirely legitimate to state clearly what you need from that person, and what's a deal-breaker if it's not present. Then, stay or go, depending on what happens, accepting that the person has done what they're capable of in the circumstances. But stop wafflling.
And that goes for both of them.