Originally Posted by NewPark:
“cc.cookie says:
"I can't really see that LG did much wrong."
I think Louisa did contribute substantially to the growing problem between them.
She did see his growing isolation, unhappiness, shutting down, pushing her away, as indicating dis-satisfaction with her and their marriage, and perhaps as no longer loving or wanting to be with her. She took it personally, in other words, and I suppose we are meant to think, due to her own insecurities. And perhaps she feels a little guilty that he gave up so much for her and now is so unhappy.,
I think this is why we see so little affection between them -- if he has stopped making any kind of affectionate gesture, it makes somewhat more plausible this belief on her part. Also, perhaps why they ramped up her general level of aggressiveness (although I think the extent of that has been exaggerated).
In a larger sense, perhaps, she was right -- the whole package was just too much for him to handle. But it was not ABOUT her -- it was about him, and his unresolved pathologies resurfacing.
I think Mofromco's question is the right one: what would have happened if she had stood her ground, and pressed on to ask the next question(s)? Like, "what's going on with you? I'm your wife, and I love you and I need to know what's happening with you." Him: "I don't know." Her: "That's not an answer, Martin. How are we going to figure this out, because it's making me unhappy also. We need to work together to figure this out."
Alternatively, she could have gone to Aunt Ruth, and asked for advice. Ruth might have given it to her.
But she gave up on him and their relationship too easily, as she has always done, and could not or would not find the time and space to ask the right questions and press for answers. And then, after the crisis, when he was clearly shaken, as she was, she decided that the solution was for her to go off alone and think about things, rather than using this opportunity/crisis to get things out in the open and see if there might be a solution.
so, bottom line: she knew he was flawed, damaged, had a lot of difficulty in personal relationships, but if she had also been able to believe that he really did love her, she might not have been so self-involved. She might have been able to rise above her feelings that SHE was making him unhappy, and press harder to get at what the problem was. And if she truly believed, as she has said many times, that people CAN change if they want to, then she could have told him directly that she expected/needed him to stop shutting down and shutting her out when he was in distress. He might or might not have done that, but at least she would have tried.
His first response might have been, "Who needs happiness?" as it was in the hospital, but, in a less fraught conversation, the answer might have been, "we do -- you do and I do. Now what are we going to do about it? because if the answer is nothing, I'll have to think about whether I can stay in a marriage where you are not concerned about whether we're happy together." My problem with Louisa is that she gave him no real chance to address their problems, but instead, bailed on him. I do hope that changes in S7.
So many ways this could have gone that would have been healthier and more productive. They showed us the least productive path and most dysfunctional path.
and yes, Doc Martin is apparently my crack.”
New Park,
You are quite right.
When I wrote that LG hadn't done that much wrong (and no you didn't take it out of context at all) I was thinking of the sports day and how she had asked DM over and over if he wanted to do the speech and be there for her. She offered to replace him. I don't think she could have made it clearer to him but it was silly of her to ask him in the first place.
As to the whole series yes you are quite right. They never have them sitting down and having a discussion. When you are looking at what makes good fiction one of the things about the conflict involved is that it should never be able to be solved by a simple discussion. Nor should the conflict arise from a simple misunderstanding that could easily be resolved. It is considered sloppy writing.
I think the reason DM gets away with it (mostly) is that it wouldn't be a simple discussion. DM is as thick as two bricks when it comes to emotional depth - "they would cope if you died" and "why do people need to be happy" - and until LG hits him over the head more than a few times with how important it is to her he isn't going to change. Also LG's insecurities have exacerbated the process as you have so clearly pointed out.
I didn't like LG's character in s5 and s6. She seems to be used as a plot driven swinging pendulum to cause DM grief or act like a shrew. I think they need to address some of her issues in s7 and get DM to actually change.
I liked LG in e1, though.
What DM needs to say to LG is "Stop running away."
LG can see it in others - Can berate DM for walking away when she's yelling at him at the sports carnival - but she can't see it in herself. She will only admit that she "doesn't know what she's doing." When she can identify that she's running maybe something will change for her.