|
||||||||
No IPhone 5S discussion? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 3,345
|
Quote:
You do realise that any security system has flaws? Somebody could far more easily look over your shoulder as you're typing in your passcode. You do also realise that IOS7 does not allow phones to be wiped/reused without the users' Apple ID and pass?
The fact is this 'flaw' with Touch ID requires the person to have access to a perfect copy of the fingerprint used to unlocked your phone (you can only have four), have access to the technology to photograph, clean up, and reproduce the print, and have access to your phone; and the moment you notice your phone is missing you can remotely track/block it within seconds. I've never heard such a ridiculous argument before in my life. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
|
Quote:
We dont require hypotheticals the exploit has been verified.
But now that you hypothetically have my phone, talk me through how you would actually go about gaining access to it. What with it being so straightforward and all.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
The only hypothetical was you having my phone. I didn't want to suggest you would steal it after all.
But now that you hypothetically have my phone, talk me through how you would actually go about gaining access to it. What with it being so straightforward and all.... Point is i guess is it's not even close to as secure as apple made out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Homerton, London, E9
Posts: 1,742
|
There's nothing to discuss the phone is exactly the same as the last one with the addition of a novelty fingerprint scanner
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 404
|
Quote:
There's nothing to discuss the phone is exactly the same as the last one with the addition of a novelty fingerprint scanner
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Homerton, London, E9
Posts: 1,742
|
Quote:
And the faster processer, better battery life, improved camera etc. so whilst not a huge amount has changed its hardly "exactly" the same....things can't be "exactly" the same if they have additions......anyway carry on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 404
|
Quote:
Average iPhone user won't notice or care hence the non-discussion going on here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,865
|
Quote:
Average iPhone user won't notice or care hence the non-discussion going on here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 404
|
Quote:
I'm an average iPhone user and I've seen a huge difference between my iPhone 5 and 5s. Especially the battery life which is much better and the gerneral increased speeds accessing Apps and Safari.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,058
|
Quote:
The only hypothetical was you having my phone. I didn't want to suggest you would steal it after all.
But now that you hypothetically have my phone, talk me through how you would actually go about gaining access to it. What with it being so straightforward and all.... As an iPhone user I thought you would be more adept at accessing information on the internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
You do realise that any security system has flaws? Somebody could far more easily look over your shoulder as you're typing in your passcode. You do also realise that IOS7 does not allow phones to be wiped/reused without the users' Apple ID and pass?
The fact is this 'flaw' with Touch ID requires the person to have access to a perfect copy of the fingerprint used to unlocked your phone (you can only have four), have access to the technology to photograph, clean up, and reproduce the print, and have access to your phone; and the moment you notice your phone is missing you can remotely track/block it within seconds. I've never heard such a ridiculous argument before in my life. someone discovers your PIN - you change it. someone discovers your pattern - you change it. fingerprints (and faces to a degree) cant be changed ..... now for the average man/woman on the street probably not an issue - but for anyone wanting genuine security, and being in a position where someone would put time and effort into breaking your security, its a pretty easy one to crack. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,865
|
Quote:
isnt the problem with fingerprint tech the fact that once someone has hacked it the security is gone .... forever ....
someone discovers your PIN - you change it. someone discovers your pattern - you change it. fingerprints (and faces to a degree) cant be changed ..... now for the average man/woman on the street probably not an issue - but for anyone wanting genuine security, and being in a position where someone would put time and effort into breaking your security, its a pretty easy one to crack. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
It isn't easy at all despite some peoples examples wihout providing proof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 🇬🇧
Posts: 60,865
|
Quote:
Like i said, when an exploit is found, it only ever gets easier in time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
|
Quote:
Asked and answered.
As an iPhone user I thought you would be more adept at accessing information on the internet ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
It isn't easy at all despite some peoples examples wihout providing proof.
touch ID is at best useful for low level security - at worst its a little worrying IMHO. Biometrics really shouldnt be 'played with'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
Until then, me and millions of others are thrilled with the fingerprint ID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
I was hoping you could talk me through it as a typical opportunistic thief, rather than the very specific controlled environment that was written about on the net.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
|
Quote:
You know when any exploit is found, it only gets easier to do right?
Point is i guess is it's not even close to as secure as apple made out. IIRC they made a big play about how many people (around 50%) don't bother using a passcode. And that Touch ID's main goal was, as much as anything, to make it more convenient so that more people would at least have some security rather than none. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
Until then, me and millions of others are thrilled with the fingerprint ID.
and thats not a dig at Apple - same goes for the HTC One Max (with fingerprint) and Dell laptops etc. Dont forget Apple arent the first to do this. Look at the recent news about the US monitoring calls and texts - stuff happens ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Crystal Palace TX
Posts: 19,702
|
Quote:
no. im not saying its a 5 minute job. but taking the recent spate of celeb phone hacking. im sure that someone out there would be prepared to put a little time and effort into cloning celeb/politician fingerprints ..... once someone has a copy of your fingerprint you cant go out and change it again.
touch ID is at best useful for low level security - at worst its a little worrying IMHO. Biometrics really shouldnt be 'played with'. |
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
How secure did Apple make it out to be?
IIRC they made a big play about how many people (around 50%) don't bother using a passcode. And that Touch ID's main goal was, as much as anything, to make it more convenient so that more people would at least have some security rather than none. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
How secure did Apple make it out to be?
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5949 Quote:
IIRC they made a big play about how many people (around 50%) don't bother using a passcode. And that Touch ID's main goal was, as much as anything, to make it more convenient so that more people would at least have some security rather than none.
They also said this which was probably nonsense and sheer guess work.Quick question. Do you actually have to use the fingerprint scanner? Or can it be turned off? |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
TouchID is an addition to pass codes and passwords (not instead of). It's more about convenience. Even if you can defeat the fingerprint reader, if you take too long, mess it up too many times, significantly change geographic position, let the battery run down, reboot the phone, or try and turn off location tracking or disable any security feature you will be forced to enter your password.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,091
|
Quote:
i do think its a great little novelty item at face value. i just worry that if its not been made secure enough then it screws up fingerprint biometric use forever. someone figures out how to harvest all the apple fingerprint data and thats fingerprint use for online banking (etc) knackered. All for a quick unlock.
and thats not a dig at Apple - same goes for the HTC One Max (with fingerprint) and Dell laptops etc. Dont forget Apple arent the first to do this. Look at the recent news about the US monitoring calls and texts - stuff happens ! It's more about convenience than security. It provides the same level of security as a passcode lock but saves time, particularly as it can also be used for iTunes and App Store purchases. It's worked really well for me so far, anyway. I just press the home button as I normally would to unlock, then keep my thumb on the button and I'm straight in. The whole thing takes under a second and is tied to an action that I would have taken anyway. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:53.




