• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Victor finally picks up an award
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
ShowbizGosQueen
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“i fear i may be next ”



Hope not
anna123
05-02-2005
yikes i havent read this thread properly and what dany has said but im suprised hes been banned!

As for vic he did make me laugh in bb! He always tried to act this big tough gansta.. when he so wasnt! i liked his boyz to men imitation too!
He wasnt the only housemate i found funny tho
presshardy
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by anna123:
“yikes i havent read this thread properly and what dany has said but im suprised hes been banned!

As for vic he did make me laugh in bb! He always tried to act this big tough gansta.. when he so wasnt! i liked his boyz to men imitation too!
He wasnt the only housemate i found funny tho”

im surprised she was banned too.
possibly not for ever.
presshardy
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by ShowbizGosQueen:
“

Hope not ”


well im off to the shops now.....deep breath......i may never return
ShowbizGosQueen
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“well im off to the shops now.....deep breath......i may never return ”

Goodbye

(maybe forever)

turnip
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“well im off to the shops now.....deep breath......i may never return ”

it would be a terrible blow to get banned from DS but is suicide really the answer ?
turnip
05-02-2005
bring back Dany ok she would win an outstanding achievment award at a pedantics convention, she was as subtle as a pneumatic drill ....... ermmmmmmmm ......

The Dany Way

bring back Dany
presshardy
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by turnip:
“bring back Dany ok she would win an outstanding achievment award at a pedantics convention, she was as subtle as a pneumatic drill ....... ermmmmmmmm ......

The Dany Way

bring back Dany ”


please ....dont!
turnip
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“please ....dont!”

I thought you were holding an olive branch ?
presshardy
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by turnip:
“I thought you were holding an olive branch ? ”

well i was!! we needed to co-exist and i was all for that.
i didnt like reading her posts. now shes gone and we dont need to co-exist....for now (i dont think she will be banned for ever anyway.) oooh i just noticed her green light is on ...eerie
turnip
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“well i was!! we needed to co-exist and i was all for that.
i didnt like reading her posts. now shes gone and we dont need to co-exist....for now (i dont think she will be banned for ever anyway.) oooh i just noticed her green light is on ...eerie”

yeah I think she will be sin-binned :sleep: She single-handedly ruined the Shell thread Im surprised she got the chop now since she seems to have drifted in towards the rules of co-existence

I have a dream :sleep: someday you and Dany will hold hands running down a flowery hill shouting wheeeeeeee

also shopping can be very therapeuptic :sleep:
presshardy
05-02-2005
Originally Posted by turnip:
“
I have a dream :sleep: someday you and Dany will hold hands running down a flowery hill shouting wheeeeeeee
”

knowing her she would claim that the hill wasnt real. that i wasnt the real presshardy and that this is all just a publicity stunt

ps im going to suggest we dont talk about her anymore and the reasons are 2 fold
1 the mods will be on to us
2 she isnt worth the effort
Iknowicould
06-02-2005
I am not pleased to be referred to as impotent.

Likewise, I am sure, Victor, the father of a little boy.

All she had to do was apologise.
Last edited by Iknowicould : 06-02-2005 at 01:41
Iknowicould
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by Iknowicould:
“I am trying to understand your post.

How could asking you what you meant, whether you meant IMPORTANT instead of IMPOTENT be seen as making a joke of your spelling?”

She never answers the relevant questions when cornered. I waited all night and went to sleep as i knew she would never answer the direct question.

Always tries to hide behind her dyslexia as if she is the only FM with the difficulty.

Always quick to abuse, even when none was directed at her. And to think I have always supported her!
flossie2005
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by Iknowicould:
“Always quite to abuse, even when none was directed at her. And to think I had always supported her!”

Now, IKIC, What DOES this mean?????

Deerd
06-02-2005
I'm a tad bemused (thread-wise) as to what may/may not have happened to warrant Dany a ban - temporary or otherwise - it's possible SOMETHING has gone on behind the scene DS:-ily (PMs/comms with admin/etc).

I'd hope to see such an ethusiastic BB-er back, irregardless of oft times disagreeing with or shaking head at confuzzled-ness of her posts.

i'd kinda like to think that even a dedicated opposition may find a lacking somewhere too.

Dany called it like she saw it, even if her vision seemed confused and limited, on occassion...fair play.

/OT: ummmmmmmm, my original post in this thread, i think
Iknowicould
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by flossie2005:
“Now, IKIC, What DOES this mean?????

