• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
When Eccleston turned them down why didn't they call Paul McGann instead of John Hurt
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
Corwin
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Sladen:
“Assuming that she could see events that had occurred within the Timelock. Or are those stored within his timeline, regardless of timelocking?

So why not Hurt's experiences...

For McGann's experiences, perhaps she just saw the TV Movie's events with the Master, then the Time War heated up, then a blackout, as he could not bear to incorporate certain memories into his timeline...”


Well we know that's not true since she saw him on a palm tree filled beach at one point (possibly on an adventure with the 2nd Doctor).

Clara was supposedly split into a million pieces (even if it wasn't really quite that many) she would have seen each Doctor 1000's of times.


Plus of course if all Moffat wanted was an older 8th Doctor he would have cast the now older Paul McGann.
Eighth Doctor
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Sladen:
“It would, however, close a continuity loophole by giving them a reason to never bring the Eighth Doctor back or mention him ever again...”

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
be more pacific
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Sladen:
“It would, however, close a continuity loophole by giving them a reason to never bring the Eighth Doctor back or mention him ever again...”

If Moffat and BBC Wales didn't want the Eighth Doctor mentioned again, they simply wouldn't mention him again. Building the 50th anniversary special around an aged version of the Eighth Doctor would be a ludicrous way to sweep that incarnation under the carpet.
Sladen
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“If Moffat and BBC Wales didn't want the Eighth Doctor mentioned again, they simply wouldn't mention him again. Building the 50th anniversary special around an aged version of the Eighth Doctor would be a ludicrous way to sweep that incarnation under the carpet.”

Yes, first a HUGE mention of him, then never again...

They have previously not really wanted to talk about the Eighth Doctor. Has nobody noticed that? Now he gets his day in the sun and goes out with a bang. You can't top that.

Originally Posted by Eighth Doctor:
“NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Sorry, man...but they've kind of been hinting about this since Nine took responsibility for what happened during the Time War's last days. "I MADE it happen!"
be more pacific
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Sladen:
“Yes, first a HUGE mention of him, then never again...

They have previously not really wanted to talk about the Eighth Doctor. Has nobody noticed that? Now he gets his day in the sun and goes out with a bang. You can't top that.



Sorry, man...but they've kind of been hinting about this since Nine took responsibility for what happened during the Time War's last days. "I MADE it happen!"”

But John Hurt has already tweeted...
Spoiler
"we will have a lot of fun" to Peter Capaldi on the day he was announced as the new Doctor. So Hurt's incarnation (whichever number it may be) will almost certainly be mentioned and seen again.
Eighth Doctor
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Sladen:
“Yes, first a HUGE mention of him, then never again...

They have previously not really wanted to talk about the Eighth Doctor. Has nobody noticed that? Now he gets his day in the sun and goes out with a bang. You can't top that.”

Not really. He's been referenced on screen about as much as every other classic Doctor, the BBC frequently have his Big Finish adventures on Iplayer, Matt Smith has said he'd like to work with McGann and Moffat was full of praise on the recent BBC America DW revisited documentary.
Sladen
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Eighth Doctor:
“Not really. He's been referenced on screen about as much as every other classic Doctor, the BBC frequently have his Big Finish adventures on Iplayer, Matt Smith has said he'd like to work with McGann and Moffat was full of praise on the recent BBC America DW revisited documentary.”

All of these adventures can take place between the TV Movie and "becoming" John Hurt's Doctor.

As for Hurt appearing again after the 50th Special, YES PLEASE!

Also, I claim no inside information.
Sam Bell v. 548
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by soulou:
“Paul McGann may be popular with "fans" but his presence would mean little to the casual viewer, which is probably the majority of viewers. He is just that guy from that awful movie. John Hurt is a big, well respected name. Can you imagine the final scenes of The Name of the Doctor having the same impact with Paul as they did with John Hurt? I can't.”

The Daleks, Cybermen, Ice Warriors, Sontarans, Sarah-Jane smith, UNIT, the Brigadere, etc, etc all meant nothing to the casual viewer yet they have all featured in Nu-Who. There have been countless clips and mentions of previous Dr's, including the trailer for the 50th. It shouldn't mean that the whole previous 50 years should be swept aside and new Dr's shoe-horned in because someone somewhere might be confused.

