|
||||||||
Should EastEnders do Dallas and pretend everything was a dream? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Should EastEnders do Dallas and pretend everything was a dream?
Should EastEnders consign the whole Berridge era to a character's subconcious and make it all one big dream (or nightmare
). It might save EE. Characters like Barry could make a return (and when did Roy die?).It may give EE a bit more credibility as Den's resurrection would have all been a dream. |
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,138
|
I thought that Debbie did Dallas already?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,281
|
That's not funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,444
|
lol- I think they are doing a good job of repairing it thus far anyway though.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I'd like to see Paul's death not really be true, I actually liked the character, and the actor.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
---deleted post---
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vodka Squirrel
I'd like to see Paul's death not really be true, I actually liked the character, and the actor.
They had really begun to do great things with the character then they decided to do a complete u-turn with him for some reason. I at least wish they hadn't found the body.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I don't know why they had to kill him off anyway, unless it is part of the laughable gangster Andy's downfall. EE has axed some characters that it shouldn't have in the past year or so - Kelly and now Paul - but seemed to drag its feet over getting rid of the Ferreiras. I feel sorry for the actors who play that family actually, they were given total rubbish to act with - although only the actor who plays the eldest son is actually any good I suppose!
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,101
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCJ
It may give EE a bit more credibility as Den's resurrection would have all been a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pistonbroke
Great Idea. No Dennis and No Shannis.
![]()
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 7,708
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCJ
Should EastEnders consign the whole Berridge era to a character's subconcious and make it all one big dream (or nightmare
). It might save EE. Characters like Barry could make a return (and when did Roy die?).It may give EE a bit more credibility as Den's resurrection would have all been a dream. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Safra
Making it a dream would probably Kill EE rather than save it!
Neighbours had a dog that had a wet dream anyone remember that?
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen-Of-Walford
I think that is what he wants.
Neighbours had a dog that had a wet dream anyone remember that?
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCJ
Was it really a wet dream? Did it invlove sexual animal images?
![]() It was not sexual but you know what it was getting at. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Walford, E20
Posts: 6,561
|
Absoloutely not, the "it was all a dream" scenario would kill it completely. No, all soaps have their dodgy patches and EastEnders has come through a bad one, changes and repairs are being made and the show is already getting better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen-Of-Walford
I think that is what he wants.
Neighbours had a dog that had a wet dream anyone remember that?
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I think it woulde be brilliant for it to all be a dream. It'd get the viewers excited.
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,553
|
I don’t think I could handle Sid Owen’s attempts at acting again!
But on the plus side – No Dennis Rickman would be utter bliss!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSarge
I don’t think I could handle Sid Owen’s attempts at acting again?
But on the plus side – No Dennis Rickman would be utter bliss!! |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,553
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCJ
No shannis, no Berridge, non of the crap over the past year.
Lol, just getting in some early practice .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 545
|
It'd be too difficult getting everyone and everything back to how they were. Sets would have to be changed, and actor's contracts negioated if they were to return.
Be good if it could happen though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngpassion
It'd be too difficult getting everyone and everything back to how they were. Sets would have to be changed, and actor's contracts negioated if they were to return.
Be good if it could happen though.
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:56.

). It might save EE. Characters like Barry could make a return (and when did Roy die?).

They had really begun to do great things with the character then they decided to do a complete u-turn with him for some reason.
I at least wish they hadn't found the body.