|
||||||||
EastEnders - Sharon in today's episode |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,362
|
EastEnders - Sharon in today's episode
The writers are clearly making Sharon more and more unlikable in every scene. Sharon said to Ronnie to "disappear"... That was low for Sharon.. This is coming from a massive fan of Sharon myself.
Why are the writers destroying Sharon so badly?? It's like they are doing this on purpose... |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,990
|
Good on Sharon
I love her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,096
|
Sharon was A grade Bitch tonight.
Then again she's been exactly that since her return. The way she's been developed and written has been horrific. If I was Ronnie, I'd have told her to F off. :sleep: |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Posts: 2,896
|
She deserves a huge public humiliation/dressing down accompanied by a slap,the behaviour of her little brat Denny is hopefully leading up to this. Think Cora or Bianca is best placed to deliver the slap!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
|
Seems to me Sharon is the only one who has had a realistic reaction to Ronnie. In real life most people in the community would want Ronnie to "dissapear".
But I don't really mind. I'm actually kind of thankful for Ronnie's return - it means I can argue how great it would be for Cindy or Chrissie to come back too and not have anyone who supported Ronnie's return shout "realism" at me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Seems to me Sharon is the only one who has had a realistic reaction to Ronnie. In real life most people in the community would want Ronnie to "dissapear".
But I don't really mind. I'm actually kind of thankful for Ronnie's return - it means I can argue how great it would be for Cindy or Chrissie to come back too and not have anyone who supported Ronnie's return shout "realism" at me. Ronnie is not back from saving starving children in Africa. She is back from committing a heinous crime and having no issue upsetting her victims being there. Sam Womack got hassle just for playing Ronnie ,imagine if that was true to life. Alfie and Sharon are the only ones acting realistically. In fact I think if anything Sharon has not said enough, she would get worse in real life. If I owned a business and the majority shareholder had someone look after it I would not let them tell me to do anything let alone something not in my job description. And after her bitchy comment to Kirsty I would tell her where to go. Legally Ronnie cant do (mind the pun) Jack sh"t. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
Quote:
Exactly. Ronnie owns NOTHING in the business,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,012
|
Quote:
Seems to me Sharon is the only one who has had a realistic reaction to Ronnie. In real life most people in the community would want Ronnie to "dissapear".
But I don't really mind. I'm actually kind of thankful for Ronnie's return - it means I can argue how great it would be for Cindy or Chrissie to come back too and not have anyone who supported Ronnie's return shout "realism" at me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
More lies yet again. Ronnie has herself stated that she has a 41% share in the business. Sharon has like 19% or something that was given to her by Phil out of pity. Let's not let your hatred for the character cloud the facts.
![]() So not lies. Clearly you have no idea how a business works if you don't know the difference between ownership, power of attorney or being an employee. She doesn't own anything, Phil owns it. Big difference. He did not sign it over to her. Phi owns 41%, Sharon owns 19% and Janine owns 40%. They are the business OWNERS. Ronnie doesn't not own it she was "looking after it". And do not call me a liar because your ignorant about the way a business works. Just as you are about the law. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,726
|
I say kill her off and get rid for good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Sharon should mind her own business. she wasnt even around when the baby swap happened
And if the same person bitched about me and down to me at my place of a business I owned she would told to do one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
Quote:
Phil didn't GIVE it to her. Which is why when she fell out with Phil he didn't give her the JOB back. If she owns it she can come and go as she pleases. She owns nothing. He did not sign it over to her. He let her look after them
So not lies. Clearly you have no idea how a business works if you don't know the difference between ownership, power of attorney or being an employee. She doesn't own anything, Phil owns it. Big difference. He did not sign it over to her. Phi owns 41%, Sharon owns 19% and Janine owns 40%. They are the business OWNERS. Ronnie doesn't not own it she was "looking after it". And do not call me a liar because your ignorant about the way a business works. Just as you are about the law. I think you should make sure your facts are straight next time. Sharon has the least amount of equity of all the business owners. Phil has the most, Ronnie and Janine both have 20% and Sharon has the small remainder. That's how it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,096
|
Sharon isn't annoyed at anything Ronnie said 2/3 weeks ago about a toilet or stealing a baby. It's simply because she's the one Jack loves and the reason why Jack couldn't marry her. This is what it's about, nothing else. Sharon was hostile towards Ronnie from the off.
I'm no Ronnie fan but tonight it was Sharon simply kicking her when she was down and twisting the knife in. Sharon is being a bitch because thats how she's written these days. I mean look how she's been with Ava and Dot...? It doesn't just stop at Ronnie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,096
|
What does it matter who owns how much. Both were given hand outs by Phil. Niether earned the club (in this current time).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,551
|
I hope Ronnie and Roxy own the club again in time with no interference from Phil, Janine and Sharon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Janine does not own 40% of the club. She owns 20% because Roxy sold her shares to her instead of Phil. Ronnie owns 20% of the club, but at the time she was acting as the majority shareholder on the instruction of Phil.
I think you should make sure your facts are straight next time. Sharon has the least amount of equity of all the business owners. Phil has the most, Ronnie and Janine both have 20% and Sharon has the small remainder. That's how it is. Ronnie doesn't own anything if she didn't she doesn't need to ask for her job back. She said herself she was looking after it. But don't take my word. Take Phils. So don't tell me to get my facts straight. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2wTqCc1Bpo Fast Forward to 21:25 Sharon: "19% ?" Phil: "The most I can give you without losing control to Janine" like I said that's basic maths. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,413
|
Ronnie does NOT own any part of the club, she sold her share in 2009 to Jack. At the moment, Phil owns 41%, Janine owns 40% and Sharon owns 19%. That's it.
Sharon was a bitch tonight, but she had a point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,740
|
[quote=sarahcadhill;69254975]The writers are clearly making Sharon more and more unlikable in every scene. Sharon said to Ronnie to "disappear"... That was low for Sharon.. This is coming from a massive fan of Sharon myself.
Why are the writers destroying Sharon so badly?? It's like they are doing this on purpose...[/QUOTE] I doubt the writers have some sort of grudge against Letitia Dean / Sharon. If there was a vendetta she could take legal action which she hasn't done. Personally I think Sharon is badly acted and I would like to see the back of her. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
What does it matter who owns how much. Both were given hand outs by Phil. Niether earned the club (in this current time).
If people think being bitchy is out of character for Sharon, that's an entirely different matter. But Zoe Slater might disagree!!! Though I do feel that in former times, Sharon tended to rise above it way more than they are writing her these days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
I doubt the writers have some sort of grudge against Letitia Dean / Sharon. If there was a vendetta she could take legal action which she hasn't done. Personally I think Sharon is badly acted and I would like to see the back of her. It's like they write the scenes these days and then think of a character to add to the dialogue. Anyone will do. They no longer write for the characters imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,002
|
She just can't bear the fact that Jack preferred Ronnie to her. Also that she is a proper Mitchell, not a has been.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 93
|
according Wikipedia ronnie owns 20% janine 20% sharron 20% phil 41%
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,342
|
Sharon and sadie chatting tonight wonder how they will progress with each other
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,609
|
Get rid of her. Awful character, awfully written and badly acted. Kill her off!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
according Wikipedia ronnie owns 20% janine 20% sharron 20% phil 41%
Ah I see now Biffo has 2 new accounts posting in here Zzzz (not aimed at you Joshua) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:39.



I love her.
