DS Forums

 
 

Blu Ray Audio - yay or nay?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2013, 18:28
Buffalo Man
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 262

Have you heard about this new format? It's basically a high fidelity audio format that launched here last month, and I was wondering what people thought about it. Several albums have been released on Blu-Ray, such as Bob Marley and The Rolling Stones' respective greatest hits collections.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-24441979

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/6...ivery-age.html

The audio quality's supposed to be really, really good, but will it succeed, I wonder?
Buffalo Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 04-11-2013, 23:38
JamesBsheppard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Abertillery South Wales
Posts: 338
I've ordered Supertramp Breakfast in America on blue ray audio,waiting for it to arrive. I don't think the format will do well,other hi quality formats didnt.DVD-A failed & SACD is only just hanging on,even though you can play most SACD discs on any CD player (at standard CD quality) giving the user freedom to have 1 disc that can be used in the car or portable players & not limited to the 1 player under the TV.
JamesBsheppard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 23:39
rfonzo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 8,641
It will be interesting to hear what the audio sounds like on such an advanced technology.
rfonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 23:49
cnbcwatcher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,221
I wouldn't be able to play it on my Macs, so it's no good to me. It'll be interesting to see if it takes off though.
cnbcwatcher is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 16:01
JamesBsheppard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Abertillery South Wales
Posts: 338
The disc arrived today(see earlier post), sound quality is excellent (I rate it = to SACD) lots of dynamic range, which really benefits the lower frequency's.I compared it to the original CD release not the remastered version (which has lots compression on it) . I haven't had a time to compare it to the vinyl version yet.
JamesBsheppard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 16:33
performingmonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 18,069
If it wasn't for the ease of mp3s, high def disc formats would have taken off years ago. Unfortunately, not enough of the music-buying public care about the sound quality of what they're buying.
performingmonk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 17:13
JamesBsheppard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Abertillery South Wales
Posts: 338
If it wasn't for the ease of mp3s, high def disc formats would have taken off years ago. Unfortunately, not enough of the music-buying public care about the sound quality of what they're buying.
I agree,plus to get the full benefits of hi def you have to buy relatively expensive equipment,which most people aren't interested in doing.
JamesBsheppard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 19:59
Buffalo Man
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 262
If it wasn't for the ease of mp3s, high def disc formats would have taken off years ago. Unfortunately, not enough of the music-buying public care about the sound quality of what they're buying.
I agree with you entirely. I myself am not keen on MP3s, as I don't think the quality is that good; plus I don't see the point in paying for what is, essentially, air. I like to have the physical artefact: something that I can hold in my hands, something tangible.

I agree,plus to get the full benefits of hi def you have to buy relatively expensive equipment,which most people aren't interested in doing.
Yes, I can understand that. It's a shame, really, as the sound quality is quite important where music's concerned, IMO.
Buffalo Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 22:22
CeeO
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 747
With the disgusting brickwall compression and absence of sound quality at the mastering stage of modern music releases, the blu-ray format will add nothing of value.

Re-releases of early CD's which were mastered in the 'golden' era of digital music (mid 80s thru early 90s) may benefit but only on high end audiophile equipment.

Ultimately, most people these days are happy if the music's loud with oodles of boom and tizz.
CeeO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2013, 22:35
TheTruth1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Crapville
Posts: 13,162
Who the hell can afford high end equipment these days?
TheTruth1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 07:24
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,036
bluray audio has been around longer. i'm not sure how long i've had the stones disc for, but i'm sure i got it long before october, and that was bough instore in the uk

i don't know how long it will last as a format as dvda and sacd didn't do well, but if it's supported on all standard bluray players as opposed to needing a universal player like sacd and dvda then more people will have the facilities to play it, whereas few people would be like myself and spend a lot more on a bluray player to get both sacd and dvda playback, and the same again in the previous generation where my dvd player cost a lot more to play both formats

it doesn't need to cost a lot of money to play it, you can get an hdmi amp for £150 onwards from the likes of richer sounds to upgrade your old amp. plug your bluray player into it and it will play the HD audio formats

although i agree that the idea of hi fidelity sound seems to be lost on a lot of people these days who are happy with mp3s played in car stereos and crappy earbuds. my earbuds alone are worth more than many peoples smartphones
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 08:52
Glawster2002
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,410
Who the hell can afford high end equipment these days?
I've got a high end system.

Although to be fair it has taken 30 years to get to the stage it is at now and I don't have a mortgage or kids!

