|
||||||||
The Casualty Thread (Spoilers) (Part 5) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
Yes I can understand he was concerned about her welfare but that is invading her privacy. I see about you liking them only as couples. Can I ask you this, do you like Phil Mitchell? He treated Shirley a lot worsen than Fletch did to Tess haha
cant really compare them at all
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ashington
Posts: 2,870
|
Quote:
No excuse. At all.
If I was working in NHS IT - and I used my admin rights to pull data on a relative or friend - I would be summarily sacked. |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,362
|
Quote:
You know how much i hate him i dont know why you even need to ask
cant really compare them at all |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
I thought you hated the way he treated Shirley but I didn't realise you hated Phil as a character lol
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 23,352
|
Quote:
For someone who is close and worried for the person they care for/love anyone would understand they were just concerned.
As the Data Subject, Tess has final say over how her data is processed. Her consultant could pull her records and process them while she had the termination, medical secs could process her static data to send the letter... someone in IT has access to back them up (but only at a DB level), a DBA could repair the record (if auth'd by a change request). Fletch could not even get her data by means of a Data Subject Access Request - as there is no Letter Of Authority (as far as we know) from Tess authorising him access.. I don't know what you do as a job - but if you use IT in any shape or form, you would typically have an annual refresher on the principles of the Data Protection Act. Of course - under the Health records Act - Jeremy Hunt is the ultimate current data owner... |
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
Again - COMPLETELY VERBOTEN.
As the Data Subject, Tess has final say over how her data is processed. Her consultant could pull her records and process them while she had the termination, medical secs could process her static data to send the letter... someone in IT has access to back them up (but only at a DB level), a DBA could repair the record (if auth'd by a change request). Fletch could not even get her data by means of a Data Subject Access Request - as there is no Letter Of Authority (as far as we know) from Tess authorising him access.. I don't know what you do as a job - but if you use IT in any shape or form, you would typically have an annual refresher on the principles of the Data Protection Act. Of course - under the Health records Act - Jeremy Hunt is the ultimate current data owner... So if you have a partner in the business and is concerned theyre not allowed to check just to be sure?? What if fletch was married to tess? |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ashington
Posts: 2,870
|
Quote:
I dont have a job lol but ive had work placements in IT but none to that level.
So if you have a partner in the business and is concerned theyre not allowed to check just to be sure?? What if fletch was married to tess? That's what confidentiality agreements are signed for. The NHS takes these things very seriously. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ashington
Posts: 2,870
|
They don't even allow memory sticks to be used in the Trust I work in now, and everything is heavily encrypted.
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
Still not allowed.
That's what confidentiality agreements are signed for. The NHS takes these things very seriously. |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ashington
Posts: 2,870
|
Quote:
What about if tess was a patient ? Like with chantelle in holby? Are they allowed to check then?
It's a completely different kettle of fish. |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
Yes but they have to access them then, they have no choice if they have to find something out.
It's a completely different kettle of fish. |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 23,352
|
Quote:
Its not really. Tess wasnt working when fletch brought her in. He brought her in as a patient. Charlie even said she shouldnt be working
He looked at a patient episode while she was under Gynae care... nowt to do with him. Breach of Section 55... when the next security audit is done (likely within 12 months) - he's out the door, P45 sent onward. |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
Still no justification as it wasn't that patient episode.
Breach of Section 55... when the next security audit is done (likely within 12 months) - he's out the door, P45 sent onward. |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 23,352
|
Quote:
They don't even allow memory sticks to be used in the Trust I work in now, and everything is heavily encrypted.
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ashington
Posts: 2,870
|
Quote:
But what if tess was a patient and she wasnt working. Charlie told her she shouldnt be working so he clearly saw she was unwell and should be there as a patient. Fletch was doing his job as a nurse and a caring friend (or whatever they are )
If he'd looked at her bloods if she'd had tests done when she was brought in, that would be justified. |
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 23,352
|
Quote:
But what if tess was a patient and she wasnt working. Charlie told her she shouldnt be working so he clearly saw she was unwell and should be there as a patient. Fletch was doing his job as a nurse and a caring friend (or whatever they are )
NHS IT is HEAVILY audited... |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
^ cos tess signed herself off. As i said they didnt think she should be working
Just a side note, zoe done the test for her so she was treating tess as a patient. Fletch just done the same thing zoe done, just without her permission. |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 23,352
|
Quote:
^ cos tess signed herself off. As i said they didnt think she should be working
Just a side note, zoe done the test for her so she was treating tess as a patient. Fletch just done the same thing zoe done, just without her permission. |
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
... and committed Gross Misconduct in the act. Unlawful access under the Data Protection Act is a CRIMINAL OFFENCE.
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
I think you are just seeing it from a view you want to see it from with Tess as an innocent victim and Fletch as the big bad philanderer, when maybe if Tess hadallowed herself to have been more open and honest Fletch would have been with her now as opposed to retreatingand using self preservation when she finished it. If Fletch was the big bad wolf only out for himself he would never have covered up her mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 23,352
|
Quote:
If that was the case tess wouldve done something and fletch wouldnt own up.
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ashington
Posts: 2,870
|
Quote:
They took that long to bung Safeguard on everything and zap USB access? We did that yonks ago at work.. just after the HMRC CD debacle IIRC... took all the CD drives off user depts as well. Every move of data off-network requires sevberal levels of signoff now...
I was actually quite shocked she'd knew of which websites I'd been on too (nothing sinister). |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
Let's just take it for what it is.. Two people who love each other and concerned for each other's well being, in a complicated and complex relationship...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
|
Quote:
Yes yes yes! Agree!!
i wish people would use bold more to specific bits |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 23,352
|
Quote:
Let's just take it for what it is.. Two people who love each other and concerned for each other's well being, in a complicated and complex relationship...
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:26.



cant really compare them at all