I always believed that Ecclestone was sounded out about returning quite a while ago before the script was written so that Moffatt could get an idea of what story he could tell. Ecclestone said no thanks and so Moffatt has written a story that doesn't feature him. Shame it isn't for McGann but then I think Moffatt gets a kick at of changing the past. Basically when he finally hands over the role to somebody new he can look back and say that Doctor Who has his signature all over it, all the way back to Hartnell.
saxy
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by soulou:
“Paul McGann may be popular with "fans" but his presence would mean little to the casual viewer, which is probably the majority of viewers. He is just that guy from that awful movie. John Hurt is a big, well respected name. Can you imagine the final scenes of The Name of the Doctor having the same impact with Paul as they did with John Hurt? I can't.”

Personally I'd have squealed with joy & delight in much the same way as I did when Peter Capaldi was announced as the 12th Doctor.

And then I'd have done a little dance.
Irma Bunt
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by James_Vick:
“IT'S THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY IT SHOULD BE FOR THE FANS NOT THE CASUAL VIEWERS”

That sentence is so wrong. But it perfectly sums up what is wrong with fanoraks.
Bruce Wayne
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Irma Bunt:
“That sentence is so wrong. But it perfectly sums up what is wrong with fanoraks.”

The member you were responding to has been banished. No need to get upset with him.
Irma Bunt
04-11-2013
Originally Posted by Bruce Wayne:
“The member you were responding to has been banished. No need to get upset with him.”

I'm not, to be honest. But one sees this attitude amongst a (thankfully) small number of fans. Of course, a 50th anniversary should have nods and winks to the dedicated fans and no-one would dispute that. The Corrie anniversary did. Skyfall did. But neither of those productions was made solely for the die-hard fans, nor should they. It's the same with Who. The last thing the show needs is references to the past shoehorned in so more casual viewers watch and think "What's this old thing, I'm watching?"

The day a long-running series starts making shows solely for the fans, is the day it enters its death throes. We've only to look at Doctor Who in the late 80s to see what happens when the monkeys take over the zoo! Fortunately, I believe the majority of intelligent fans know that.
SpringheelJack
05-11-2013
In answer to the original poster...

Because maybe Paul McGann has another role to play in the Special?

JCR
09-11-2013
Originally Posted by performingmonk:
“If Billie's in it (which she is, as part of the main cast list), she's Rose. Nothing else would make sense. Especially as the 'Moment' If she was that the Doctor would already know her before the 2005 series.”

I wasn't expecting the moment to look like a Rose, I must say.
-----
09-11-2013
Nice point.......I wonder if they intended that.
Any idea if Rose has the Tardis in her head, her eyes are glowing.
As for this threads original question, IMO they wanted a very old 8, ie (sorry John), someone who looks like they are waiting for the Co-op to deliver a box.
This is 8's last day, and of course they are still able to fill in with Paul at any time up to John if they want after Dark Eyes audio, last part I believe is released 2015.
Vopiscus
09-11-2013
Originally Posted by JCR:
“I wasn't expecting the moment to look like a Rose, I must say. ”

Strange choice to put it on a plinth decorated with pictures of beer bottles, IMO.
Corwin
09-11-2013
Originally Posted by Vopiscus:
“Strange choice to put it on a plinth decorated with pictures of beer bottles, IMO.”

From top to bottom we have

Rose + Crown + Beer Bottles = The Rose and Crown Pub.
The_Bonobo
09-11-2013
Originally Posted by soulou:
“Paul McGann may be popular with "fans" but his presence would mean little to the casual viewer, which is probably the majority of viewers. He is just that guy from that awful movie. John Hurt is a big, well respected name. Can you imagine the final scenes of The Name of the Doctor having the same impact with Paul as they did with John Hurt? I can't.”

Originally Posted by Sam Bell v. 548:
“The Daleks, Cybermen, Ice Warriors, Sontarans, Sarah-Jane smith, UNIT, the Brigadere, etc, etc all meant nothing to the casual viewer yet they have all featured in Nu-Who.”

It is true that the fanboy/girl stuff becomes a bit ridiculous in the overall context but there are surely touchstones,
that not just casual viewers, but basically most people will and did recognise.
Such as Daleks and Cybermen.

