|
||||||||
Alleged leaked voting figures from last week |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 59
|
Alleged leaked voting figures from last week
This was posted on the X Factor Forums at Popjustice and removed so take with a pinch of salt but someone alleged they had a friend who worked in the production side of the show who told him the rough figures of last week which were-
(This was the vote after Shellie so not the flash vote) Sam B- approx. 30% Nicholas- approx. 17% Abi- approx. 9% Sam C- approx. 8% Rough Copy- approx. 8% Kingsland Road- approx. 7% Tamera- approx. 6% Luke- approx. 5% Miss Dynamix- approx. 4% Hannah- approx. 4% Lorna- approx. 2% |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,228
|
IF these are correct, then I must say I do not approve of Sam C being so high.
Hannah being second bottom seems unlikely though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 524
|
This is about what I would have expected, so I tend believe it is real.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 16,707
|
I don't think they are correct. On the basis that Hannah was that low, and Tamera was that low too. I suppose Miss Dynamix are correct, I think Rough Copy will be higher than that to be honest.
Only Daily Star are to be trusted with voting leaks (they were right about Christopher & Eoghan topping the votes week-after-week). |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 306
|
I doubt they're correct...
Hot favourites being so low etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,835
|
Quote:
I doubt they're correct...
Hot favourites being so low etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,009
|
TBH, while it's not where I would have predicted them to be, it is believable if you look back at previous series voting results.
At the start of the show you have one or two runaways with the rest sharing the vote dangerously close to each other and the two sharing the top in that post are plausible. Hannah was pretty much sabotaged on Sat, the death slow with shite viewing figures and a really anti-climatic performance. Sam B and Nicholas are the types who often lead the show at the start and then start to wane, with usually one of them coming 3rd 4th. The ones who look strong normally mince about in the middle, one having a shock exit half way through and the others gradually dropping one by one. The winner normally accelerates from the bottom quarter of the results. So they are possible and if they were correct, it's probably looking promising for Hannah lol. I have a feeling the top 4 will be Hannah, Rough Copy/Kingsland Road (one will fly, the other will fall and it could be either of them), Nicholas and Sam B. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 7,744
|
I can't see Sam Callahan getting higher than Kingsland and Rough Copy. Abi....eh maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 524
|
Quote:
I don't think they are correct. On the basis that Hannah was that low, and Tamera was that low too. I suppose Miss Dynamix are correct, I think Rough Copy will be higher than that to be honest.
Only Daily Star are to be trusted with voting leaks (they were right about Christopher & Eoghan topping the votes week-after-week). Tamera was dissapointing compared to her amazing performance at judges houses so I expect her to be in the middle somewherbe. Rough copy are in the upper half which is where I expected them to be. They are a bit overhyped IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,009
|
Quote:
I believe it because Hannah was first on when Strictly was on at the same time and her performance was OK but forgettable.
Tamera was dissapointing compared to her amazing performance at judges houses so I expect her to be in the middle somewherbe. Rough copy are in the upper half which is where I expected them to be. They are a bit overhyped IMO. Also as it's a weak year, expect the results to be all over the place as it usually is when it's a lackluster year. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,863
|
Quote:
I can't see Sam Callahan getting higher than Kingsland and Rough Copy. Abi....eh maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
Quote:
sam c has a huge amount of support, I would belive that he is that high up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,894
|
Load of rubbish don't believe it .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 524
|
Quote:
Yeah the teenie girls voting for the "he iz well hot innit" Sam C. I don't believe the figures anyway, however, Sam B could well of been the top of the vote, the very least second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 858
|
Let's wait for the Daily Star to tell us...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 19,783
|
Quote:
This is about what I would have expected, so I tend believe it is real.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,009
|
Quote:
99.9999999 times out of 100 things like this posted on message boards are complete nonsense. So it almost certainly is not true.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,169
|
As said earlier, the daily star are the only credible paper for leaks, they are who the x factor inform when they want the public to find out who is topping the vote, usually happens around week 4/5.
I wouldnt be suprised if that is about right though, except nicholas would be closer to the top if not top |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,069
|
Biggest pile of BS I've read today!
![]() LOL. No way was Hannah and Tamera that low. :yawn: Tamera has a massive fanbase and we voted loads for her on Saturday. OP your "friend" seems to be taking the p*ss. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 16,707
|
OP's been banned already.
Presumably for trolling? He was probably trolling here too. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,069
|
Quote:
OP's been banned already.
Presumably for trolling? He was probably trolling here too. Knew it.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,974
|
Excuse me! Ella and james was low and they were very good and clear favourites!! People might assume there already safe.
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,278
|
Hannah could easily have been that low. The first person to perform in the first live show never does well. I think for the first 7 years the first to perform was in the bottom 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,009
|
Quote:
Biggest pile of BS I've read today!
![]() LOL. No way was Hannah and Tamera that low. :yawn: Tamera has a massive fanbase and we voted loads for her on Saturday. OP your "friend" seems to be taking the p*ss. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 16,707
|
Quote:
Hannah could easily have been that low. The first person to perform in the first live show never does well. I think for the first 7 years the first to perform was in the bottom 2.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:15.




