Originally Posted by Cellomad:
“Bruce is a legend - he is wonderful for his age and really entertaining too!
We have become a sad society if we cannot value what people of all ages are able to provide. Entertainment is not all about pretty air heads.”
With respect, this argument doesn't make sense.
1.) Why does "valuing" the contribution of all ages mean keeping someone on a job they're no longer fit to hold? A statement like that seems to excuse both lack of performance and relevance--shoving them aside for unmeasurable meters of performance like "he's due respect because he's an institution".
Lets pretend you are on a train. The Engineer has been running this train from age 30 to a current age of 80. Are you going to feel more assured of your safe ride because you respect that he's been at the job for 50 years? Its nonsense. And while TV presenting doesn't endanger anyone, it's a similar concept. Being old doesn't mean the show is magically better because you are on it. It means that when you STOP being funny or relevant that people clap you on the back, assure you that you've made an incredible contribution which will always be remembered, and you get remembered with a nice fat retirement bonus. And your dignity as intact as possible.
2.) The part about Entertainment not being about airheads is especially ironic given how blunt and obvious most of the jokes told by Bruce are. There's no intelligence or wit to his current crop of jokes. He's not exactly Stephen Fry.
The man deserves respect, sure. But not blind worship and endless employment.