As for McGann... as much as it would work as a "nod" he is somewhat obscure to the general audience. Surely. ?
-----
09-11-2013
I agree, but, at some point for all the boys & girls out there in new who land, especially in other countries where they don't have access to all this info etc they will have to explain who John is in the story as he exists before Chris, just as Paul did.
I'm still sticking to the extremely old 8th doctor........I mean he wouldn't regen into somebody looking that old, he's been in the wars as the saying goes, literally, ie Waiter, may I order a coffin please.....(sorry John).
be more pacific
09-11-2013
Originally Posted by -----:
“I agree, but, at some point for all the boys & girls out there in new who land, especially in other countries where they don't have access to all this info etc they will have to explain who John is in the story as he exists before Chris, just as Paul did.
I'm still sticking to the extremely old 8th doctor........I mean he wouldn't regen into somebody looking that old, he's been in the wars as the saying goes, literally, ie Waiter, may I order a coffin please.....(sorry John).”

Yet clips and photos of 8th Doctor's face have appeared on-screen in montages since The Next Doctor. He bears no physical resemblance whatsoever to John Hurt.
-----
09-11-2013
If your right, then based on the leaked trailer Paul must have died and become John, and he's been fighting for ages to end up looking like that.
be more pacific
09-11-2013
Well, the 11th Doctor has hardly aged in over 200 years. While Moffat has made it clear (in the recent interview) that the Hurt Doctor has been fighting for a long time, there's no evidence to suggest this incarnation would have looked significantly younger when he was 'born'. Jon Pertwee's Doctor was 'born' looking like a 50-something human and the same will soon happen with Peter Capaldi's Doctor.
-----
09-11-2013
So we agree then, as Moff said he's been at it a long time, and he's a regen of Paul because clara saw all 11 faces of him etc.
John637
09-11-2013
Originally Posted by James_Vick:
“When Eccleston turned them down why didn't they call Paul McGann instead of John Hurt?

Up until recentaly we believed McGann's Doctor fought in and ended the Time War. Why Moffat though it was a good idea too create another Doctor when Eccleston turned it down is beyond me. They should have just called up Paul McGann, he still looks looks close enough to what he did in 1996 that it would be believable, he does look a little older but that can be explain easily as we don't know how long the McGann body lasted for.

Please don't misquote me and think that I don't like John Hurt, I do like him he's a fantastic and it'll be interesting to see his interpenetration of the Doctor if nothing else. But the main reason this annoys me somewhat is that McGann is the most unappreciated Doctor of all due to all having one on-screen adventure, he really deserves more screen time and he what's appear in the show again so I really don't get why Moffat's did what he did but then again why that man does anything is beyond me.”

If Moffat had an idea for the story involving a "secret" Doctor, it wouldn't make sense writing it for the 8th Doctor, since we've aready seen him. As for your assertion that CE "turned them down" you're presuming an awful lot that we aren't party to. Just one hypothesis: SM wanted a regeneration scene between JH and CE and had a meeting with CE who decided that taking time out of other projects for what is actually a continuity scene wasn't worthwhile so they parted company. I like half full glasses
conmarcas3
09-11-2013
Originally Posted by James_Vick:
“When Eccleston turned them down why didn't they call Paul McGann instead of John Hurt?

Up until recentaly we believed McGann's Doctor fought in and ended the Time War. Why Moffat though it was a good idea too create another Doctor when Eccleston turned it down is beyond me. They should have just called up Paul McGann, he still looks looks close enough to what he did in 1996 that it would be believable, he does look a little older but that can be explain easily as we don't know how long the McGann body lasted for.

Please don't misquote me and think that I don't like John Hurt, I do like him he's a fantastic and it'll be interesting to see his interpenetration of the Doctor if nothing else. But the main reason this annoys me somewhat is that McGann is the most unappreciated Doctor of all due to all having one on-screen adventure, he really deserves more screen time and he what's appear in the show again so I really don't get why Moffat's did what he did but then again why that man does anything is beyond me.”


Am I the only one to bring up the elephant in the room here? Is this in regards to his regeneration? Is it an activity only done in the Tardis library? Another use for the sonic screwdriver, or just a Freudian slip?
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map