Originally Posted by jabbamk1:
“You're missing the point.
What you're saying is like this.
That 50% of the American population have smartphones
And that 80% of the UK population have smartphones.
So in the USA that's around ~150m people, and in the UK that's ~50m people. Depsite the UK having a lower number, the percentage is higher which shows that in the UK, a higher percentage are more likely to buy a smartphone.
So in this case, more people on EE, Voda and Three are more likely to get a smartphone than those on O2. It's nothing to do with how many customers a network have.”
No, YOU'RE missing the point, and your logic is flawed.
The point is how many smartphone customers each network is acquiring over a given time. Each network started with zero eight years ago as phones before that time aren't counted in today's smartphone figures.
What I'm saying is since 2006 11m customers buying new smartphones chose to go with O2, and less than 7m chose to go with 3.
It has
nothing to do with how many customers each network had to begin with since none of them were smartphone customers.
Quote:
“And why are you painting me with the same paintbrush as "others".”
You're one to speak, being the one that deliberately does it to me all the time.
Perhaps you forget this forum isn't all about you. When I post I am addressing everybody.