In saying that, though, somewhere like Richer Sounds is a good place to go for a more moderately prices system that will be a vast improvement on what most people have. However it seems to me most people are happy to accept mediocre as "good" these days.
Glawster2002 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 09:11
Glawster2002
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,410
Originally Posted by Buffalo Man;69625280[B
]I agree with you entirely. I myself am not keen on MP3s, as I don't think the quality is that good; plus I don't see the point in paying for what is, essentially, air. I like to have the physical artefact: something that I can hold in my hands, something tangible. [/b]



Yes, I can understand that. It's a shame, really, as the sound quality is quite important where music's concerned, IMO.
I have no problem with MP3, as for traveling an MP3 player is a wonderful device, however it would never be my source of choice at home. As for paying for them, I just rip my CDs, so I can rip them at the quality I want.
Glawster2002 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 09:40
mrkite77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: arizona
Posts: 5,220
I've got a high end system.
Even in today's economy, a decent surround sound system can be had for less than $200. (Although to be fair, I spent more than that on my center speaker alone).

That's the real benefit of bluray music. 5.1 PCM without the lossy DTS you get on DVDs.
mrkite77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 12:16
TheTruth1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Crapville
Posts: 13,162
People must really have not enjoyed music before high quality audio and HDMI
TheTruth1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 12:39
AcerBen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
I won't be surprised if this fails, but eventually 24 bit music will be the norm. They need to work on a format which compresses it down from 1GB a song and/or wait for internet speeds to get ridiculously fast. It might take 20 years but we'll probably be able to stream studio quality sound off the Net easily eventually. We won't need to stick to 320kbps MP3s forever.
AcerBen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 12:42
AcerBen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
I won't be surprised if this fails, but eventually 24 bit music will be the norm. They need to work on a format which compresses it down from 1GB a song and/or wait for internet speeds to get ridiculously fast. It might take 20 years but we'll probably be able to stream studio quality sound off the Net easily eventually. We won't need to stick to 320kbps MP3s forever.
Actually there's got to be some sort of 24bit compressed lossless file already available hasn't there? Neil Young has been developing a music player for super high quality files dunno what happened to it.
AcerBen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 12:47
AcerBen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
Here we go, it's launching next year.
http://evolver.fm/2013/08/13/neil-yo...sound-quality/
AcerBen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 12:58
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,597
wait for internet speeds to get ridiculously fast
Surely if internet speeds are already well fast enough to cope with streaming HD video then high quality audio by comparison is a breeze? Discs of any format are a medium whose days are passing.
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 13:17
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,036
I won't be surprised if this fails, but eventually 24 bit music will be the norm. They need to work on a format which compresses it down from 1GB a song and/or wait for internet speeds to get ridiculously fast. It might take 20 years but we'll probably be able to stream studio quality sound off the Net easily eventually. We won't need to stick to 320kbps MP3s forever.
a 24bit flac album is less than 1gb in size. where do you get 1gb for a song from?
even an 5.1 HD audio is much less than that per song
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 15:27
Glawster2002
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,410
People must really have not enjoyed music before high quality audio and HDMI
Historically there has always been a demand for improvement, FM over AM radio, vinyl, CD, etc. Where this falls down is with MP3, where quality, in terms of bit rate, is seen as less desirable over quantity.
Glawster2002 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 15:32
Glawster2002
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,410
Surely if internet speeds are already well fast enough to cope with streaming HD video then high quality audio by comparison is a breeze? Discs of any format are a medium whose days are passing.
There will always be a demand for discs, both CD and vinyl, because there will always be collectors and music lovers who will keep it alive, but for mainstream commercial pop music it is becoming less important.
Glawster2002 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 15:44
Dirtyhippy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: S Wales
Posts: 1,281
I'd love to try it but I bet there will be very little released on it, just the highly successful baby boomer artists and groups if your lucky, and classical/jazz.
Dirtyhippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 16:02
Buffalo Man
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 262
I have no problem with MP3, as for traveling an MP3 player is a wonderful device, however it would never be my source of choice at home. As for paying for them, I just rip my CDs, so I can rip them at the quality I want.
To be fair, you do have a point - MP3 players/iPods are brilliant devices when it comes to travelling, but no, MP3s wouldn't be my source of choice at home either; and I rip my CDs too.
Buffalo Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2013, 16:33
TheTruth1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Crapville
Posts: 13,162
Wouldn't it be great to have space for CDs or vinyl?
Or to be able to afford to buy top range equipment for so called 'superior' formats?

But I don't and I can't so I have to 'make do' with 320k MP3 which, lets's be honest, most people cannot discern the differences between it and FLAC.

I hate format snobbery and the misguided, idiotic notion that people who listen to MP3s are not true music fans. You know what? Live will ALWAYS beat recorded no matter what format it is on.
TheTruth1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:50.