The way they play the head to head sometimes makes me laugh.
"Which Australian pop star co-hosted the 2009 Brit Awards?"
Player 1: "I'm not very sure,so I'll pass it."
Well,how sure do you have to be? How many famous Australian pop stars are there? Famous enough to have co-hosted the Brit Awards? I'd say it's a pretty short list. I'd say that list's only got one name on it: Kylie Minogue. Who else could it be? Jason Donovan? So if you pass it,the other guy's probably going to say Kylie. And it's probably going to be right.
Player 2 : "I'll say Kylie Minogue."
Unsurprisingly,Kylie was correct.
This sort of mistake happens quite often. If you think there's, say, a 70% chance you're right,why pass the question? All you're doing is passing the 70% chance that you're right to your opponent,if it's likely he'll say the same as you.
The bloke today twice asked for two point questions even when the jackpot counter had hardly moved. I cannot think of any circumstances when a one or a two point question is a good idea. You just can't afford not to go for three,when you think how many land nowhere near the jackpot counter and end up being no help.
I know next to nothing about Food & Drink,it's my weakest subject, but I'd still go for a three point question. There's a chance I might know it, and even if I don't I've got a 1 in 3 chance of guessing it.