”

Don't ask me. I don't know myself.

Must be the keyboard playing tricks.

Or my eyes.

Corrected-
presshardy
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by Deerd:
“I'm a tad bemused (thread-wise) as to what may/may not have happened to warrant Dany a ban - temporary or otherwise - it's possible SOMETHING has gone on behind the scene DS:-ily (PMs/comms with admin/etc).
”

very probably. i was surprised myself....but im not complaining.do temporary bans happen often?
Iknowicould
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by Deerd:
“I'm a tad bemused (thread-wise) as to what may/may not have happened to warrant Dany a ban - temporary or otherwise - it's possible SOMETHING has gone on behind the scene DS:-ily (PMs/comms with admin/etc).

I'd hope to see such an ethusiastic BB-er back, irregardless of oft times disagreeing with or shaking head at confuzzled-ness of her posts.

i'd kinda like to think that even a dedicated opposition may find a lacking somewhere too.

Dany called it like she saw it, even if her vision seemed confused and limited, on occassion...fair play.

/OT: ummmmmmmm, my original post in this thread, i think ”

Enthusiasm is one thing by itself.

Driving other FMs bonkers with unfathomable and circumlocutory posts is something else!

I never wish to read anymore posts about fake Marco or fake Shell or fake moderators or fake Beth or fake phone numbers!
Iknowicould
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“very probably. i was surprised myself....but im not complaining.do temporary bans happen often?”

I believe that is the new regime.

Although I never wish to test that theory!

In my case, it may well be permanent!
presshardy
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by Iknowicould:
“I believe that is the new regime.

Although I never wish to test that theory!

In my case, it may well be permanent!”

welli thought if anyone would go it would be me after the admin edit on the disabled housemates thread....im still half expecting to be booted!
Deerd
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“very probably. i was surprised myself....but im not complaining.do temporary bans happen often?”

I've seen temporary bans happen, not that often; sometimes it seems (from the outside looking in) as though a FMs' response to a ban and how they interact with 'admin' during that process can determine how long/the extent to which they become persona non grata.

/disclaimer: simply my take based on times gone by.

**shrugs**

while i recognized some of Dany's posts were immflamatory and divisive i saw nothing which appeared to warrant a ban - don't know how many/who may have pressed alert; otherwise it may well be a behind the scenes issue which is as well kept off the boards. it could be something non-DS:BB related and resultant from another fora within the DS sphere.

Dunno
Iknowicould
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“welli thought if anyone would go it would be me after the admin edit on the disabled housemates thread....im still half expecting to be booted!”

You need to be extra careful then. You do post close to the edge sometimes.

I am sure that if you adjust the tone of your posts down a little bit and avoid long discussions with some stubborn FMs, the likelyhood of further sanctions might diminish.

I believe the mods realise that we all make mistakes and a warning or two might be enough to avoid repeating the same incident to trigger a ban.
presshardy
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by Iknowicould:
“You need to be extra careful then. You do post close to the edge sometimes.

I am sure that if you adjust the tone of your posts down a litle bit and avoid long discussions with some stubborn FMs, the likelyhood of further sanctions might diminish.
”

yeah i know
i have been trying as well
its just when i sink my teeth into something i find it difficult to let go.
and i have a very low tolerance for poor logic.
and people who will not admit to being wrong .... this affects my personal life heavily. but it could be worse. at least i am aware of (some of) my foibles

I'm tryin', Ringo
Last edited by presshardy : 06-02-2005 at 02:10
Deerd
06-02-2005
Originally Posted by presshardy:
“yeah i know
i have been trying as well
its just when i sink my teeth into something i find it difficult to let go.
and i have a very low tolerance for poor logic.
and people who will not admit to being wrong .... this affects my personal life heavily. but it could be worse. at least i am aware of (some of) my foibles”

Maybe Dany was sometimes, also, aware but followed the offence-defence adage - i don't know...i can appreciate your frustrations BUT many of Dany's points were offered (however cack-handedly) as subjective opinion - the simple realm of DS:BB, for better or worse. Those which were offered as 'matters of fact' (unadulterated) were fair game for challenge - however, even challenge of those points did appear to, sometimes, verge on hounding.

Dany frequently seemed muddled (logically - presshardy, you did throw in a few logical fallicies yourself, along the way ) but there was, sometimes, valid and sum and substance to the point Dany desired (however badly) to make.

It got messy...all to blame, not just one?
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map