I didn't warm to Ola until her partnership with Chris Hollins. That series she came across as warm and fun and I will always now see her that way.

I don't especially like Kristina's dancing but she comes across like a warm person to me too.

Like others who have posted, I cannot see why a woman cannot be photographed looking overtly sexy without being personally attacked. Women have a right to express their sexuality just as men do. I suppose if one of them was raped you'd think they were asking for it, madetomeasure?

JEEZUS!!!! Talkin about BITCHY!!!

I like both women, they are sexy little minxes and good bloody luck to them!!!

I like the word "minxes" summertime.

If they want to cash in on their fame they could advertise hairspray or eyelashes. They could use their fame to highlight any number of causes such as child brides,foodbanks or start dance schools in rundown areas.

Oh dear, why do you think that? It must be on your mind to have made such a sick presumption. Yes Summertime, I'm bitching just like you probably do and many other countless FMs on threads - okay.

A good point indeed Belmontbabe. I somehow think though that the niceties that are portrayed on the show don't extend off stage in terms of how easy it is to put on a business brain v getting your kit off on a beach for a calendar shoot. That applies to the men as well.

I enjoy watching Kristina dance.

I can take or leave Ola and find a lot of her choreo very samey.

Yes quite a few comments have raised that point and I agree. I'd better make reference to her dancing otherwise our school monitors will be on my back

Just pointing out how close you are, on that continuum of misogyny, to stepping right beyond the pale, sunshine. Look again at your comments and reflect.

This whole thread stinks. One person's 'showing off' is another person's idea of good choreography.

It's just an excuse for a bitchfest.

Yeah and it's worked lmao

Wow...I like both girls, in fact I really like Kristina.

Well not completely, in a true bitchfest everyone joins in.

I've always found Kristina a bit overpowering. Like she'd be best at home wearing patches of undyed cow leather with great big stitches on like "2 million years BC", cavorting around the tribal fire, and coming out of her a pungent but strangely appealing smell like deer musk hanging in the air.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by this.

I don't like or dislike them. How can I when I don't know them. Just think its a shame they (or anybody else male or female) don't use their fame and clout to do some good. Spreading your legs for money from the Daily Mail isn't really a good role model.

Like this, you mean?

http://www.about-romford.com/Dance-S...rity-Ball.html

http://www.officialkristinarihanoff.com/charity.html

Good stuff.

or this, you mean?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/oth...irmingham.html

I take it you are also as precious about derogatory comments about everybody on the series? For instance, Bruce is called an old fool and other such disrespecful terms, Claudia has her own threads where she's ripped into about what she wears and her face. You seem to have taken such a huge interest though in this particular thread yet I don't see you say anything to those posters who slag off presenters. A bitchfest is going on on those threads - care to pop on there and give your 'advice.'

Believe it or not, I actually found the topic of this thread interesting, you raised some very discussion worthy points, but as I and others attempted, politely, to point out, your choice of words was, like it or not, bound to provoke a response other than that you considered reasonable (a tad strange I have to say when you were at the same time defending your own right to post in your own manner).

You then appeared to post somewhat gleefully that your all-along intention to attempt a "bitchfest" had worked - and yet you objected when I point out, quite correctly, that we didn't all go along with it.

I've commented many times in many threads on the nature of people's language and tone where I actually found the topic less interesting, I thought it more worthwhile in this one as there was an issue underneath worth discussing, though admittedly I've now been disabused of that view.

I could reply that, conversely, you seem particularly keen to respond to my comments as opposed to those of others who've used far more direct language towards you than I. So at the very least, that leaves us pretty much equal IMO.

I'm quite prepared to leave things there, if you are.

Well not quite sure why you you directed your observation about a bitchfest when I wasn't the one who asserted that - I answered it in the way I saw fit. You said it couldn't be a bitchfest as not everyone had partaken; yet you didn't aim that comment at the instigator of the comment. The underlying issues can be debated via social science arguments - please feel free to go ahead and do that. You keep honing in on my posts and I've given you the benefit of the doubt once - you love the argument. Your last line "I'm quite prepared to leave things here, if you are" lends weight to that. I've been civil to you here and I'm sure I've seen you on other threads but I'm just going to ignore you. I don't mind somebody objecting but when they act like a dog with a bone in their mouth over something on an entertainment thread, then no thanks.

As you are now ignoring me you won't see this, but thanks for your response

Ah, Wazzyboy, great result for you!!